For Sale '69 PLYMOUTH SPORT FURY

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally avocado metallic?
 
What's the problem with the C pillar?
 
Yah some of these guys are picky about thier C-pillars, personally I find nothing wrong with this one or the alternative.
 
I see ,,interesting as I never really thought about it.

What is a normal one then?
 
I see ,,interesting as I never really thought about it.

What is a normal one then?
7-jpg.95031

1969-plymouth-sport-fury-iii-red-2dr-hardtop-413-cuin-engine-10.JPG
 
Now that I have studied the two pics I prefer the white car's C pillar. Looks abit more aggressive doesn't make the trunk look as long.
 
1969-plymouth-fury-3-wallpaper-4.jpg
S5002344.jpg
32029820002_large.jpg
003.jpg
6197113713_753b977288_b.jpg
1969-plymouth-fury-iii-2-door-383-cubic-inch-engine-and-all-original-sheet-metal-5.jpg



Look again ...... different angles show different perspectives. I am not a fan of the featured cars window but I like the car..... doubtful I would own one with this glass
 
Ahh yes that is where the curved or concave rear glass styles come in.
My fury has the concave glass. My fury has the same glass and C pillar as the white fury. I can see the difference between the other pics posted . I like them both for different ways. One to me looks more aggressive and one is more conservative to my eyes. Both styles are nice to me.
 
Last edited:
From my perspective I like both for different reasons. From a side shot, as seen in Stan's examples, the roof line is almost the same but the quarter glass on the standard top is raked back more so it has a sportier look which I like better. The concave rear wind shield of the sport top is sportier so I like it better. The best alternative IMO would have been to have the concave rear wind shield of the sport top with the raked quarter window of the standard top.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top