68 Polara HEI Conversion

GMPolara

Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2023
Messages
56
Reaction score
34
Location
SC
I just got finished with an HEI Conversion on my 68 Polara, 383CID. At least I thought I was done. It's been burning HEI modules one after the other. I've checked for a good ground, made sure to mount with the proper heat sink and used the correct paste under the module. Also, I bought a rebuilt disty for a new mopar, a 73 Newport. Here's a link to it:
More Information for CARDONE 843897

Any ideas on what could be causing this?
Here's the diagram that I used to do this conversion:
HEI Conversion.jpg

Also, here's a link to a video showing my new system:


 
The GM HEI modules are very reliable, at least the ones from GM are, from my experience.

Is the module grounded into the dist housing? Which means the mounting flange where it mates to the block of the engine. Which then needs to be grounded to the chassis. Or you might run a direct wire from that mounting screw to the block itself.

Cardone might be the dominant player in the modern reman parts arena, BUT that does not mean they are the best choice, as others in here have noted on their other reman parts, over the years. FWIW So be prepared in case one part of the electronics might fail sooner than later.

Look at the Cardone part numbers in Rock Auto, then look at what NAPA sells. Same number, just a different location for the "-" in the part number. NAPA might cost a bit more, but they also have somebody local to you that your can look in the eye should something fail.

The other thing about their reman distributors is the advance curve. Look at all of the lines of Chrysler part numbers their ONE distributor replaces! That means one of two things . . . you are getting a generic advance curve and vac can calibration or you are getting the advance curve of the distributor that was reman'd. In either case, not the one your engine came with from Chrysler. Which means you might want to check the advance curve to see what you have, especially how that might relate to initial base timing settings.

ONE OTHER THING, by the time that HEIs were OEM on GM engines, they had also gone to electronic voltage regulators, which Chrysler didn't do until they started to use OEM electronic ignition in the early 1970s.

Perhaps you need an OEM-style electronic voltage regulator. One of the members in here sells them on eBay. Might need to upgrade.

Just some thoughts,
CBODY67
 
ONE OTHER THING, by the time that HEIs were OEM on GM engines, they had also gone to electronic voltage regulators, which Chrysler didn't do until they started to use OEM electronic ignition in the early 1970s.

Perhaps you need an OEM-style electronic voltage regulator. One of the members in here sells them on eBay. Might need to upgrade.
This is a great suggestion and possibly contributing to the problem, if you have an OEM type mechanical regulator. Most electronics are fussy about having a steady current flow. The mechanical regulator works by points opening and closing rapidly to maintain an average voltage. Electronic regulators actually do the same, except it's so much faster that the current is much steadier.

Have you bypassed the ballast resistor? Again, electronics want a solid 12-14 volts. Also, what about the coil? I think you want a coil with 1 to 1.5 ohms primary resistance. A lot of guys are running a Ford E-core type coil.

BTW, IMHO, I'm not a fan of having that coil mounted on the fender well as they did in the video. I think the strain of vibration and movement of the coil wire is worse than heat from the engine on the coil.
 
Whoops, i probably should have included more detail. I have bypassed the resistor. The ICM is grounded to a common ground on the firewall. This does have a wire connected to the back of the intake. Also. I'm using a Pertonix, Flamethrower 3. It has a very low resistance, 0.32 ohms.
The voltage regulator was upgraded to a 60amp unit. I'm not sure if it is electronic. Here's a link to what I bought. If it's not electronic then please leave a recommendation for one.
https://www.oreillyauto.com/detail/...n-12-volt-15-amp-voltage-regulator/std0/vr106

I am a bit concerned that the ignitor isn't compatible with the coil. The instructions called for a special Pertonix ignitor. I dismissed it a sales hook. Might need to reconsider.
 
Whoops, i probably should have included more detail. I have bypassed the resistor. The ICM is grounded to a common ground on the firewall. This does have a wire connected to the back of the intake. Also. I'm using a Pertonix, Flamethrower 3. It has a very low resistance, 0.32 ohms.
The voltage regulator was upgraded to a 60amp unit. I'm not sure if it is electronic. Here's a link to what I bought. If it's not electronic then please leave a recommendation for one.
https://www.oreillyauto.com/detail/...n-12-volt-15-amp-voltage-regulator/std0/vr106

I am a bit concerned that the ignitor isn't compatible with the coil. The instructions called for a special Pertonix ignitor. I dismissed it a sales hook. Might need to reconsider.
I looked at the voltage regulator and it seems to say it's electronic, but it really doesn't confirm it. More Information for STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS VR106 I looked at the Standard Ignition website and nothing positive there either. Best way to see 100% would be to pull the cover. 2 screws and you'll see what's in there.

