For Sale 1979 Chrysler 300 Low Miles - $5995 (Oneida)

Status
Not open for further replies.

1970cat

Senior Member
FCBO Gold Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
3,411
Reaction score
3,011
Location
central ny
Feedback: 2 / 0 / 0
Contact seller
not mine
1979 Chrysler 300 Low Miles
01010_4FyE9g0I7Td_600x450.jpg

00s0s_bxz9jCk5l5M_600x450.jpg

01313_eXgaRL5tHc7_600x450.jpg

00101_j0vkppPrkbw_600x450.jpg

00h0h_ct9rvFm51d8_600x450.jpg

00Z0Z_5cmbMTvQOJN_600x450.jpg

00k0k_3JWDnBVVNgf_600x450.jpg

01414_k4sDFhvVcbQ_600x450.jpg

00I0I_69opsgzvicE_600x450.jpg

00g0g_8QUE8StYU15_600x450.jpg

00v0v_h4juph1HKA7_600x450.jpg

1979 Chrysler 300 with low miles. 49,500 original miles, Florida car. All matching numbers, comes with 360 V8 and 4 barrel carburetor. Factory air conditioning (still works) and fine Corinthian Leather seats. Cruise control, factory 8 track radio, great tires, and etc. This is a must see car for the money. Please do not get this car mixed up with Corodba, the only thing the two cars have in common is the body. Chrysler made 4292 of these cars in 1979 including 477 red ones for the Canadian market. Remember the 300 was a special edition car made in limited quantities. $5,995.00 OBO. Please feel free to ask questions via: text, email, or call me. I do not need help selling the car so please do not ask me. May consider partial trade.
 
For a low mile Florida car it sure has enough rust under the hood and did not maintain the leather drivers seat....what else didn't they do???
 
I have owned one in the mid to late '80's and I almost purchased one new in 1979. I have also owned a '79 Magnum GT, t-top E-58 (Police pkg.) car in the early '80s. My opinion and the ladies back then that the Magnum was the better car of the two. You could choose from several colors on the Magnum and it looked much sportier of a car. That is why this year I found a Magnum GT, t-top, E-58 car. Time to own a Dodge again for me.

100_0386.JPG
 
I remember the dealership, where I bought my A12 Road Runner, had three of these 300's left at the end of the 79 model year and wanted to broom them out. Great deal. I looked and walked away because of the poor quality and fit & finish of all three cars. I'm amazed any survived.
 
I remember the dealership, where I bought my A12 Road Runner, had three of these 300's left at the end of the 79 model year and wanted to broom them out. Great deal. I looked and walked away because of the poor quality and fit & finish of all three cars. I'm amazed any survived.

I'm a bit surprised... Those were all built in Canada, which was always a better-quality plant vs. the Detroit plants like Lynch or Hamtramck (I'll let others do the math here). Jefferson was better than the latter two, having largely an older, 1st Gen immigrant workforce.
 
I remember the dealership, where I bought my A12 Road Runner, had three of these 300's left at the end of the 79 model year and wanted to broom them out. Great deal. I looked and walked away because of the poor quality and fit & finish of all three cars. I'm amazed any survived.

The one I almost bought was a left over and I agree poor build quality. I remember most of the cars chrome was going to be replaced as it was pitting. I signed the papers but backed out after thinking about it.
 
QC must have gone down the toilet overnight. My '76 build quality was fine (by contemporary stds, anyway).
 
QC must have gone down the toilet overnight. My '76 build quality was fine (by contemporary stds, anyway).

I think many issues (at least for Canadian-built cars) were more related to material quality because of an emphasis on weight savings. Remember both the B and C bodies went on a diet in '78 and a lot of stainless trim became aluminum, aluminum trim became plastic, carpets got thinner, etc. This probably translated itself to both perception (touch/feel) and actual fit, because the new materials didn't play well with steel bodies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top