Some of us are aware...That's right in my wheelhouse that is....
Some of us are aware...That's right in my wheelhouse that is....
The wheels in the car of the post are Cordoba style; they are not GM wheels - wouldn't fit even if they were, wrong bold pattern.Actually I think those wheels fit the car's look pretty well. If I didn't know those were GM wheels, I'd go so far to say they were quite perfect.
Me want badly.
Thanks for chiming in Carmine! I believe my offer was way more than generous considering what has to be put into the car($$$$) and not a "lowball" offer as fury fan states. Try finding out the facts before you offer an opinion on price. Having seen some more pics would you be willing to pay $4500? (fury fan). Even my offer may have been too high. Just remember a fool and his money are soon parted.
For the record, "I" posted the photos, and all offers were provisional on a test drive... the first which he didn't show up for and the second which he agreed to... and then left the state. (The car is parked at some friend's house on a bed of loose gravel, dirt and broken glass... a great trick to keep people from looking underneath.)
It will never sell to a local for $6k because a local will put their eyes on it. He's looking for an out of the area buyer. Again, $6k should get you a turn-key show Magnum OR one in similar condition to this that is a "GT", E-58, or sunroof/t-tops.
Time-out here on your 'finding facts' thing. Lots of folks were offering opinions that it looked like a great car, and then you say that you're considering the car and it has some cosmetic issues (biggest being the 3" of surface rust). And you said you offered 500 less than he was 'seeking'. And I said the seller should've taken 5500 on 6000, and also needed to be available for test drives. Then you clarified that he was willing to go down to 5000, and that's the number you were 500 further below. At that point I said 4500 on a 6000 starting price is a big gap and apparently you got offended. And then you posted the pics that Carmine took and added more details. Don't get mad at me for having an opinion that didn't agree because of info that you hadn't yet shared.
Yes, if those pics were posted earlier I would've felt differently about 5500 on this car -- but they weren't. Someone thought it was a good buy at 4500 even without a test drive (and aside from the broken grille pics I would agree with that also). Then you say you're worried about how the car was awakened. You seem to be worried about this car every step of the way, so perhaps it's just not the car for you?
IMO the biggest problem with this car is the broken grille. Most of the other cosmetics (even that surface rust) can be handled economically with a few weekends of elbow grease and be brought to a presentable condition for a 37-year-old car that was not fanatically preserved. It ain't priced like a Carlisle tent car, and the majority of the $$ it will need is maintenance items that you need to put into any old car anyway, to ensure you are making safe and reliable -- so that doesn't really count. If you can do this work yourself you'd be OK with the investment; if you have to pay shop rates, well, frankly almost any late 70s Mopar would be a very poor choice for purchase/investment.
You are entitled to the opinion that your offer is way more than generous, just as I was entitled at that time to think 4500 on 6000 was a lowball offer.
that is rust from dampness. the car appears to have been sitting either outside or in a damp garage for a long time. expect problems from the years of sitting unused.For me, the real problem here is dealing with this guy. He is not available for a test drive and he says the car was never driven in winter in those 14K original miles. Well, then, how did the underside get so rusty looking and the lower parts of the body also look like the effects of salt exposure on Michigan streets? When you go to loosen nuts and bolts on the underside or do much of any work, a rusty environment just makes things so much tougher - not worth it to me. I would rather pay more for a non-rusty car even if it had double the mileage on it. I just don't trust the guy and would move on. Nothing he has said is reliable.