What is this?

[Ironram]

As far as I can tell its a 67 or 68 ???????? I want one!! TIA

 

[patrick66]

1967 300. Yeah, 300. No side marker lamps in '67, with for '68.

---

(correction vs. Newport!)

 

[Ironram]

I love the *** on that thing lol

 

[commando1]

Google is your friend...

Not a Newport, It's a 300.
Shame on you Patrick. You of all people...

 

[patrick66]

I knew that. A 300. Just seeing if you guys were paying attention!

 

[Big_John]

Yep, 67 300. I like the 67 rear better then the 68 and the 68 nose better than the 67.

 

[patrick66]

Same with me.

If someone were to offer me a choice between a '67 Coronet R/T 440 car and a '67 300, I'd be all over the 300. Preferably in Turbine Bronze Metallic with a black interior. Yum!

 

[Ironram]

1967 Newport Custom. No side marker lamps in '67, with for '68.

So that would be why the 67 polara I have now does not, but the 68 I had in high school did. Learned something new thanks.

 

[Pete Kaczmarski]

Yep, 67 300. I like the 67 rear better then the 68 and the 68 nose better than the 67.

I agree 100%

 

[patrick66]

So that would be why the 67 Polara I have now does not, but the 68 I had in high school did. Learned something new thanks.

The sidemarkers were a US government requirement as part of the FMVSS rules, beginning in the 1968 model year for all new cars and trucks sold in the US.

 

[detmatt]

Also that vent behind the rear window was '67 only.

 

[Stormer]

The sidemarkers were a US government requirement as part of the FMVSS rules, beginning in the 1968 model year for all new cars and trucks sold in the US.

Yea, except that Ma Mopar seemed to buy up a surplus of leftover bass boat lights.