Uncle Charlie's Fury

commando1 · Feb 9, 2015

I'm.......
Stupified.

TNTrooper428 · Feb 9, 2015

polara66hardtop said:
again a beautiful car. Floor console 67-73 C bodies are in the less then 1% of all made. Then add 440 HP? Uncle Charlie did the Mopar world a big favor, showing how they looked then.,

Correction, it is a center console, between the two bucket seats. :i hate smilies:

BlueVenger22 · Feb 9, 2015

Wow, that is a beautiful car. I wouldn't change a thing. Congrats!

furyfinn · Feb 10, 2015

polara71 said:
i want it!!

And you just propelled yourself to a high position on the "you suck" list.....

x 2!

Mr C · Feb 10, 2015

Wow. Uncle Charlie had taste.

Rwc · Feb 10, 2015

wow! Next time someone says "you cant have everything" this car should be pointed out. What ever is missing from it is probably not a very significant option.

detmatt · Feb 10, 2015

What's not to like? 138,000 very well cared for miles, well done uncle Charlie!

tallhair · Feb 10, 2015

I'm really looking forward to those interior pictures

DCMC · Feb 10, 2015

Great looking car! Elegant looking but with attitude. Hope you are grooming a younger family member to take over someday.

chry73luv · Feb 10, 2015

commando1 said:
I'm.......
Stupified.

Few cars leave me speechless.........but this one does. I have never seen such a unique car with such great options. This is a rare keeper for sure and you are very lucky . Hold on to this one because you won't run across another one.

miket · Feb 10, 2015

Beautiful car! Love it.

bluefury361 · Feb 10, 2015

Beautiful, I'm tempted to drive the 200 miles to Memphis just to look at it ....... Welcome to the "you suck" list.

There is a great MOPAR show in Soddy Daisy, (north of Chattanooga), in May and I know they would love to see this car. It's heavy on C body's and Imperials, as well as forward look cars. Check for info in the events thread.

Will.

300rag · Feb 10, 2015

That is a beauty!

saforwardlook said:
...
All I would do is take off the fender skirts and enjoy it! ...

I will disagree. I don't think it would be right without the skirts.

bluefury361 · Feb 10, 2015

300rag said:
I will disagree. I don't think it would be right without the skirts.

I agree, it needs the skirts. Their part of the design.

mr. fix it · Feb 10, 2015

Skirts gets my vote as well ! :yes:

Love Shack · Feb 10, 2015

mr. fix it said:
Skirts gets my vote as well ! :yes:

Skirts are always an eye-catcher for me. They also look great on cars.

saforwardlook · Feb 10, 2015

Skirts make the backend look heavy and more like a street sweeper or some kind of vacuum cleaner rather than a relatively fast U code C body. I took them off my 71 New Yorker two door as well, also with a U code engine, and it didn't look as heavy as this one with them on. But otherwise a fantastic design - the front end is one of their best ever IMO.

fc7_plumcrazy · Feb 10, 2015

saforwardlook said:
Skirts make the backend look heavy and more like a street sweeper or some kind of vacuum cleaner rather than a relatively fast U code C body. I took them off my 71 New Yorker two door as well, also with a U code engine, and it didn't look as heavy as this one with them on. But otherwise a fantastic design - the front end is one of their best ever IMO.

All I can say is I agree 100% with every detail Steve mentioned

Carsten