I asked deepseek what is the most popular Chrysler C-body car

[MoPar~Man]

I just signed up with deepseek as a joke. Created an account from my PC, using email sign-up. I tried several .com and other email domains, it wouldn't take them, but it does take gmail.

Anyways, here's the question I asked: What is the most popular Chrysler C-body car?

Some people here are going to be thrilled with the answer:

The most popular Chrysler C-body car is arguably the 1971-1973 Chrysler Imperial. The C-body platform was used for Chrysler's full-size cars from the 1960s through the 1970s, and the Imperial was the luxury flagship model. During this era, the Imperial stood out for its distinctive styling, advanced features, and powerful engine options, making it a standout in the C-body lineup.

Other notable C-body models include the Chrysler New Yorker and Chrysler Town & Country, which were also popular during their time. However, the Imperial's combination of luxury, performance, and unique design has made it particularly memorable among enthusiasts and collectors.

 

[69CoronetRT]

I’m one of those people concerned that AI generated sentences strung together and sound like they are written by a HS sophomore will be actually believed to be credible and taken as fact.

I’m hopeful no one is either “thrilled” or dismayed as they know the underlying source is crap.

 

[Samplingman]

AI descriptions on eBay are rampant. Usually the same "fluff" with no actual information about the item. I click on by without even looking at the pics. If you are too lazy to actually type a few description lines then I don't need to give you my business. I can't even look at photos on FB now, all of it is fake.

 

[cuda hunter]

The fake photos and videos are out of control.

 

[71Polara383]

The most popular C body is somewhat easy.

To normal non mopar people - The Bluesmobile

Mopar guys - probably a toss up between SFGTs and the Hurst

 

[73Coupe]

In addition, to non-moparians, the 1965 300 'vert, "Big as a whale"

Most popular could also be interpreted as most sold. Which particular C-body sold the most units?

 

[livininharrow]

lets call it sheepdeep from now on.

 

[71Polara383]

In addition, to non-moparians, the 1965 300 'vert, "Big as a whale"

Most popular could also be interpreted as most sold. Which particular C-body sold the most units?

Plymouth Fury.

 

[Big_John]

The most popular Chrysler C-body car is arguably the 1971-1973 Chrysler Imperial.

No "Chrysler Imperial" in those years. You had Chryslers and you had Imperials, no "Chrysler Imperial" as Imperial was a separate division and not a model. Imperial became a separate division in 1955.

Typical wrong internet BS that is getting amplified via AI. I'm getting tired of it myself.

 

[commando1]

Will somebody ask it:
"What is the best motor oil".
That's a thread that could go epic.

 

[amazinblue82]

No "Chrysler Imperial" in those years. You had Chryslers and you had Imperials, no "Chrysler Imperial" as Imperial was a separate division and not a model. Imperial became a separate division in 1955.

Typical wrong internet BS that is getting amplified via AI. I'm getting tired of it myself.

IMHO, this points out the current "problem" with AI. Sorry. NERD ALERT.

---

Right now, its "smarter" than any human that ever, and ever will, live. In terms of raw ability to collect/hold data, in terms processing "speed" to puke up data/send it somewhere else.

BUT, it (AI) doesnt (i exaggerate to make a point) have the IQ of a housefly.

In this context, meaning it cant make decisions like humans can. It CANT think, asses, make judgement, understand nuance, rely on intuition, "read a room' and any one of a number of attributes humans have to help us make decisions.

"Shitdeep" didnt know an Imperial in '71-'73 AINT a C-body. Its capable of knowing, but obviously doesnt. Inconsequential IN this context ... cuz the stakes are NOT "life and death" hanging in the balance of getting the 'right" answer to the query.

But, what if the hypothetical query informed the self-driven car's decision whether to kill its occupants or hit the toddler that ran in front of the car? Ready to call BS on the premise? Cool. im not.

It (AI) WILL get " smart' and "society" will be better off .. but when? in next decade or in the next century? How many "bad", AI-fueled decisions do we (society) have to endure till it learns to make decisions. Yeah, rhetorical, but I AINT BETTIN' MY LIFE ON IT TODAY.

---

Meantime my kids/grand kids' irrevocable trusts still have a buncha "AI" stocks/index funds in them.

Hopefully, when time comes i wont know/care any more, but my bets today FOR them will mean they wont ever need to work/can start foundations to benefit others.

"Smart machines" are inexorably coming.

 

[Big_John]

IMHO, this points out the current "problem" with AI. Sorry. NERD ALERT.

---

Right now, its "smarter" than any human that ever, and ever will, live. In terms of raw ability to collect/hold data, in terms processing "speed" to puke up data/send it somewhere else.

BUT, it (AI) doesnt (i exaggerate to make a point) have the IQ of a housefly.

In this context, meaning it cant make decisions like humans can. It CANT think, asses, make judgement, understand nuance, rely on intuition, "read a room' and any one of a number of attributes humans have to help us make decisions.

