View attachment 63693View attachment 63694
View attachment 63695
I disagree with both the improved dash on a '71 and the seats. The '69 - '70 dash has much more appeal to me, the layout and the dash pad that loops around to give the lower brow look way better than the flatness of the '71-'72 Chrysler. I also think both the '69- '70 have nicer upholstery than the '71 plus the low back bucket seats with the pill shaped headrests look sportier on these cars than the high back buckets. I think '70 nose and tail look best, though I'm not a big fan of the 300H. I do think that the '71 300 grille is very tough looking though they should have kept the turn signals in the grille, the '71 tail light trim bezels were just a easy way to change up the look a little bit, they look pretty good and go with the overall appearance of the car. The '69 does have a nice nose but the tail is definitely my least favorite, it was a transition year, I don't really like the deck with the body line nor do I like the way the lid and QP extensions drop further down in the back to meet the tail lights mounted above the oddly angled bumper with the reverse lights incorporated into it, additionally the lack of a valance panel makes the car look kind of square in the back. Overall '69's look very nice but in my opinion the back of the car received a much needed redesign for the 1970 model year.