1960 Saratoga for a change

Status
Not open for further replies.

tbm3fan

Old Man with a Hat
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
5,339
Reaction score
2,922
Location
Pleasant Hill, CA
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Contact seller
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/cto/3451053714.html

Good running daily driver. Has the 383 V8 with a 4 barrel carburetor. Recently painted to match original colors. Interior is in fair condition. The front seat needs attention but back seat, door panels and headliner are in good condition. Current registration and clean title in my name. Car always in San Francisco. Sold new at Earl C. Anthony on Van Ness Avenue in SF. $5000 cash only, no trades. LOCAL

fbd48.jpg
 
Very nice! Appears to be rust free. And it's resonably priced.
 
It has a recent repaint, the trims shows its age and use and was not removed for the repaint. My daily driver looks better conditionwise and has mostly first paint.
 
Nice daily driver....love it!

Wait a minute...

icon1.png
UGH, sorry, I know there are those who think otherwise, but IMHO that is the ugliest face/front end ever put on a mopar. The rear is ok, but jeezus.....the front is a disaster. It LOOKS like an angry face, what with those "eye brows"......EXNR, my man you screwed that one up.

 
Looks best with the 300 letter car for sure, about one of the best fins though. Cleanest overall looks in this design cycle will always be the 57 model year though for all Mopars. The 57 GM models looked like a Model T next to these.
 
He'll have to report to a parole officer by the end of the day.:)
 
Daily Driver? Thats not a daily driver......

What do you mean. Everybody who sells a car on Craigslist says it is a daily driver so they can't all be wrong. Now if it was a F600 Cab over then maybe not a daily driver...
 
Exner design

icon1.png
UGH, sorry, I know there are those who think otherwise, but IMHO that is the ugliest face/front end ever put on a mopar. the front is a disaster. It LOOKS like an angry face, what with those "eye brows"......EXNR, my man you screwed that one up.

OK... whats it gonna be....? You said the same thing about the 61 Plymouth front end.... There can't be two ugliest ever cars....:poke:


You may have good taste in hamburgers but you missed the boat on the beauty of design of these cars....




[/QUOTE]
 
icon1.png
UGH, sorry, I know there are those who think otherwise, but IMHO that is the ugliest face/front end ever put on a mopar. the front is a disaster. It LOOKS like an angry face, what with those "eye brows"......EXNR, my man you screwed that one up.

OK... whats it gonna be....? You said the same thing about the 61 Plymouth front end.... There can't be two ugliest ever cars....:poke:


You may have good taste in hamburgers but you missed the boat on the beauty of design of these cars....




[/QUOTE]

Well said Will!

I don't know of one Exner design dud....that's just my .02
 
360px-Wienermobile-NAIAS-2005.jpgThe Wienermobile looks better. And no cheap dirty jokes in this tread.:)

360px-Wienermobile-NAIAS-2005.jpg
 
Last edited:
Wait a minute...

icon1.png
UGH, sorry, I know there are those who think otherwise, but IMHO that is the ugliest face/front end ever put on a mopar. The rear is ok, but jeezus.....the front is a disaster. It LOOKS like an angry face, what with those "eye brows"......EXNR, my man you screwed that one up.


I liked all the finned Exner cars and all the '60 Mopar makes front and rear, but didn't really like the '59 Chrysler, Desoto and Imperial front ends. The '59 Dodge front however I really like, and I am definitely a fan of the evil eyebrows.

59 Dodge Coronet (1).jpg

59 Dodge Coronet (1).jpg
 
The ugliest car from the fifties or sixties is better looking than the best looking car built today.

(Sent using Forum Runner)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top