building a small block 4 speed c, nd help

Ok.
Imagine the zbar with only the arm that pushes the fork.
Figure the distance the fork has to pushed. eg: 3"
Position the z-bar so the arm that pushes the fork is ½ that distance CCW to 12 o'clock. eg: 1-½". The full arc of the swing will be 3".
With the z-bar now indexed correctly, look at the rod from the clutch.
Now envision how much the end of the pedal rod travels when the clutch is depressed. eg: 6"
Now you can locate the arm that the pedal rod attaches to.
Locate that arm and calculate the length of that arm so when it travels 6", it rotates the z-bar so that the arm to the fork travels 3", in this case a 2:1 ratio.
All distances are aprox.
 
PicsArt_02-03-01.11.28.jpg
Correction. I was upside down...
Ok.
Imagine the zbar with only the arm that pushes the fork.
Figure the distance the fork has to pushed. eg: 3"
Position the z-bar so the arm that pushes the fork is ½ that distance CCW to 12 o'clock. eg: 1-½". The full arc of the swing will be 3".
With the z-bar now indexed correctly, look at the rod from the clutch.
Now envision how much the end of the pedal rod travels when the clutch is depressed. eg: 6"
Now you can locate the arm that the pedal rod attaches to.
Locate that arm and calculate the length of that arm so when it travels 6", it rotates the z-bar so that the arm to the fork travels 3", in this case a 2:1 ratio.
All distances are aprox.


The arm on the z-bar that moves fork should be
ON THE BOTTOM, and
swing CCW from the 8:00 o'clock position to 4:00 o'clock position.
Sorry about the confusion. All the rest remains the same.
 
Last edited:
Master Plate 1.jpg
Master Plate 5.jpg
Master Linkage 1.jpg
I know you specifically mentioned you didn't want to go the hydraulic route but I sure have no regrets. One flex line from the master to the bearing, eliminate the over center spring etc. Admitedly there was some dicking around with MC mounting and pedal travel but it really worked out well in the end. I added a piece to the brake booster backing plate to mount the clutch master and reservoir. Space might be a factor if you have factory PB but my aftermarket booster stands off the firewall a few inches which made for more room. Good luck with your project!

Interior_dash.jpg
 
I've ran a hydraulic M/C to both a hydraulic slave for a convental throw out bearing and directly to a hydraulic T. O. bearing (twice actually - one a Timken and one a TRW. ).
I would never use a hydraulic T.O. bearing again on an A833.
Hydraulic T.O. bearings will not keep their adjustment the way they are mounted on the A833 input shaft and are a PITA to adjust for normal wear and tear.
 
I've ran a hydraulic M/C to both a hydraulic slave for a convental throw out bearing and directly to a hydraulic T. O. bearing (twice actually - one a Timken and one a TRW. ).
I would never use a hydraulic T.O. bearing again on an A833.
Hydraulic T.O. bearings will not keep their adjustment the way they are mounted on the A833 input shaft and are a PITA to adjust for normal wear and tear.
Only 800 miles so far and no problem. Maybe I will find that out at some point. The TO bearing came with a spacer that seats right against the tranny front housing so it will never move backward.
 
Only 800 miles so far and no problem. Maybe I will find that out at some point. The TO bearing came with a spacer that seats right against the tranny front housing so it will never move backward.
Does yours also thread in and out to adjust the OAL?
 
The z bar is NOT in wrong. Thank you very much. And commando THANK YOU very much i had a feeling you were explaining it upside down. I understand the ratio 8 & 4 now. So i should be able to make it work
 
Well post some pictures. The bell should not make a difference, how long is the pedal to z bar push rod, how long is the adjusting rod. This is info we need if you expect help so it can be compared to other speeder c bodies. How do I know if the z bar is in correctly, even if he claims it is.
 
Last edited:
I read through this all again. really would have recommended going hydraulic but after reading of commandos experiences i'd have to hedge. you have the factory pedal? i didn't. building the z bar was nothing. the reference points for it are all on the vehicle. make it level. index the lower arm like the commando said. 6 o'clock, the rod to throw out fork should be level. that determines the length of lower arm. upper arm basically indexed to clear firewall. factory knockout in firewall determines allowable length of upper arm. i did have to make the upper arm longer than the available space in the knockout to get the ratio needed. I put a slight bend in the rod where it passes through the firewall. it worked. no cutting. i spent more time getting the PEDAL right, but i had to fab one with no picture of the correct one and no inherent reference points. you have the correct pedal?! got a torch and a welder? this should be easy. gotta say, i'd like to post pictures but i don't really know how and am too proud to ask. real *****. i could build a whole car out of old popsicle sticks but can't post a f'in' picture. and no i don't own a cell phone. those are for you young guys. SG
 
Definantly a proud owner of a welder. And a torch. Im sure i will be able to get the swing correct one i get the clutch side of the z figured out. I do also notice some shreek remarks regarding my own smarts and weather i have it in "wrong" or correctly. Interesting since theres no such thing as a correct z bar for my setup. Amd again commando thank you for your help. It was more of a re assurance of my own thought. I do indeed have the correct pedals. For the one who asked
 
cool. torch and a welder. couple of pieces of steel. mix that with some patience and common sense. that's all you really need. oh, and a lift helps. you'll get there. SG
 
Yes however it's threaded all the way in, that combined with the additional spacer on the back makes it rigid. Only concern is the orings could fatigue over time.
I don't want to be Danny Downer but here is where the problem will begin.
As I found out, and later confirmed by others too late for me, is that as the clutch wears, you have to start unthreading (?) the T. O. bearing. The gap tween the pressure plate and the T. O. bearing is uber sensative. Guys have been finding it very hard to maintain the gap once you start unthreading it.
With a conventional T.O.bearing bearing and fork, it only takes a minute or two to adjust the road by turning the nut.
I'm hoping your setup works as long as you own the car. You made a very slick setup.
 
i can't argue with experience but as the clutch wears the fingers on the pressure plate extend back toward the throw out bearing. this would reduce any gap. actual question. how does this create an issue?
 
i can't argue with experience but as the clutch wears the fingers on the pressure plate extend back toward the throw out bearing. this would reduce any gap. actual question. how does this create an issue?
I found the the gap was critical to maintain the correct friction point. Too sensitive actually. Maybe it was my design and yours is more tolerant?
 
i didn't use hydraulics. i built a mechanical setup twenty years ago and have been living in cave since. am i reading correctly that now there's a bolt in hydraulic throw out bearing and slave assy. for antique chryslers? if so, i'd legitimately consider changing to hydraulics if the parts were any damn good and weren't a maintenance hassle. reading about your bad experiences is a bit of a dissuasion though. also, "friction point"?
 
Back
Top