heyoldguy
Member
I personally did the FBBO dyno test with the log manifolds and the HP ones. Gained 2 lb-ft of torque at 2,700 rpm from 403 to 405 and 4 HP from 272 to 276 @ 4,300 rpm.
I personally did the FBBO dyno test with the log manifolds and the HP ones. Gained 2 lb-ft of torque at 2,700 rpm from 403 to 405 and 4 HP from 272 to 276 @ 4,300 rpm.
Sorry for the wrong numbers glad you piped up the record straight.I personally did the FBBO dyno test with the log manifolds and the HP ones. Gained 2 lb-ft of torque at 2,700 rpm from 403 to 405 and 4 HP from 272 to 276 @ 4,300 rpm.
They would make sense as part of a modest upgrade package for the street i.e. better pistons, rockers, cleaned up heads, intake and exhaust manifolds, 2.5" exhaust with cross over. All in you might gain 10-15% better output over stock. Just as a single add on item hardly worth it. But as mentioned they look cool....So basically zero noticeable improvement.
Kevin
Are they much different from what I have on my 69 440 when viewed from above?
Those look like HP to me.Are they much different from what I have on my 69 440 when viewed from above?View attachment 84083
Really? How can I prove it if true??
Maybe it's the angle of the picture, but yours looks like it has the arc up from #1. This is the regular log - fairly level across the top.Well then I will ask what stock manifolds look like then?
Are they much different from what I have on my 69 440 when viewed from above?View attachment 84083