NOT MINE 300 Hurst.

[crv]

1970 Chrysler 300hurst

1970 Chrysler 300hurst mopar​

$49,500
Listed a day ago
a day ago
in Marilla, NY

About this vehicle​

Driven 29,000 miles

Automatic transmission

Exterior colour: White · Interior colour: Tan

Clear history
This vehicle has no significant damage or problems.

Seller's description​

1970 Chrysler 300Hurst Survivor with 29,000 miles, 440 automatic, 2nd owner. Well optioned, and very original. Window sticker shows all the options. Very rare mopar only 500 made. $49,500 Don't ask if it is still for sale, I will not respond. No tire kickers. I have listed this for my husband Gary

Seller information​

Seller details

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/100000654999538/?product_id=485828850729263&__tn__=<
Sharon Foersch

 

[azblackhemi]

Plant Security Stereo Tape? Huh?

 

[polara71]

Is this a known car? What I mean by that is, is it in all the registries ?

I don't want anything this nice but I can't stop looking .

Do these bring 49 ?

 

[crv]

Is this a known car? What I mean by that is, is it in all the registries ?

I don't want anything this nice but I can't stop looking .

Do these bring 49 ?

They have sold for more than that, I know, Mecum prices can be a bit misleading, but people are prepared to pay big $ for them.
1970 Chrysler 300 Hurst Edition for Sale at Auction - Mecum Auctions

 

[ayilar]

CM27U0C228771

 

[SportFury70]

Plant Security Stereo Tape? Huh?

I was wondering that too

 

[SportFury70]

1970 Chrysler 300hurst

1970 Chrysler 300hurst mopar​

$49,500
Listed a day ago
a day ago
in Marilla, NY

About this vehicle​

Driven 29,000 miles

Automatic transmission

Exterior colour: White · Interior colour: Tan

Clear history
This vehicle has no significant damage or problems.

Seller's description​

1970 Chrysler 300Hurst Survivor with 29,000 miles, 440 automatic, 2nd owner. Well optioned, and very original. Window sticker shows all the options. Very rare mopar only 500 made. $49,500 Don't ask if it is still for sale, I will not respond. No tire kickers. I have listed this for my husband Gary

Seller information​

Seller details
https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/profile/100000654999538/?product_id=485828850729263&__tn__=<
Sharon Foersch
View attachment 674889
View attachment 674890
View attachment 674891
View attachment 674892
View attachment 674894

View attachment 674893
View attachment 674895
View attachment 674896

Is this a known car? What I mean by that is, is it in all the registries ?

I put it on the hurst registry page last night

 

[Big_John]

The owner has just posted: For Sale - 1970 Chrysler 300Hurst

 

[polara71]

Nobody wants it more than I do.

 

[SportFury70]

Nobody wants it more than I do.

Chryslers are startin to grow on ya now huh Dave, first it was the Polara then it was the Fury. Now its this. It must be because you parked next to David’s car at Carlisle. I get it, I would love one too. This ones probably the most optioned one out there.

 

[polara71]

Chryslers are startin to grow on ya now huh Dave, first it was the Polara then it was the Fury. Now its this. It must be because you parked next to David’s car at Carlisle. I get it, I would love one too. This ones probably the most optioned one out there.

As noted several times I always wanted one. That kinda went away after the Auburn car in 98. Parking next to David’s car for four days fueled an old flame.

 

[Samplingman]

As noted several times I always wanted one. That kinda went away after the Auburn car in 98. Parking next to David’s car for four days fueled an old flame.

I would buy it just for this:

 

[crv]

Would've been better if the centre console had been standard in all of them, just my opinion.

 

[ayilar]

Would've been better if the centre console had been standard in all of them, just my opinion.

For looks, maybe. For comfort and practicality, no way. I’ll take the buddy seat any day.

 

[crv]

For looks, maybe. For comfort and practicality, no way. I’ll take the buddy seat any day.

For looks, definitely. The car is all about styling.

 

[ayilar]

For looks, definitely. The car is all about styling.

I beg to disagree. Looks matter but I drive my cars long-distance, and prefer something comfortable even when they are powerful (otherwise, why get a C-body?).

FWIW, I drove 1,000 miles with @Ripinator over two days in 2022 with my 1970 300 TNT convertible (now his) that I had bought in 2021, and the lack of center armrest was a noticeable hindrance on driving comfort. Compared to doing the same drives from Northern IL to Central PA in Medina (my 1971 Monaco, 2021) and Buttercup (my 1972 NYB, this year), the difference was striking. (Note: as I have previously noted, the 1972-1973 NYB armrests (Brougham only) are a massive improvement on the 1969-1971 P-D-C door armrests, but the buddy seat and armrest is the same on all fuselage P-D-C and it makes a big difference between console vs. non-console bucket-seats cars.)

@david hill may want to chime in, as he drove both his 1969 300 TNT 'vert and his 300 Hurst (Edit: both of David's cars have a console) over the same route.

 

[ayilar]

Nobody wants it more than I do.

Including the H53 AutoTemp?

 

[polara71]

Including the H53 AutoTemp?

Who cares , I would never use the air anyway, I wouldn't know if it worked or not.

 

[ayilar]

Who cares , I would never use the air anyway, I wouldn't know if it worked or not.

Do you ever use the heater?

 

[Samplingman]

Nobody wants it more than I do.

It still wouldn’t scratch that convertible itch.