Can shocks with springs affect ride height?

People used to install back when if there pulling a camper behind. Compensated for extra weight. I ran them on one of my 68 300's, it did raise back end up, my suspension guy adjusted up torsion bars alittle to level the car out better. I liked the it sat and rode a little stiffer but good to me. This is how it sat after adjustments.

IMG_1925.jpeg


IMG_1924.jpeg
 
I think way back 50-60 years ago they did raise the car. In the last 20 years they are not very strong springs, you can move the springs up by hand. And we are not very strong compared to the weight of a car.
 
The front is too low, which makes the rear too high. The "leverage effect".

FSM for the factory specs on front suspension ride height (NOT from measuring the fender heights).

When the front suspension is not at factory ride height, or the rear end is too high, it can affect the actual caster of the front wheels, which can affect directional stability at high speeds, a bit. It also makes the front torsion bar effective stiffness softer with less preload on the bars. Which means that the front end can bottom out on bumps/dips it should not bottom out on. Many might not care about these things, being more concerned about the cosmetics and what others in their peer group might approve of. BTAIM
 
would you have the ride height specs for front and back?

Also could it be the opposite, I.e. the back too high makes the front look lower than it is?
I am more into the slabs is yours 69 or 70. Not sure if I have the Service manuals for those years to give you the specs. If you don’t have a service manually you can usually find them on https://mymopar.com/service-manuals/. Should be in the suspension section
 
I've had good success with the spring shocks. The 4 pair I remember on big sedans raised the rear at the wheel about one inch. On the Darts and Satellites, it was about 2 inches. More if the springs were weak, less if they were not. I didn't notice any draw backs.

I put four on my long wheelbase 3/4-ton 97 Dodge conversion van last year. They raised the front at least one inch. I don't think the original front coil springs were tired or sagging, maybe an inch at the very most, if any.
They raised the rear FOUR inches. The rear leaf springs were sagging "at least" two inches. That may have been because of weight added when the conversion was done, and maybe not worn-out springs.
It's a big improvement on this van. The van doesn't rock back and forth more than one time at an aggressive stop now. As opposed to three oscillations with the other "new" Monro economy front shocks and "new" Monro rear air shocks I installed a month prior. The rear air shocks did fix the rear lift problem, but the hydraulic part was sorely lacking. Both front and back.
That rocking was annoying. Now the nose drops/dives and rises/returns one time at a hard stop. And, the 5,500-pound van rides better now than any of the other dozen vehicles I have. Go figure. But, the pillow soft 78 Grand Marquis is gone, so it don't count.

So yes, I do think they raise a vehicle. And can be useful on the right vehicle.
 
From the 70 manual.
1/8” difference between A and B. Tightening the torsion bars raises the height. Loosening the torsion bars lower it. Make sure you spray the adjustment bolts with penetrating oil and take pressure off the torsion bars by jacking up the frame before turning. Screen shots of the manual from my phone. Pointing you to the right section. (Free Download from my Mopar.).

Height spec is 1-3/8” +- 1/8” between A and B (A always the highest) an no more than 1/8” difference from side to side.

IMG_9537.png
IMG_9538.png
IMG_9539.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top