fury fan
Senior Member
So on the heels of determining the best LEDs for the gauge cluster (here), the rear lighting also needed some attention. The harness on this car is quite odd in execution - it feeds the driverside brake/taillight, then exits the car via a large grommet-plug, feeds all the lights in the middle, then enters the car again to feed the passenger-side light. The backing lights and license light are harnessed from under the car, forward of the top edge of the bumper.
I cannot fathom the rationale for this, as there is a large structure inside the trunk that would’ve made for a cheaper, easier to install, and far more robust harness (not out in teh weather!). I think it only needed some clearance passages in some of the bulkheads in this structure, simple enough to do at design time. (and maybe that’s the reason - this was some sort of design oversight???)
While it wouldn’t have been fun to snake it through behind all those Caplugs, those big grommet-corks surely weren’t a treat to install on the harness and into the car either, and they still had to connect the tag and backing lites via those oval access holes. At any rate, the harness passes in/out on both sides where the red mark is, the 2 vertical ovals are the backing lites, and the blue circles are the brake/tail lights.
My approach is a little different - the new harness will tie into teh wiring under the C-pillar, be inside the trunk and routed on the ledge visible in the picture. I don’t think I’ll ever be carrying any cargo that would damage the harness from such a routing. And only the backing light connections might be vulnerable, as the brake lights are inside just as before (they have an eyebrow shield, FWIW).
A few years back I experimented with small LED modules to mount in the housings. This was due mostly to align the LEDs behind the fluting/fresnels in the lens (to prevent bright spots). The concern here is that replacement parts might be limited (I could stock up, though) but more importantly, these modules are mostly for illuminating advertising signs, and maybe not for vibration in automotive use. So even if I had spare modules, I might be changing them frequently, and this would require removing the top and bottom trim on the finish panel between lights, the whole light assembly, and then disassembling the light. Royal PITA!
I tinkered with 2 different module types - square and slender rectangle.
The rectangle (top) was more elegant for layout, and rather than use a PWM modulation for tail vs brake (another non-automotive part to fail) I elected to trigger a few modules for tail and trigger the remainder for braking (no add-on wiring devices needed). The square one on the bottom was just ugly overall for this purpose (and was wired for RGB, so needed a bunch of wires snipped and sealed.
I was able to make a combination of LEDs that would come on for tail / braking to where each one was behind a flute in teh lens and also give a somewhat-uniform pattern of which LEDs were on. This would have been much easier if the flutes were evenly-spaced side to side in the lens, but they aren’t. The flutes are uniform in width, but due to 2 small reflectors attached to teh inside surface of the lens - the flutes are not consistently spaced.
By electing to illuminate 3 modules for tail and the rest for brake, I had equal-to-better lighting output. I considered that the brakelight might’ve been too bright for nighttime use, but it ended up not mattering - I changed direction.
This current approach is much simpler. I cannot claim the idea - someone else on here posted a pic of something similar in a 65 Chrysler - I think maybe it was @300rag? I didn’t like it as much when I saw it, as it does not fill the lens like the modules do. But it grew on me as it would likely be successful - we must not let ‘perfect’ get in the way of ‘good’, right?
It’s a standard LED light for truck/trailer use with an oval mounting flange. Due to being automotive-rated, and made for solid-mounting, it should be trouble-free. It would still be the PITA to replace the light, but likelihood should be much lower? It does ‘suffer’ from double-lensing, but I think it should be a minimal reduction in illumination, if at all. Certainly will be better than the degradation in a +50 year-old reflector on an 1157 bulb.
When I disassembled my original lights, I found they had been ‘restored’ inside with a glued-in layer of aluminum foil, or maybe metallized duct tape. And some extra holes in the bottom - perhaps for drainage due to leaky gaskets?
So I scraped everything off, rotary-brushed them, etch-primed, and then 2 coats of generic silver. Didn’t need to be reflective in this case. And I spent only 20-30 mins on this step.
Installation of the flange-mounts was simple - using ¾” thick wood on both sides of teh LED’s lens got it centered - almost. The bottom of the housing slopes upward ever so slightly, so using the wood spacer on the top was the method I used.
