Looking at the gas and brake pedals I see a fair amount of dirt embedded in them. At 50 miles that much when the carpet is pristine. I have my doubts also.
meh I'm not to worried about the brake pedal, it does have some mung on it but the lower right corner rubber looks unworn, gas pedal is out of focus so can't tell anything there. For the age and amount of time this car has been recently moved around the mung on the brake pedal is understandable but why oh why if this is the pro BaT photographer that they don't take a rag and wipe the rubber off to highlight such a low mileage car. (seen this in many other pictures).
I not implying that this is a rolled over 100k+ mileage car but one would need to look for date codes on the tires and wear as my eyeballing the pictures it looks to me the rolling tires vs. the spare tire may have 100's if not a few 1,000 miles on them.
It appears that this car was at some shows in 2014 & 2025 but it must of been trailered to keep the odometer at 50 mile mark.
Back in the 70's it was not uncommon for owners to disconnect the speedometer cable to keep the car in warranty range. The mid 70's was rife with quality control issues and warranty claims and with a 12 month 12,000 mile standard warranty a lot of people were jigging things around.
I know I was asked a few times to disconnect a speedometer cable on a new car someone had bought back then and also knew the speedometer cable head had a plastic connector tab that would break when you pressed the tab to remove to prevent odometer fraud, so that way was out of the question. Transmission cable nut should have warranty paint on it but many new cars (Ford) I saw in the late 70's & early 80's didn't have that and when I was approached on this subject I'd just respond "Yeah if you want to pay me 50 bucks to crawl under your car I'll do it" and 50 bucks in the 70's was a bit of coin and would shut them up quick. lol
This is a nice car but if it really does have 50 miles on it I'd bore scope it to check the crosshatch and for any rusting in the cylinders as we all know at 50 miles the car hasn't been broken in and fresh un-glazed cylinder walls are ripe to rust so that would be a concern if you would actually use the car. Plus also the usual rubber/plastic parts that may have deteriorated with age, fluids etc. But as far as if the car has 50, 500, or 5,000 miles on it would have to have a good experienced person eyeballing it in person. The black undercoating is a little questionable too as this maybe a fresh coverup trick, easy check is to scrape back a edge in a rusted area to edge of undercoat and if it's rusted under the undercoat it would be fresh coverup. Why?
Oh yeah... to make it POP! Also appears to be two forms of undercoating as we see the brown cosmoline type in the trunk vs. black under car. I never saw this brown cosmoline on the inner trunk quarter panels on my 1976/77 (3) Gran Fury's but this car did have dealer installed undercoating.
Remember we have just seen that 2k+ mile Road Runner that was on BaT (went for $42k+) that was pretty much showroom mint to compare to this car images.
It's also funny that they show the Quaker State Oil letter as back in the late 70's maybe early 80's there was a bad batch of Quaker State multi-viscosity oil that had a recall consumer lawsuit where in very cold sub-zero temperatures the oil turned into Jell-O and engines would seize up on cold weather startup's. That happened to the 1976 Plymouth Gran Fury Brougham that I got for free from the cab company I serviced the cars for in the 80's. I don't know the whole story other than Quaker State put a new engine in it via the claim, but best I could tell is that it got a wreaking yard motor. Didn't bother checking numbers... it was free after all and ran pretty good.
.