CitronPresse
Member
I got it!
Don't see any damage anywhere
I know it's normal but is there a way to check the pump (without specific tool to test the pressure)?
Don't worry about the traces on the rod it's my finger mark
The mechanism seems to work very well, but the internal diaphragm is probably shot I suppose
Considering the price I intend to change it anyway, but for the rod I don't know how to make sure that it's good
And for the pump, in appearance mine looks more like that for L engine with the 1/2 nut connection, but fitted with a rubber hose connector
1969 CHRYSLER 300 7.2L 440cid V8 Fuel Pump | RockAuto
I better take the one for K engine anyway?
Is the connector the only difference between the two or do you think there are internal differences?
Thanks!
Don't see any damage anywhere
I know it's normal but is there a way to check the pump (without specific tool to test the pressure)?
Don't worry about the traces on the rod it's my finger mark
The mechanism seems to work very well, but the internal diaphragm is probably shot I suppose
Considering the price I intend to change it anyway, but for the rod I don't know how to make sure that it's good
And for the pump, in appearance mine looks more like that for L engine with the 1/2 nut connection, but fitted with a rubber hose connector
1969 CHRYSLER 300 7.2L 440cid V8 Fuel Pump | RockAuto
I better take the one for K engine anyway?
Is the connector the only difference between the two or do you think there are internal differences?
Thanks!