One of the benefits of all this is replacing a severely-cracked license plate light. I didn’t know how bad it was - pieces were falling as I removed the 2 screws. I bought a 4-pack of these to use as forward-facing, bottom-edge-of-dashboard lights. With a little oversizing of holes, it fit nicely.
I cannot fathom the rationale for this, as there is a large structure inside the trunk that would’ve made for a cheaper, easier to install, and far more robust harness (not out in teh weather!). I think it only needed some clearance passages in some of the bulkheads in this structure, simple enough to do at design time. (and maybe that’s the reason - this was some sort of design oversight???)
While it wouldn’t have been fun to snake it through behind all those Caplugs, those big grommet-corks surely weren’t a treat to install on the harness and into the car either, and they still had to connect the tag and backing lites via those oval access holes. At any rate, the harness passes in/out on both sides where the red mark is, the 2 vertical ovals are the backing lites, and the blue circles are the brake/tail lights.
My approach is a little different - the new harness will tie into teh wiring under the C-pillar, be inside the trunk and routed on the ledge visible in the picture. I don’t think I’ll ever be carrying any cargo that would damage the harness from such a routing. And only the backing light connections might be vulnerable, as the brake lights are inside just as before (they have an eyebrow shield, FWIW).
A few years back I experimented with small LED modules to mount in the housings. This was due mostly to align the LEDs behind the fluting/fresnels in the lens (to prevent bright spots). The concern here is that replacement parts might be limited (I could stock up, though) but more importantly, these modules are mostly for illuminating advertising signs, and maybe not for vibration in automotive use. So even if I had spare modules, I might be changing them frequently, and this would require removing the top and bottom trim on the finish panel between lights, the whole light assembly, and then disassembling the light. Royal PITA!
I tinkered with 2 different module types - square and slender rectangle.
The rectangle (top) was more elegant for layout, and rather than use a PWM modulation for tail vs brake (another non-automotive part to fail) I elected to trigger a few modules for tail and trigger the remainder for braking (no add-on wiring devices needed). The square one on the bottom was just ugly overall for this purpose (and was wired for RGB, so needed a bunch of wires snipped and sealed.
I was able to make a combination of LEDs that would come on for tail / braking to where each one was behind a flute in teh lens and also give a somewhat-uniform pattern of which LEDs were on. This would have been much easier if the flutes were evenly-spaced side to side in the lens, but they aren’t. The flutes are uniform in width, but due to 2 small reflectors attached to teh inside surface of the lens - the flutes are not consistently spaced.
By electing to illuminate 3 modules for tail and the rest for brake, I had equal-to-better lighting output. I considered that the brakelight might’ve been too bright for nighttime use, but it ended up not mattering - I changed direction.
This current approach is much simpler. I cannot claim the idea - someone else on here posted a pic of something similar in a 65 Chrysler - I think maybe it was @300rag? I didn’t like it as much when I saw it, as it does not fill the lens like the modules do. But it grew on me as it would likely be successful - we must not let ‘perfect’ get in the way of ‘good’, right?
It’s a standard LED light for truck/trailer use with an oval mounting flange. Due to being automotive-rated, and made for solid-mounting, it should be trouble-free. It would still be the PITA to replace the light, but likelihood should be much lower? It does ‘suffer’ from double-lensing, but I think it should be a minimal reduction in illumination, if at all. Certainly will be better than the degradation in a +50 year-old reflector on an 1157 bulb.
When I disassembled my original lights, I found they had been ‘restored’ inside with a glued-in layer of aluminum foil, or maybe metallized duct tape. And some extra holes in the bottom - perhaps for drainage due to leaky gaskets?
So I scraped everything off, rotary-brushed them, etch-primed, and then 2 coats of generic silver. Didn’t need to be reflective in this case. And I spent only 20-30 mins on this step.
Installation of the flange-mounts was simple - using ¾” thick wood on both sides of teh LED’s lens got it centered - almost. The bottom of the housing slopes upward ever so slightly, so using the wood spacer on the top was the method I used.
One of the benefits of all this is replacing a severely-cracked license plate light. I didn’t know how bad it was - pieces were falling as I removed the 2 screws. I bought a 4-pack of these to use as forward-facing, bottom-edge-of-dashboard lights. With a little oversizing of holes, it fit nicely.