Thanks @saylor , I'm calling that as close to an agreement as I will find on this subject. The sensors required to make it all work should be common enough items (probably scaled from a GM bowtie product) and I would hope to see availability for many years.@cantflip - i want to agree with you on the repair ease/longevity of the electronics, but i just cant. to me it is no different than the very parts we are trying to fix. it may become 'frozen in time' where you can no longer update it as is, due to revision and improvement, etc. or say the CPU dies and you have to go find a used CPU of that generation to swap - just like now, clock is dead = find a new clock to swap in.
this may be a topic where old hats and new hats are gonna take sides lol.
try not to die -
- saylor
The control module may turn out to be way different if you need a replacement 2 years later... or have morphed into something else entirely. Lots of automotive apps for Palm Pilots didn't survive and different sources brought out smart phone replacements eventually, but there is a risk expecting electronic platforms to have any real longevity. If you catch the sweet spot, you have maybe a decade of common use before the next generation takes over entirely.
The only safe way to view this is that you are consciously devaluing the car. For a shop to do these mods for a paying customer, there may be some profit... but an owner/builder needs a TV show for anyone to think this stuff is worthwhile. Too many folks believe television, and think they should get a return... they generally have done the opposite.As soon as you deviate from stock, you fall into the "restomod" category. Everyone has their own reasons for doing this (safety, aesthetics, etc.), as well as how deep into the "mods" they are willing to go. Another aspect to consider is resale value. Many sellers are frustrated when prospective buyers don't share their vision of how the mods have enhanced a cars value.