Do you like many types/eras of vehicles?

Carmine

Old Man with a Hat
Joined
Feb 22, 2015
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
8,564
Location
Detroit 'burbs
The Exner thread moved off into essentially who likes “fin” cars and who doesn’t. I like all eras of vehicles, thus I’m always surprised at the amount of strong opinions regarding certain cars that fail to see them in context, or as part of the time when they were new. I’m wondering how many feel the same way. Let me give you my thoughts era-by-era. My thoughts tend to be Mopar-centric, but I am interested in all the brands until I begin to note exceptions in the 70s.

Brass Era: Fascinating to me because they are so simple, so raw and mechanical. The use of wood, primitive sand castings, leather clutches, etc. If I lived in one of those awesome-weather senior communities where folk travel to the store on side roads at 30 MPH in electric golf carts, I’d love to have one of these cars just to put around and drive to Safeway for a loaf of bread.

a_-1_1410565076_6381.jpg


20s: Still pretty simple, but cars are coming of age. First applications of new tech like hydraulic brakes or rubber engine mounts. Of course the Imperials (and other luxury cars) of the era are pure art.

packard-twin-12.jpg


30s: Now people are commuting to work daily in cars, in all weather. Things have gotten quiet enough to listen to a factory car radio. The Chrysler Airflow is way ahead of its time and an art deco masterpiece. It’s amazing to see how smooth and quiet a flathead is at idle.

chrysler-imperial-1935-2.jpg


40s: Styling takes a backseat and cars are now being used routinely for cross-country travel. Which is not to say they’re “ugly”… I would love a ’41 Plymouth, a ’42 Desoto, or but the separate sweeping fenders of the 30s are getting integrated and the emphasis seems to be on reliability and comfort.

1942-desoto.jpg


Post War: I have a ’51 Imperial. You can see why the Hemi™ was such a big deal when it was introduced. The engine of this car feels very contemporary (as carbureted engines go) and despite its semi-automatic 2-speed transmission, it keeps up with modern traffic just fine. Yet so many other areas of the car feel “quaint”. Chair-height seats upholstered in wool, pedals that pivot through the floor, a split windshield, huge whitewall tires, etc. But still a real time machine that you can drive.

5983033377_5a6b69fca6_b.jpg


Early 60s: Love me some ’61 Imperial LeBaron (and have one). 1930’s Retro floating pod headlights mixed with Space-Age fins and wild colors. Not for the shy, even in black.

images


Mid 60s-Mid 70s: So much going on in this decade, but surely I need not argue that to this crowd.

Early 80s: Smogged-up, sized down, but lots of personality. Plenty of neat 80s stuff.

rampage1_630.jpg


Late 80s: Don’t knock a turbo stick-shift until you try one. And there were still some cool rear drivers around…

983911099olympicrings1.jpg


101792d1204581488-1992-linc-mark-vii-lsc-se-nitrous-more-2850-00-im000498.jpg


Now I will admit that pickin’s get slimmer in the 90s, but Trucks and SUVs start coming on strong. I’d take any of these, and of course I did have one of them:

(1998 Jeep Cherokee 5.9 Limited; image that won't work)

ram11.jpg


By the modern era you of course have all the new Hemi, SRT, Challenger, etc. stuff. I will admit; there are now entire categories of vehicles that I detest, and would gleefully send to a shredder. Seeing them on US streets just plain makes me angry, because they look so much more at home in places like this:

Iraq1.jpg


My point is that I don’t lock into any one era of vehicle. I like the vast majority of vehicles from all different times, for many different reasons. It’s probably why I prefer “restored” or preserved vehicles vs. those that are modified. I suppose I like driving old cars for the same reason people climb rocks… Because it isn’t always easy, and the memories can be a lot of fun. But I also find much to enjoy in the modern era, maybe just the realization that there are still cars built with personality, albeit fewer each year.
 
