Spot welds, rivets and screws were all used. Screws were common on Newark cars. A lot of the build tags also had pre-drilled holes for screws.
Dave
Dave
My 2 cents worth, the tag has bee. Off, but the screws aren't the deciding factor.... Here's a few untouched tags with screws.....my Newark DE built 73 also has screws...
View attachment 314321 View attachment 314322 View attachment 314323 View attachment 314324 View attachment 314325 View attachment 314326
My 70 Fury was built in the Belvedere plant and my fender tag was screwed on.Belvedere was the only plant that used rivets during this time frame. The car in question is from the Belvedere plant.
My 70 Fury was built in the Belvedere plant and my fender tag was screwed on.
Back in the 1950s and '60s, if you were in the right place at the right time, you may have been able to acquire a prototype car. My dad (who worked over 30 years at Chrysler) owned a 1960 Plymouth station wagon prototype for a few years in the early 1960s. It had hand-hammered sheet metal and a unique front bumper - different than the regular production model. I'm sure that by the 1970s, the prototypes were all crushed before the public could get them, due to liability concerns.where any factory, Mopar included, sold prototypes or experimentals
70 only manifold for sure.Surprised no one has any comments about the driver side Hi-Po exhaust manifold.
Is that correct for the year? (heat stove fins)
I'd vote no.
At this point in time, WE know better. But those "bought it that way, from the dealer" (presuming the factory built it that way) stories never die. IN which case, as the car was known to be "special", any factory documentation/window sticker should have been saved.
Hindsight says you are correct, but that's not how things were.
My convertible is a example. I stopped by the dealer on Sept 25, 1969 when they pulled sheets off the new cars to reveal the fancy new 1970 models. I was driving a 1968 Fury 318 convertible at the time and I was really interested in the "same" car with a bigger engine. Well one look at the Fury GT in the show room had me in the little sales booth trying to convince the salesman to write up a GT convertible with a 6-pack. No could do, but I could get a loaded Fury III with a 440 which the sales dude assured me I could update to 6-pack and swap out the grill for a Sport Fury type. So I bought it and never did get around to any swaps. Life got in the way.
Who knew that I was a member of a small group of nutcases who special ordered Fury convertibles with big 440 gas guzzlers just when fuel prices went crazy. So no paperwork survived, except the order/invoice. Because film camera pictures were really expensive to process, no more than 5 or 6 pictures exist showing the Fury in the back ground.
Move forward 25 years to when I decided to restore the car. I discovered it was a C-body and nobody had parts plus the resale market value was crap I discovered they only made 1952 convertibles and as far as I could discover one with a 440 was ultra rare. After over 20 years of active searching I've found 7.
My point is I never realized what I had and didn't save any documentation. Well not totally true, I grabbed a showroom brochure and shelled out $10 at the parts counter for a service manual. Looking back, the 440 has been the car's saving grace simply because I loved driving the car. If it had been a 318 or 383 it would have been crushed 25 years ago!
Surprised no one has any comments about the driver side Hi-Po exhaust manifold.
Is that correct for the year? (heat stove fins)
I'd vote no.
Heat stove is found on the 71 as well, my GT has it. Part number is right for 71 as well.70 only manifold for sure.
Heat stove is found on the 71 as well, my GT has it. Part number is right for 71 as well.