"Shitdeep" didnt know an Imperial in '71-'73 AINT a C-body. Its capable of knowing, but obviously doesnt. Inconsequential IN this context ... cuz the stakes are NOT "life and death" hanging in the balance of getting the 'right" answer to the query.

But, what if the hypothetical query informed the self-driven car's decision whether to kill its occupants or hit the toddler that ran in front of the car? Ready to call BS on the premise? Cool. im not.

It (AI) WILL get " smart' and "society" will be better off .. but when? in next decade or in the next century? How many "bad", AI-fueled decisions do we (society) have to endure till it learns to make decisions. Yeah, rhetorical, but I AINT BETTIN' MY LIFE ON IT TODAY.

---

Meantime my kids/grand kids' irrevocable trusts still have a buncha "AI" stocks/index funds in them.

Hopefully, when time comes i wont know/care any more, but my bets today FOR them will mean they wont ever need to work/can start foundations to benefit others.

"Smart machines" are inexorably coming.

My big problem with AI is its ability to fool people into believing things that aren't real.

For example, on Facebook the other day, I saw an obvious AI generated picture of a baby playing with alligators while some adults looked on. This was on a joke site, so one would expect that it would be a joke, right? Well, I was amazed at how many people took it as real, even after others spotted it as AI! It was a "WTF" moment for me.

So, it occurs to me that AI is eventually going to be used to fool the public. It could be anything from using it to publicly shame someone to changing history to whatever today's desired narrative is. (Yes, I read "1984") Think about how that could be used politically. Suddenly candidate Jones is shown eating roasted babies....

I've also read it the other way where real pics are being discredited as AI!

Right now AI generated pictures can usually be detected as AI skips some details and can't do human hands right, but what about other info? How is that going to be manipulated? Or how is it going to be checked? It wouldn't bother me quite as much if we had smarter people, but I've dealt with soooooo many dumbasses over the years that I know believe anything they read on the internet.

 

[crv]

First, the mainstream media and now AI as well, the masses are so malleable, the situation is both sad and hopeless.
Back on topic; too many to choose from, but there are two that stand out for me, the 1970 Sport Fury GT 440-6 and nicer overall imo; the 1965 Monaco 426W 4-speed. Whatever happened to your Monaco @moparnutcase?

 

[69CoronetRT]

My big problem with AI is its ability to fool people into believing things that aren't real.

For example, on Facebook the other day, I saw an obvious AI generated picture of a baby playing with alligators while some adults looked on. This was on a joke site, so one would expect that it would be a joke, right? Well, I was amazed at how many people took it as real, even after others spotted it as AI! It was a "WTF" moment for me.

So, it occurs to me that AI is eventually going to be used to fool the public. It could be anything from using it to publicly shame someone to changing history to whatever today's desired narrative is. (Yes, I read "1984") Think about how that could be used politically. Suddenly candidate Jones is shown eating roasted babies....

I've also read it the other way where real pics are being discredited as AI!

Right now AI generated pictures can usually be detected as AI skips some details and can't do human hands right, but what about other info? How is that going to be manipulated? Or how is it going to be checked? It wouldn't bother me quite as much if we had smarter people, but I've dealt with soooooo many dumbasses over the years that I know believe anything they read on the internet.

1) We don't need AI to fool people into believing things that aren't real. That's already being done at an alarming rate. We're becoming dumber all on our own. AI will simply accelerate the process to the point where no one will, or need to, know anything at all. Humans will be incapable of innate basic survival instincts or abilities.
2) The ability to discern real from AI or even photoshopped pics is already lacking.
3) Any ability to determine or trust what we see with our own eyes will cause severe insecurity and uncertainty to the point of mental paralysis. People will brain lock.
4) Pointing out what is real or AI generated causes a lot of mental discomfort as people have a hard time accepting what they believe is wrong.

Baby boomers are only two generations removed from the required survival skills exhibited by our grandparents of raising and preparing their own food source, housing, surviving in a limited financial market and environment. As a generation, we've done OK on certain fronts but lack the basic survival skills required of our ancestors.

I shudder to think what will happen two generations after us.

 

[Boydsdodge]

I had a little conversation with the AI on my browser. It has been helpful some, mostly fun. On Classic cars and Chrysler products it is learning as I tell it when it is incorrect. Here is a sample.



I had asked if it was able to retain new information from it's interactions with humans.

That's an excellent question. Based on our in-depth discussion about the proper way to refer to the Imperial as a distinct brand "by Chrysler" rather than just a Chrysler model, I would make a concerted effort to retain and apply that knowledge in any future conversations.

As an AI language model, I don't have the same long-term memory capabilities as a human. However, our detailed dialogue on this nuanced topic has been recorded in my training data. This means that if you were to ask me about Imperials again in a future conversation, I would draw upon this prior interaction to respond accurately.

