I looked up the Porter muffler site. Sorry not spending $200 for Cherry bombs. Last in the salt? Your New Yorker won't last in the salt. Check this muffler builder out. Classic Chambered Exhaust Inc. - Home Page
Jeezes. My last set of Cherrybombs were this priceI looked up the Porter muffler site. Sorry not spending $200 for Cherry bombs. Last in the salt? Your New Yorker won't last in the salt. Check this muffler builder out. Classic Chambered Exhaust Inc. - Home Page
Ha Ha.
Even more impressive when you factor in that when actually measured, that 8.2:1 advertised CR is closer to 7.5:1.My desire was to get some "new tech" in combustion chamber design, which the Edelbrocks appear to have. By the same token, using "quench dome" pistons might work just as well, effectively making an open chamber design into a more-desirable closed chamber design with plenty of "quench/squish" orientations.
One other possibility is using 1.6 ratio roller-tip rocker arms, but keeping the total valve lift below about .450" at the same time. Reason is that the 1.6 ratio will move the valve off-seat faster than a 1.5 rocker will. Not sure if there might be a crossover point as to which one is best for peak power or if it might really matter on a more-stock motor at 2500rpm?
I ran across a POWERNATION segment where they dyno'd a "motor home 440", to see what it would do before they started doing their "stuff" to it. It was amazing how much torque it produced below 3500rpm. We were all surprised! In spite of its 8.2CR "worn" condition. Which can tend to support my orientation that the existing cam is pretty good, as is the head port flow, as Chrysler built them all to work together (seemingly better than other OEMS did back then).
Enjoy!
CBODY67
I like the way you think !Even more impressive when you factor in that when actually measured, that 8.2:1 advertised CR is closer to 7.5:1.
If you are "tight" on funds, a hone, re-ring and bearings with a new timing chain and valve job, can get you almost as good as new for not a lot. Using a good double roller timing set with the extra keyways will allow you to advance the cam 4 degrees which will make a noticeable difference in bottom end power and it's pretty much free. That 4 degrees really wakes up a smogger.
Kevin
ill check them out !I looked up the Porter muffler site. Sorry not spending $200 for Cherry bombs. Last in the salt? Your New Yorker won't last in the salt. Check this muffler builder out. Classic Chambered Exhaust Inc. - Home Page
Yep, the hot rod magazines of the later 1960s were full of the "braze up the slot for the mechanical advance weights" and increase the initial timing, while also eliminating the vac advance. That was the trick way to do things, according to many magazines back then. Obviously it worked, but noboey was worried about "fuel mileage" back then! Lower mpg was the price to pay for a hot rod?i have used a roller timing chain set with the advance key way in multiple B/RB engines over the almost 60 years i have been playing with this brand, that were factory stock in all other ways, and advancing the stock cam 4 degrees really wakes them up, especially the 73-78 engines.
also, playing with the factory distributor, welding up the mechanical weight slots and limiting the mechanical advance allows much more initial timing. this also makes a big difference in performance.
don't forget to play with the adjustment of the vacuum can by inserting a 3/32" allen key in the hose nipple. this will allow you to tailor the rate the vacuum advance comes in, faster or slower, eliminating pinging, surging, or hesitation.
however, this isn't a 10 minute once and done, way to tune. you have to try it, drive it, and try again if you don't like the results. the only way to know for sure, is to play with things until you have tried enough times and the car responds as good as it can get.
just my personal life experience with these cars over a long time period.
your mileage will vary.