Chryslerdude
Well-Known Member
Ha ha.. no cigar !
Ha ha.. no cigar !
Ha ha, yes.. I guess driving an Imperial is already signaling that one is "financially careless", so to complete the picture, AND keep the car looking as close to the original as possible, it should also have the correct tire..Yes,they are pricey..It not how much..it is how you look..MAHVELOUS!
View attachment 71206
Any pic's inhere, of the alleged Pimperial ? :-DThere's another guy with similar tastes around here and the majority didn't hate the Pimperial as I remember. He don't give a damn about our opinion.
This is exactly where I am at now.. thanks !235x75x15 with one inch whitewalls... Don't do the extra wide..... Just don't.
I think it is disappointing that this really nice example of a 1969 Imperial 2 door ended up with you. Lowering it or putting wide whites on it is nothing less than a discrace to it. Why didn't you just get some worthless 4 door to pimp?
Any pic's inhere, of the alleged Pimperial ? :-D
The lowering is intended to restore it's original ride height, (read and check pic's post # 8), and as for the wrong tires.. I am sorry to disappoint, with my naughty "Fat WW tire thoughts", and happy to announce that I am going with he narrow stripe.
How is a 4 door worthless?
He's on the road tooting his own horn,LOL Ha hah!I am surprised that Ross hasn't commented here.
The worse the weather, the less we hear from him.He's on the road tooting his own horn,LOL Ha hah!
If you want a tad lower,then go 2357015I'm with the majority. The wide white walls are not right for your car! With the stock wheels the best would be the 2 striped tires, as original. But as Matt stated, they are crazy expensive... The best replacement would be 1" thin white walls.
But I'm with you about the ride hight. It looks like a stork and need to be lowered tastefully. Just a tab lower then the picture from the brochure. It makes the car look longer and more elegant floating down the road, imho.
I have never found 70 series in a WW.If you want a tad lower,then go 2357015
Well.. actually, comparing was exactly what I did, and as you see, mine is several inches higher.. front AND rear.
Here, what we must assume it the correct height... picture shot kneeling, in a flat angle.. Note the lower line of the fender skirt, is flush with painted portion of the rear hubcap, even with picture taken in a FLAT vertical angle.
View attachment 71194
Here, the blue wonder.. clearly considerably higher, even with the picture shot standing up, in a downwards angle, so please include the shot angle in your "height calculations".. When it arrived, the front looked even higher than it does here, on these (sellers) pic's...
View attachment 71192
:-D
Where are you? That isn't a US model... very nice looking though...While I didn't read it specifically for Mopars of the day, it was common practice to have cars loaded for press and Advertising pics to make them look more road hugging.
The drawings from the years before were even more idealizing by also changing proportions like the masters "Fitz and Van" who worked for GM till the early 70s. Get a load of that:
View attachment 71426 View attachment 71427
Where are you? That isn't a US model... very nice looking though...
Germany. Opel was the last assignment for Fitz and Van. They became too costly. AFAIK they actually travelled to These places they depicted.
The GS Commodore models were sort of a Euro sized Skylark GS roughly said.