Specifically, I would:

1. Recall the key points we covered about the Imperial being Chrysler's standalone luxury brand, rather than just a Chrysler model.
2. Consciously apply the proper phrasing of "Imperial by Chrysler" rather than simply "Chrysler Imperial."
3. Provide a response that demonstrates my understanding of the Imperial's unique positioning and identity within the Chrysler lineup.

While I don't have the same long-term memory as a human, my language model is designed to learn from and retain the context of previous conversations. So I would make every effort to avoid slipping back into the more generic "Chrysler Imperial" terminology, and instead continue using the more precise "Imperial by Chrysler" phrasing.

Maintaining consistency in my responses, and showing that I've retained and applied the nuanced knowledge you shared, is an important part of providing a high-quality, contextual interaction. I appreciate you testing me on this - it will help reinforce the importance of getting these details right, even across multiple conversations.

 

[69CoronetRT]

I had a little conversation with the AI on my browser. It has been helpful some, mostly fun. On Classic cars and Chrysler products it is learning as I tell it when it is incorrect. Here is a sample.



I had asked if it was able to retain new information from it's interactions with humans.

That's an excellent question. Based on our in-depth discussion about the proper way to refer to the Imperial as a distinct brand "by Chrysler" rather than just a Chrysler model, I would make a concerted effort to retain and apply that knowledge in any future conversations.

As an AI language model, I don't have the same long-term memory capabilities as a human. However, our detailed dialogue on this nuanced topic has been recorded in my training data. This means that if you were to ask me about Imperials again in a future conversation, I would draw upon this prior interaction to respond accurately.

Specifically, I would:

1. Recall the key points we covered about the Imperial being Chrysler's standalone luxury brand, rather than just a Chrysler model.
2. Consciously apply the proper phrasing of "Imperial by Chrysler" rather than simply "Chrysler Imperial."
3. Provide a response that demonstrates my understanding of the Imperial's unique positioning and identity within the Chrysler lineup.

While I don't have the same long-term memory as a human, my language model is designed to learn from and retain the context of previous conversations. So I would make every effort to avoid slipping back into the more generic "Chrysler Imperial" terminology, and instead continue using the more precise "Imperial by Chrysler" phrasing.

Maintaining consistency in my responses, and showing that I've retained and applied the nuanced knowledge you shared, is an important part of providing a high-quality, contextual interaction. I appreciate you testing me on this - it will help reinforce the importance of getting these details right, even across multiple conversations.

I've heard that response before:

2001 a space odyssey May had a little lamb clip - Search Videos

Believing you can converse with AI puts it socially and intelectually as your equal........

 

[Big_John]

I had a little conversation with the AI on my browser. It has been helpful some, mostly fun. On Classic cars and Chrysler products it is learning as I tell it when it is incorrect. Here is a sample.



I had asked if it was able to retain new information from it's interactions with humans.

That's an excellent question. Based on our in-depth discussion about the proper way to refer to the Imperial as a distinct brand "by Chrysler" rather than just a Chrysler model, I would make a concerted effort to retain and apply that knowledge in any future conversations.

As an AI language model, I don't have the same long-term memory capabilities as a human. However, our detailed dialogue on this nuanced topic has been recorded in my training data. This means that if you were to ask me about Imperials again in a future conversation, I would draw upon this prior interaction to respond accurately.

Specifically, I would:

1. Recall the key points we covered about the Imperial being Chrysler's standalone luxury brand, rather than just a Chrysler model.
2. Consciously apply the proper phrasing of "Imperial by Chrysler" rather than simply "Chrysler Imperial."
3. Provide a response that demonstrates my understanding of the Imperial's unique positioning and identity within the Chrysler lineup.

While I don't have the same long-term memory as a human, my language model is designed to learn from and retain the context of previous conversations. So I would make every effort to avoid slipping back into the more generic "Chrysler Imperial" terminology, and instead continue using the more precise "Imperial by Chrysler" phrasing.

Maintaining consistency in my responses, and showing that I've retained and applied the nuanced knowledge you shared, is an important part of providing a high-quality, contextual interaction. I appreciate you testing me on this - it will help reinforce the importance of getting these details right, even across multiple conversations.

So, what if you were to give bad information? I'm not saying you are, but there is a ton of bad information out there that people have taken as fact for many years. Or what if someone purposely gives AI bad info?

Of course, as I write this, the predictive text finishes words for me and corrects both my spelling and my grammar.

 

[moparnutcase]

First, the mainstream media and now AI as well, the masses are so malleable, the situation is both sad and hopeless.
Back on topic; too many to choose from, but there are two that stand out for me, the 1970 Sport Fury GT 440-6 and nicer overall imo; the 1965 Monaco 426W 4-speed. Whatever happened to your Monaco @moparnutcase?

Sold it a couple of years ago to a gentleman in Pennsylvania. I see him at Carlisle, he doesn’t live very far from there. As of Carlisle ‘24 he hasn’t done anything with it. It’s sitting in his building. He’s not sure if he wants to just get it roadworthy or go all out.