When I converted my 66 300 I used the 1967 -68 Disc brake booster and master cylinder and converted it to the dual braking system with an adjustable proportioning valve in the rear line.Well since this post has been brought back from the dead I guess I'll ask here, Ive been wanting to doing the scarebird front disk upgrade, but my 65 Fury is on a manual drum set up. So what Booster and Master Cylinder do I need? and where should I pull the vacaum from? Do I need to drill a hole in the intake manifold or is there another way?
I did a dual MC. I also used a proportioning valve. That did not stop the car. By all means, get a dual diaphragm power booster from an Imperial with disk brakes. That works.Well since this post has been brought back from the dead I guess I'll ask here, Ive been wanting to doing the scarebird front disk upgrade, but my 65 Fury is on a manual drum set up. So what Booster and Master Cylinder do I need? and where should I pull the vacaum from? Do I need to drill a hole in the intake manifold or is there another way?
That is exactly what I did, I welded a stub off the end of the pushrod for the brake lights. My MC pushrod was adjustable, so I had no issues there.Hey guys,
Got the discs and calipers installed fine, now to the MC and booster. I noticed that the push rod on the old MC/booster assembly is about 0.75-1" longer than the '67 Fury one I bought from RockAuto. Also, the original had a 1" rod past the bolt hole on the pushrod to trigger the brake light switch. Jake, I'm curious what you did about these two issues.
There's a chance that the length will be fine and the pedal will just be a bit further out. I could also just tack weld a little rod onto the end of the pushrod to hit the brake pedal switch. But I wonder if I can swap pushrods?
calipers on wrong side?I too have just installed my Scarebird conversion. I tried to keep the original MC and booster, but I am having trouble getting peddle. I have replaced all lines with a Inline tube set. Looks great, just need a good peddle. What have I done wrong?
I got a MC from a Chrysler that has disks on the front. 67 300 works great. Sorry I did not get back sooner.sczuylevch, I believe upgrading the master cylinder isn't optional. I don't know what the diameter of the stock drum master is but the calipers are designed for a master of just over an inch, maybe 1.125". I suspect you'll have to upgrade the master to the '67-'68 one. There's also an issue of brake fluid capacity.
The mystery in my mind is the booster. I'll be using the stock single booster with an 8.875" diaphragm. I have a sneaking suspicion that this won't be adequate for the discs but I'm keeping my fingers crossed. When I finally drive this car again in the next 5-10 years (ugh hopefully not) I'll let you know how it feels.
The main reason that the 1967 - 1968 disc brake master cylinder and Power booster are so rare now is that they are the best design for converting a drum brake vehicle to disc brakes. You may have to go thru hell to find them and have them rebuilt, but there in none better that will fit older "C" bodies.I got a MC from a Chrysler that has disks on the front. 67 300 works great. Sorry I did not get back sooner.
The reservoir for the front brakes is to small and may run out of fluid as the pads wear. Plus it has residual pressure valves in front and back you will only need them on the rear brakes.I have a 1969 plymouth fury with 4 wheel power drums.my master cylinder is a 2 chamber can i use that with the scarebird conversion.