It's a topic for another discussion, but your 60 amp alternator won't use a 60 amp regulator. All the regulator does is switch the alternator field off and on. It does not carry that 60 amp current through it. The electronic unit does smooth the switching out, therefore giving you a more constant output.

Regarding the coil. I can't find another source other than this for primary resistance and they say 1-1.5 ohms. Mopar HEI Conversion
 
 
I looked at the voltage regulator and it seems to say it's electronic, but it really doesn't confirm it. More Information for STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS VR106 I looked at the Standard Ignition website and nothing positive there either. Best way to see 100% would be to pull the cover. 2 screws and you'll see what's in there.

It's a topic for another discussion, but your 60 amp alternator won't use a 60 amp regulator. All the regulator does is switch the alternator field off and on. It does not carry that 60 amp current through it. The electronic unit does smooth the switching out, therefore giving you a more constant output.

Regarding the coil. I can't find another source other than this for primary resistance and they say 1-1.5 ohms. Mopar HEI Conversion
I'll check on that tomorrow. In the mean time I'm going to buy an E-core coil. It's easy enough to remove the coil from the equation. Thx!
 
This is a great suggestion and possibly contributing to the problem, if you have an OEM type mechanical regulator. Most electronics are fussy about having a steady current flow. The mechanical regulator works by points opening and closing rapidly to maintain an average voltage. Electronic regulators actually do the same, except it's so much faster that the current is much steadier.

Have you bypassed the ballast resistor? Again, electronics want a solid 12-14 volts. Also, what about the coil? I think you want a coil with 1 to 1.5 ohms primary resistance. A lot of guys are running a Ford E-core type coil.

BTW, IMHO, I'm not a fan of having that coil mounted on the fender well as they did in the video. I think the strain of vibration and movement of the coil wire is worse than heat from the engine on the coil.
Looks like my Regulator is point type (see pic). So now I'm on the market for an electric regulator. Any recommendations?

20240521_202630.jpg
 
I tried parts store electronic regulators on my '68 Fury and after three failed attempts I converted to a GM 1-wire alternator which has the VR built in. One heavy gauge wire from the alternator to the battery. It worked very well.

I did the same on my '68 300, replaced with a 1-wire alt, and it too works really well with the GM HEI module.

I did try converting the Mopar alternator to a "1-wire" by adding an external VR but it actually was overcharging and I could not get it down to an acceptable voltage so I put the original alternator on the shelf.

Seeing that you already went with GM HEI it seems this could be a good alternative solution. Good luck with whatever you choose.
 
I tried parts store electronic regulators on my '68 Fury and after three failed attempts I converted to a GM 1-wire alternator which has the VR built in. One heavy gauge wire from the alternator to the battery. It worked very well.

I did the same on my '68 300, replaced with a 1-wire alt, and it too works really well with the GM HEI module.

I did try converting the Mopar alternator to a "1-wire" by adding an external VR but it actually was overcharging and I could not get it down to an acceptable voltage so I put the original alternator on the shelf.

Seeing that you already went with GM HEI it seems this could be a good alternative solution. Good luck with whatever you choose.
Was the Regulator causing you to burn up HEI modules?
 
Good question, I don't know. On my Fury I did not convert to HEI. On the Chrysler I converted to HEI and the GM alternator at the same time and haven't driven more than a few hundred miles.

If you can convert to a solid state electronic VR or go with the GM alternator with one built in, it's definitely going to provide a more consistent voltage compared to a mechanical VR. As @Big_John mentioned, electronicals don't love fluctuations in voltage. That's where I would start and there are also other benefits that go along with replacing the mechanical VR.
 
Also, what voltage is your mechanical VR putting out when running at idle? At cruise speed? Over voltage could definitely be problematic.
 
UPDATE:
I've since done a few things that has gotten my charging system working.

