For Sale 71 Imp, 69 Imp

[commando1]

I checked but and couldn't find it posted previously, so...


1971 chrysler imperial 440 cubic engine
1971 chrysler imperial 440 cubic engine
CAR IS RUN AND DRIVE

• text
  ☎ (443) 600-7916
  
  
• reply by email:
  hjmgr-6397124379@sale.craigslist.org
  
  
  
  
• 

 

[traintech55]

Stan, you are slipping. It's a 1972.

 

[commando1]

Chrysler Imperial/ Barn find
1969 Imperial Brougham 2 door hard top California Car .
Color is blue interior is blue combo of cloth and leather.
Has a 440 engine with 60,000 original miles. RUST FREE
Call for more information. 603-522-6695

 

[commando1]

Stan, you are slipping. It's a 1972.

I only cut n past. I don't edit.

 

[traintech55]

I only cut n past. I don't edit.

OK then.

 

[MOVE N UP]

Stan, you are slipping. It's a 1972.

73 grille...

 

[commando1]

It's a Fuselage Imperial Coupe. Howzzat?

 

[oliver]

Stan, you are slipping. It's a 1972.

'73 due to the bumper guards

 

[330dTA]

I think it was agreed, that this ’69 Imperial 2d HT was a California car some 15 years ago. I wonder what the Maine weather has done to the sheetmetal meanwhile.

IF it is rust free, it’s a nice find indeed.

BTW there seems to be more frost in Maine, than back here. Here it’s all wet, like most winters nowadays.

 

[traintech55]

73 grille...

'73 due to the bumper guards

I stand corrected.

 

[crv]

Repeat, both of them.

 

[saforwardlook]

Repeat, both of them.

Its not Stan's fault that the search engine on this site is its worst attribute, IMO (otherwise, it seems to be quite good in most other areas). It is frustrating to find many former posts in my experience.

 

[crv]

Its not Stan's fault that the search engine on this site is its worst attribute, IMO (otherwise, it seems to be quite good in most other areas). It is frustrating to find many former posts in my experience.

It doesn't bother me.
Just taking a poke at Stan, he reminds everyone about this sort of thing regularly.
All in good fun

 

[saforwardlook]

It doesn't bother me.
Just taking a poke at Stan, he reminds everyone about this sort of thing regularly.
All in good fun

Just to be clear, I meant it is frustrating to try to find former posts using this site's search engine. I don't mind seeing repeats.

 

[crv]

Just to be clear, I meant it is frustrating to try to find former posts using this site's search engine. I don't mind seeing repeats.

I agree, navigating the site can be frustrating.

 

[commando1]

I dislike repeats as much as anyone. When I do it, I get really annoyed because Dave @polara71 gets to write it down in his log.
I actually do use the Search function first and I have to tell you it is downright effing gawd awful. It doesn't use Google style parameters. Been bitching to Joey since day 1 and if we click on enough ads, maybe we can get him the money to upgrade.



If there is an upgrade.

 

[1978 NYB]

That 69 would be a nice daily driver.

 

[polara71]

I dislike repeats as much as anyone. When I do it, I get really annoyed because Dave @polara71 gets to write it down in his log.
I actually do use the Search function first and I have to tell you it is downright effing gawd awful. It doesn't use Google style parameters. Been bitching to Joey since day 1 and if we click on enough ads, maybe we can get him the money to upgrade.



If there is an upgrade.

Yet we get notified when you're mentioned in a thread by another member . Weird .....