70 bee

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is a style and nostalgia and an old brand loyalty for me, but you would have to really drive some of the better cars available today to realize the automobile has evolved for the better. Despite emissions and fuel economy, the power is there(and more), the ride is good, handling and braking are superior. But I don't want to buy a $60k or more car and find within a decade I still have to go to the junkyard for parts and I don't have a $20k factory scan tool to work on everything from the radio to the power windows or A/C. I have worked on and owned some of those cars and they are no better investment than a Formal, way worse if you buy them while they still have resale value.
i am talking looks, modern cars have the Drivability, older cars have the Style.
 
I'm more with Dave on this one - 70Bs were designed to appeal to the Pontiac followers of that time. A day late and more than a dollar short. Homely at best!
maybe that explains it!!! IMHO Pontiac had the most style out of all of gm's brands.
 
I always liked the 70's and that had something to do with my choice for a 72 Fury. I will admit I have owned a 64 GTO Convertible, a 66 Grand Prix, several 67 to 69 Firebirds and a 79 T/A.
 
Seeeeee

image.jpeg
 
I know I won't get any love here on this, but I agree with Dave, never have liked the front end on the 1970 Super B. I like his description as a clown face, 0% desire for ownership based on looks.

If I was going to have a 1970 Dodge, I would much rather have a Polara.
 
Weird my shop is full of new or almost new cars on any given day with issues, problems and defects, so is the Toyota store next door. Good thing, otherwise I would be looking for a new job and my Techs would have slept through school for nothing! At least when I look under the hood of the 300's I know what the hell I am looking at! Ugly or not I would take a 40-50 or 60 year old land yacht any day. Hopefully my wife agrees as she is sleeping next to one each night....built for comfort not for speed!

However.....Hellcats are freakin awesome!!! Just sayin..
 
Weird my shop is full of new or almost new cars on any given day with issues, problems and defects, so is the Toyota store next door. Good thing, otherwise I would be looking for a new job and my Techs would have slept through school for nothing! At least when I look under the hood of the 300's I know what the hell I am looking at! Ugly or not I would take a 40-50 or 60 year old land yacht any day. Hopefully my wife agrees as she is sleeping next to one each night....built for comfort not for speed!

However.....Hellcats are freakin awesome!!! Just sayin..
Planned obsolescence.
 
I always liked the 70's and that had something to do with my choice for a 72 Fury. I will admit I have owned a 64 GTO Convertible, a 66 Grand Prix, several 67 to 69 Firebirds and a 79 T/A.

The 72 Fury front end is one of the best out there. You can't compare it to the 70 Bee, one of the worst!
Now this is a worthy Super Bee - love the side scoops too!

5897517736_d9baf45f60_b.jpg
 
If you never make it past the 1st sip, you'll never know scotch. Personally I'm a glenlivit man myself! I'll send you an address to send the laphroaig tho!
 
I see a scowl on the 70 Coronet. Only one meaner looking is a 59 coronet. Would have made a better Christine IMO. It has taken many years for the 70 front end to grow on me, but now It's one of the coolest. The 72 Fury has taken a place on the list.
1970-Dodge-Coronet-Super-Bee.jpg
1959.jpg
72_gran_fury_360_blue_1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top