Mark Pifer
Member
Thank you too.
Gotta keep focus on your goals. First one I've seen worthy of letting go of a very cool collection for.
2022 Dodge Challenger SRT Jailbreak
View attachment 578304
View attachment 578305
View attachment 578306
You have how many old cars in need of attention in your fleet?A wise sage on this site whom I know pretty well advised me in the past: "do not sink large amounts of cash into depreciating assets" - so that is the big question here, are these vehicles going to become the future Dodge Daytonas or Plymouth Superbirds? With the EV wave coming on us strong, and given that they are probably going to be faster than these plus the use of petroleum products dwindling and the availability of techs who know how to work on these beasts declining probably big time, are these vehicles even going to be valuable in another 10 years?
But if you have the resources, then live for today is also an option..............................as this particular "Jail Break" is really nice! There is clearly some very capable folks at Stellantis these days - that is a work of art and engineering plus imagination!
You have how many old cars in need of attention in your fleet?
EVs aren't going to phase out ICE cars in the near future, and probably not even in the distant future. It will progress, but not near the speed they keep hyping. The demand isn't there, no matter what they claim. GM just announced a new line of gasoline engines for their trucks, so much for all electric, you don't invest that kind of money for a fifteen year run.
Gas isn't going anywhere in the next fifty years. Hydrogen isn't practical for any long distance travel.
Will these last generation of Chargers and Challengers be collectible? All I know is used examples with 20-30k miles are going for about what they sold for new, people know they aren't making them more, and demand is still high.
I got mine because I knew the door was closing, and for the next few years prices will remain high. Got a good deal for a car I wanted, and will keep forever. Got lucky it was local as well.
But yes, living for today is what it's all about. Money isn't real, so why not go have some fun with an exciting car. It's changed the way I look at my fleet, and what my goals are.
I am in more agreeance with what @LocuMob is saying about the future of ICE cars than what we are being brainwashed to believe about EV's.
Are EV's cleaner? Yes. Are they quicker? Yes. Will they become more mainstream? Yes. But unless the EV manufacturers reevaluate the price point to income levels of the average citizen, I don't see any clear path for the affordability compared to ICE vehicles. (Even though ICE vehicle pricing is becoming just as bad)
Sure, there are less expensive EV cars, but who wants to be driving around in an ugly, jellybean looking car or socker mom SUV? Not me. Any of the EV's that have nice styling are either at, or over the $100K price tag range.
Stellantis is investing millions into the V6 Hurricane, so they either must know the ICE will be around for many years to come or are recognizing some of the shortfalls in profitability over the EV's.
Going back to whether or not the ICE cars will hold their value, I believe they will. Even more so for the performance models over the V6 low end rides. However, I didn't buy the Scat Pack as an investment, but because of excitement it creates when you're behind the wheel, not to mention it's such a well-built, great looking car to have with a plenty of power right under your foot.
As far as the fading number of people who will be around to work on an ICE vehicle is just another fallacy, at least for now and the foreseeable future. Over on Challenger Talk, they've got almost 90,000 members. I'm sure the Charger forums have just as many, if not more. So, there's overwhelming interest in these cars for sure.
Besides, take a look at this forum's membership as a barometer. We're all working on 50-year-old cars, and there is still has plenty of interest and know-how.
I missed the height of the 60's/70's muscle car era by about 6 or 7 years. Luckily, all of us are living in a true muscle car era right now. Unfortunately, this last hurrah is coming to an end too as it did 50 years ago.
I know I won't be around in another 50 years from now, but you only live once. May as well enjoy the time we are here. View attachment 578325
Not yet, here's your chance.Maybe I missed something, but did the wagons find a new home?
Search Servprolara and you'll see the '69 wagon. I'll have to look for the '70 pictures.Since we missed out on the '67 Chrysler wagon, where would I find pics of the two '70 wagons?
What's going on in the industry right now related to the EV evolution is that too many people are looking at these alternative forms of transportation through their rose-colored glasses.I believe you guys that think EVs are going to be high priced in the not too very distant future are out of touch with what is going on in the industry currently. The future of batteries is not todays technology, rather it is solid state technology and it will likely be here before 2030. Todays EVs are high priced because they are new and the well-heeled can afford to buy the first ones out, but the profit margins on these cars are currently through the roof. I would strongly suggest you look at this video to see what the reality today really is and just how much money Tesla, for one, is making off of their EVs. It is eye-popping.
I for the most part agree w/ Tim's assessment of the current projections on EV car costs. Here is a perspective not as well addressed. The most common failure item is the battery itself. Even if the cost were to come down from the average of 7000.00 to 9000.00 for battery replacement, how many EV owners could absorb such maintenance costs. I have seen the results of the service life of Toyota Priuses render them to throw away cars. A EV car that is disposable after 5 years is simply no bargain for the average American who are used to automobiles the have a lifespan of 10 to15 years on the average. Middle American households would not be able to buy operate and replace or repair there EV under those conditions. Add to that electric resources used by EV cars are controlled by in large city or county municipalities. As mentioned in other posts is the US electrical grid is already in large municipalities overloaded. California is a good example of what we can look forward to. The current US infrastructure is simply inadequate to support an EV mode of transportation. My own personal favorite is EV cars at rush hour w/ dying batteries in gridlock.What's going on in the industry right now related to the EV evolution is that too many people are looking at these alternative forms of transportation through their rose-colored glasses.
The additional costs both individually and environmentally of transitioning to a nationwide transformation to EV's are far more significant than continued usage of fossil fuels.
Nobody is talking about the natural resources it takes to create a single EV, or the hazardous disposal that we will face in the future. Where are all those people? Only talking point most see is "it will save on fuel costs" or "its clean energy".
America has one the cleanest air quality numbers in the industrialized the world, and we're constantly told by our leaders that we must eliminate fossil fuels, while all the political hacks who keep lining their pockets know very well that China is the biggest polluter of all.
[/URL][/URL]
Operating an EV is becoming more costly than an ICE vehicle, and the further we lean towards the dependency of electricity, the suppliers of electricity will gain further control of their monopolies and squeeze even more of the hard-earned dollars out of our pockets. Sure, oil companies can do the same and charge more, but fuel, for the most part by the average consumer, is used to move our vehicles from point A to point B.
On the other hand, the use of electricity encompasses far more resources we use on a daily basis. With the added dependency on EV's, we can only expect it will force everyone to change their daily routines, that will only further reduce our freedoms.
As many are aware, just recently in the green capital of the United States, the governor of California asked its residents to refrain from charging their electric vehicles because of deficiencies in the power grid, and probably some other political factors as well.
When I look at the big picture, all I see with everyone running out to get on the EV bandwagon with some getting rid their ICE vehicle to go with an EV, and not even taking into consideration the weak infrastructure of our grid, I wonder if they ever heard of the old adage of putting the cart before the horse.
Governor Gavin Newsom urges Californians to "do their part" and limit energy use -
I think it's great Elon is making a ton of money selling the Tesla model. Capitalism at its best. His increase in Telsa's profits probably saw an additional bump when he moved from CA to TX.
Anybody can believe what they want, but there's always two sides to every story.
WTF does this have to do with Wyatt's fleet of cars? I'm mad at myself for participating. If you want to talk EVs, go to the two or three threads already running about them. Let's get back to Wyatt's wagons.If naysayers of EVs really think multi billion $$ Corporations just pull their decisions out of the air or wherever without an intense evaluation of all the issues by scores of specialists who have looked comprehensibly in matters deciding their futures, you are very naive. Cherry picking issues by arm chair experts doesn't really gain much insight to the big picture. But I do also realize if two arm chair experts agree, then the matter is settled.