For Sale anybody familiar with this '69 300 TNT convert. in MT?

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMG_6932.JPG
IMG_6931.JPG
IMG_6930.JPG
IMG_6925.JPG
IMG_6926.JPG
IMG_6923.JPG
IMG_6921.JPG
IMG_6919.JPG
IMG_6917.JPG
IMG_6917.JPG
If he wants 21 for his I can ask at least 30 for my 70 300
 
The car has dents all over, needs new roof and interior. Trunk drop rust and rust bubbles here and there.
 
Thanks Tobias for posting the pics of this overpriced C! Really an $8k car.
 
just curious, if any you were to guess, would you say original paint on this one? (that's what the sellers says)
i also noticed the side strip instead of the three stripe usually found on the 69's. was the side strip (pardon my terminology) an option over the stripe? thanks.
 
Has every Ragtop the seam filled on the Dutchman panel where it meets the quarter panel?
 
Has every Ragtop the seam filled on the Dutchman panel where it meets the quarter panel?
Yes, for some reason they were lead filled from the factory. I remember having the same question on my Challenger convertible. I don't know why the seam wouldn't have been a better option, perhaps it had something to do with body flex.
 
Yes, for some reason they were lead filled from the factory. I remember having the same question on my Challenger convertible. I don't know why the seam wouldn't have been a better option, perhaps it had something to do with body flex.
Thanks I was wondering on my 70 300
because is the same way.
 
FYI, just heard from the seller, and he's added a few more pics, including one engine shot. I may see what his lowest is this weekend, but as you all mentioned, it doesn't seem it was garaged "prior" to him getting the car, though I guess it's possible if it is the original paint. anyway, Tobias also commented that it was pretty rusty underneath as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top