Ram Fury
Member
Lads --
I have always maintained the horsepower figures on the ram-inducted '60-'61 Plymouths and Darts were just a bit on the conservative side. I base this on the HP listings of the earlier Dodges and DeSotos as the '58 Dodge Super D-500 was the 361 CID B-series engine and was rated at 320 HP (2X4V carbs). In 1959, the 383 came out and with 2X4V carbs and had 345 for Dodge and 350 for DeSoto, but they came out of the same plant. In the 1960 model year, the big engine for Plymouth was initially to be the 361 SonoRamic Commando (2X4V=310 HP), but Dodge was dropping 383s in the Dart which made the Plymouth dealers (not the division brass) upset, so Plymouth also got the ram 383 with 330 horses (not 345/350). In the meanwhile, Dodge was saying their ram 361 had 320 ponies and Plymouth was advertising theirs at 310. Same components, same plant, yet with different numbers. Now I think the real kicker is the '60 ram 413, as in the 300F with 375 ponies, so perhaps the smaller 361 and 383 ram engines, basically the same internally as the ram 413, might not generate proportionate horsepower. Thus, if the 361 is 87% the size of the 413, it follows to me that it should be getting 325-330 horses and if the 383 is 93% of the bigger engine, it should get more like 350-360. I have discussed this with some interesting people such as former Chrysler executives, engineers, historical society people, and even ex-Ramchargers and they tend to agree. I was able to test my theory this past May at a car show that allowed for 1/8 mile fun drags, so I was lucky to pit my current Big-Tailed Beast ('60 Fury 383 SonoRamic Commando/2.93 rear end) against a 69 Road Runner (335 HP/4-speed, 3.23s). This was my first time on a strip since 1961 and my first with the "christmas tree" lights, not a flagman, so he caught me a bit off the line, but I'll be darned if I didn't see his front bumper behind by the time we backed off. Interesting.
Joe Godec
I have always maintained the horsepower figures on the ram-inducted '60-'61 Plymouths and Darts were just a bit on the conservative side. I base this on the HP listings of the earlier Dodges and DeSotos as the '58 Dodge Super D-500 was the 361 CID B-series engine and was rated at 320 HP (2X4V carbs). In 1959, the 383 came out and with 2X4V carbs and had 345 for Dodge and 350 for DeSoto, but they came out of the same plant. In the 1960 model year, the big engine for Plymouth was initially to be the 361 SonoRamic Commando (2X4V=310 HP), but Dodge was dropping 383s in the Dart which made the Plymouth dealers (not the division brass) upset, so Plymouth also got the ram 383 with 330 horses (not 345/350). In the meanwhile, Dodge was saying their ram 361 had 320 ponies and Plymouth was advertising theirs at 310. Same components, same plant, yet with different numbers. Now I think the real kicker is the '60 ram 413, as in the 300F with 375 ponies, so perhaps the smaller 361 and 383 ram engines, basically the same internally as the ram 413, might not generate proportionate horsepower. Thus, if the 361 is 87% the size of the 413, it follows to me that it should be getting 325-330 horses and if the 383 is 93% of the bigger engine, it should get more like 350-360. I have discussed this with some interesting people such as former Chrysler executives, engineers, historical society people, and even ex-Ramchargers and they tend to agree. I was able to test my theory this past May at a car show that allowed for 1/8 mile fun drags, so I was lucky to pit my current Big-Tailed Beast ('60 Fury 383 SonoRamic Commando/2.93 rear end) against a 69 Road Runner (335 HP/4-speed, 3.23s). This was my first time on a strip since 1961 and my first with the "christmas tree" lights, not a flagman, so he caught me a bit off the line, but I'll be darned if I didn't see his front bumper behind by the time we backed off. Interesting.
Joe Godec