EU’s controversial car laws vs repairing older vehicles

MoPar~Man

Senior Member
FCBO Gold Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
831
Location
Ontario, Canada

The proposal, originating from the European Commission and yet to be ratified, aims to phase out older, more polluting vehicles in favour of environmentally friendly options.

This prospective regulation, awaiting approval from the European Parliament and the Council, introduces the notion of a ‘residual vehicle’.

Cars experiencing failures in major components such as engines, transmissions, brakes, or steering, and deemed old (potentially around 15 years), will fall under this category. Once labelled as residual, these vehicles would be barred from undergoing significant repairs and would likely be scrapped.
The fit for 55 initiative

The EU’s ambitious ‘Fit for 55’ program seeks to eliminate direct transport emissions by 2050, with interim goals including a 55 per cent reduction by 2030 from 1990 levels.

A significant step in this journey is the 2035 ban on new combustion engine cars, excluding vehicles operating on potential future synthetic fuels. However, the reality presents challenges, as the uptake of low or zero-emission vehicles in the EU lags behind expectations, varying significantly across member states.

Spain, for example, now has an average vehicle age exceeding 14 years, with over 47 per cent of vehicles older than 15 years.

Such trends are not confined to southern European countries or those with lower incomes; Germany’s average vehicle age hovers around 10 years, with France exceeding this mark.

This ageing fleet has prompted the European Commission to propose measures aimed at reducing car longevity.
Impact on vehicle lifecycle

The crux of the controversy lies in a draft regulation redefining waste classification and management for end-of-life vehicles, promoting a circular economy.

The European Commission’s office in Spain has clarified that the proposal does not intend to prevent necessary engine repairs or replacements in standard cars.

The regulation specifies conditions under which a vehicle is deemed technically irreparable or residual. These include extensive damage, such as being cut, welded, burnt, submerged, or exhibiting irreversible technical defects.

Controversially, a vehicle requiring major part replacements or whose repair costs exceed its market value could also be classified as residual.

This raises concerns about the potential impact on the workshop sector and the preservation of classic cars. The proposal, while not forcing owners to discard their vehicles, casts doubt on the future of vehicle repairs and sales, especially for cars potentially deemed historical.

In conclusion, the EU’s new car regulation proposal, part of its broader environmental strategy, is a multifaceted issue.

It seeks to promote a cleaner future but raises questions about its implications for vehicle owners, the automotive industry, and the preservation of automotive heritage.
 
In my mind this might be acceptable for model years much after the oil embargo of ‘72 or ‘73. So when it comes to the classic and highly collectibles with such high values, repairs could never run more than the value of the vehicle. I maintain a mindset from the ‘80s that anything mechanical can be fixed.
 
We will see in 2030, when the pen runs out of ink and concessions made because of blah, blah, blah, whatever.
Problem is cars haven't gotten any better since the 60s. Making them electric is also not better. Make a better product and people will be waiting in line for them. Look at cell phones/smart phones.
Marketing always thinks the public is stupid, easily distracted yes, but sensible decisions prevail. You can't just change the package and expect people to all switch.
 
Back
Top