A. Replaced the voltage regulator.
B. Bought a new coil. It's an E type coil. Specifically, a PerTronix 60115 Flame-Thrower HV Coil 60,000 Volt E-Core 1.5 ohm

The ignition is now working just fine.
 
People get excited about "cam lobe wear" of the camshaft, BUT if you put a dial indicator on the distributor breaker cam lobes, to set the point gap, you'll most probably discover that they are not all the same height. Meaning that each cyl will not have the plug fire at the exact same time as the other cyls will fire.

Until somebody starts to make NEW breaker cams (they are easily removed), the "easy way out" is a quality electronic system.

By the later 1980s, new point sets did not have the little vial of lube in them as they used to. MANY people did not know they were not getting what they needed to get with the new point sets! Result, their new points only lasted about 4000 miles, when we used to get 15K miles on them in prior times. Only real change? Everybody knew they had to wipe the grease on the breaker point cam, which then was wiped-off and held by the rubbing block's back side.

In THOSE same times, the original Chrysler Direct Connection/Mopar Perf electronic ignition conversion kit was around and of real OEM quality parts. As they were completely plug-n-play, easy to install, AND were a very good value. One modification that was that was readily-accepted by the Mopar family, too. They were everywhere and nobody worried about them NOT being of COMPLETE OEM Chrysler quality.

In more recent times, Chrysler has licensed the production of those kits. Some claim they are not the same, but as they are licensed, they must meet OEM levels of testing and performance. Another discussion for another place.

In more recent times, too, apparently there are some knock-off control boxes for the Chrysler elec system. Some of lesser quality and design. Several YT vids on those. MSD used to make a control box with a Chrysler system, the "5C", as a basic OEM upgrade unit. Neat, from the days of MSD being the original company with usually great durability.

In ANY electronic system, the distributor shaft bushings will almost never wear, by observation. Why? No sideloads put on the bushings from the breaker point rubbing block. Even well past 500K miles, from my own experience. Notice that all distributor rotors are balanced, even on point systems.

ANYTHING with electronics can fail, at some point in time. But that point in time is usually greatly elevated with good quality components, with genuine OEM being the best.

As noted, the newer condensers DO have issues, so finding older ones can be important.

ONE point I noticed, back then, was that OEM coils could go up to 30KV, rather than 20KV. As the GM HEI coils were 50KV. Small point. I have run .045" plug gaps on my point-system Chryslers with no problems. When the '66 Newport Town Sedan 383 2bbl was my daily driver, I spent an afternoon getting the spark plug J-gapped and then gapped precisely all the same at .035" gaps. On the Sunn oscilloscope at the local Chrysler dealership, the plug firing traces were all 8-9KV at idle. We never tested past that or put the engine under load. No misses, no real need to test that far. Note that an ignition coil will only produce enough voltage to fire the plug, anytime. It will not produce max voltage with every spark if it does not have to. Which makes a 50KV output aftermarket coil "a show piece" alluding to great power at WOT, when the engine only spends a great fraction of its running time at WOT.

Uncle Tony's context is accurate and reality in more cases than not. We've been oriented toward "factory stuff is bad" (due to cost-cutting and such) and aftermarket is better (in some cases), but "$$$ engineering" happens at BOTH levels of things. The OEM level has to cover almost anything an owner can throw at their car, no matter what. The aftermarket HP market items are more targeted to higher-perf applications, whether they are as robust as the OEMs or not, in reality.

The Ford DuraSpark modules were mounted away from engine heat, as Chrysler modules have always been, and "wire" pretty much the same as the GM HEI Modules. In another forum, a poster was using one on his GM points ignition system. Sourced from a salvage yard (with wiring) for about $10.00.

Dead Dog Garage also has a YT vid on how to wire-in a GM HEI module, in a very "basic" manner.

It HAS been documented that the spark output of a GM HEI module drops off a good bit past 4500rpm, which kind of alludes to "poor top rpm performance", BUT even with that lower output, it has the guts to get to 6000rpm with no misfires, in normal OEM uses, from my few experiences with such.

Sorry for the length. Just my experiences and observations from the later 1960s.
CBODY67
 
Hi! I'm a bit curious because I'm still burning HEIs. Did you keep the stock coil? Was anything done with the resister block?
 
Back
Top