Ram Fury
Member
Lads --
I understand that the reason for the increased cost of the 426S with 4-speed trans ($515) versus the TorqueFlite ($483) on the '65 Sport Fury (and possibly on all other Furys as well) is because the cars were "originally assembled with automatics" and had to be "retrofitted" to accommodate the manual. I believe this retrofit was to slice an opening in the floor panel for the shift linkage (a Hurst in the case of the '65s). When the trans was out of my '65, I got under and took the pic below of the opening in the floor. To me, it looks like it was done manually right on the line by some guy grabbing a handy metal power saw and simply ripping the necessary hole. Has anyone else had the occasion to see their car was retrofitted?
Joe Godec
I understand that the reason for the increased cost of the 426S with 4-speed trans ($515) versus the TorqueFlite ($483) on the '65 Sport Fury (and possibly on all other Furys as well) is because the cars were "originally assembled with automatics" and had to be "retrofitted" to accommodate the manual. I believe this retrofit was to slice an opening in the floor panel for the shift linkage (a Hurst in the case of the '65s). When the trans was out of my '65, I got under and took the pic below of the opening in the floor. To me, it looks like it was done manually right on the line by some guy grabbing a handy metal power saw and simply ripping the necessary hole. Has anyone else had the occasion to see their car was retrofitted?
Joe Godec