Buster Hyman
New Member
Should last line of blue fury's post
Sorry, I couldn't help myself...I do appreciate all the support.
I have two interviews tomorrow. Wish me luck. I hate interviews.
If it is a larger company they will use behavioural style questions based on the premise that the best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour. Therefore make sure you go in with plenty of specific examples from your previous work history of good job performance, teamwork and initiative i.e. something that you are proud of and ideally received recognition for. Try to avoid generalisations and hypothetical answers. If you are asked what your salary expectations are be honest and give them an acceptable range. That way they won't waste your time and you won't waste theirs. A good wrap up question is "Do you have a target date to make a selection for this position?" Thanking the interviewers for the opportunity with a good eye contact and a handshake is also a good idea at the end.
You obviously haven't been on the other side of the table. He won't see an offer.NO. NO. NO. Do not get trapped with the range question. You can't see the invisible pile of money on the table in front of you. When you try to guess, you almost always guess low.
You obviously haven't been on the other side of the table. He won't see an offer.
We can't even agree. I will do my best. I know what I can and can't do. I do appreciate all your help. The question would be, would Stan hire me?
Pablo has held his rates for 12 years now. If he goes up, I'll give you a call.The question would be, would Stan hire me?
Not at all. If the interview went well and the requested range was within reason an offer is still likely. What a potential employer is trying to do is weed out candidates with unreasonable expectations. If the company range is 65-75K and the candidate came in at 55 - 65 or 75 to 85 he'd still see an offer if the hiring manager felt he was otherwise the best candidate. Whereas if he is looking for 85 - 95 the likelihood of coming together is slim and further discussions would be pointless. Candidates who are evasive when answering any question will get knocked down a peg in the post interview assessment. All this is assuming that you are dealing with a large company with formal recruitment processes. If not, candidates are flying by the seat of their pants.Again - Answering the range question tells them exactly the LEAST amount of money you will take.
Not at all. If the interview went well and the requested range was within reason an offer is still likely. What a potential employer is trying to do is weed out candidates with unreasonable expectations. If the company range is 65-75K and the candidate came in at 55 - 65 or 75 to 85 he'd still see an offer if the hiring manager felt he was otherwise the best candidate. Whereas if he is looking for 85 - 95 the likelihood of coming together is slim and further discussions would be pointless. Candidates who are evasive when answering any question will get knocked down a peg in the post interview assessment. All this is assuming that you are dealing with a large company with formal recruitment processes. If not, candidates are flying by the seat of their pants.
30 years. Prior to that I was the hiring manager out in the plant. Now retired.Are you a former HR type?
Larger organisations always have both present for good reason.especially when a candidate is talking to a real decision maker and not some HR person.
30 years. Prior to that I was the hiring manager out in the plant. Now retired.
Larger organisations always have both present for good reason.