I'm with you Carmine in regards to finding something to appreciate from each decade albeit post-war preferences for me. My first restoration was a tri-five Chev and I still love them to this day. There are plenty of other makes I can appreciate as a "Car Guy" but you never forget your first love which for me is 55-79 Mopars with honorable mention to the 80-83 Doba/Mirada/LS cars
 
been keeping it down too the ones i own , trouble is i keep buying more , lol . twenty's through the seventy now . have'nt got the room . there is more i have'nt got in to the sixties yet , lol . ya i'm car poor , but at least i'm happy !

DSC03616.JPG


DSC03442.JPG


DSC08130.JPG


DSC08127.JPG


00060016.jpg


DSC08133.JPG


DSC08177.JPG


DSC06653.JPG


DSC04743.JPG


DSC08001.JPG
 
To me each decade was an advancement over the previous one. I like the looks of each one, yet enjoy the comforts of the newer cars. That is the main reason is I am redoing my 66 300 I am upgrading to newer Chrysler innovations as I can and still keep the car looking as close to when it was made as possible.
 
Generally, I appreciate anything from before the mid 1970's, and all the way back to the early days of motoring, but when it comes to my favorites (the ones I buy, collect and lust after), my preference is for 1966 - 1968 Mopars. In all of automotive history, I guess I am very narrow minded since they all fall into that 36 month window.
But, my daily drivers are a 96 Dodge Ram pickup and a 14 Challenger if that helps broaden my horizons.
 
been keeping it down too the ones i own , trouble is i keep buying more , lol . twenty's through the seventy now . have'nt got the room . there is more i have'nt got in to the sixties yet , lol . ya i'm car poor , but at least i'm happy !

I could definitely find a few to love there.
 
I enjoy all old American iron. I consider into the 70s old Even some after I like such as the K cars and Daytonas of the late 80s. The Impala SS of the 90s the most recent Ford Marauders , that kind of stuff. I do like the simplicity of the older stuff and the technical stuff of my time.
Obviously I am into the Mopar stuff the most but I am pretty good in picking out correct years of all American makes at shows and on the street. Much better than the average car guy
 
But has anyone ever wanted to own one of these old-timey cars? I spotted this very-original survivor '51 Imperial during a Craigs search where I was probably looking for something more like a 60s-70s car. I'd never driven anything that old, so out of curiosity I checked it out. I had to get a lesson on how to drive the Fluid-Torque transmission (different than a Fluid-Drive).
48c5301e.jpg

Turned out to be a blast! Take off in low, when the engine revs, back off the gas, engine vacuum trips a switch, solenoid pulls into second, foot back on gas. (Sounds slow, but it's not bad at all. It works surprisingly well. ) Thank God nobody felt the need to "modernize" it.

You think you get looks driving 60s car? Take something like this to the grocery store. Or park it in the "Chrysler Products Only" section of the lot at work, see how many people you meet. I've even driven it from Detroit to Toledo a few times.

Never been restored, never been hacked on. This is one I'll own for a very long time.

bb83b460.jpg


I bought this car for a grand more than the typical Formal... Why so cheap? Because the widow who was selling it said her husband was always chasing off people who wanted it just for the Hemi™. I said, "Lady, look what I drove to come look at it? Do you think I'd chop it up?"

SU1HMDA2MDMtMjAxMTA2MTktMTAyNy5qcGc.jpg


Hard to believe only 30 years separates the two of them!
 
I like just about everything before about 1975. I especially like the brass era, but I'll probably never own one. I keep thinking I'd like a Model T, but I talk myself out of it.

Along with my 70 300, I have a 53 Windsor.

0612101339.jpg

0612101327.jpg


The car turned in a lot more of a project than I thought it would and I put it on the back burner a couple years ago. I had hoped to get to it this year, but that didn't happen. Maybe this coming year.
 
I guess I'll throw my two cents in here too along with some of my reasons why. I'm only going to mention North American cars and pick ups, because they have always been my main interest.

Listed from my favorite to least favorite years;

1955-72
1956%20Ford.jpg

ebay342636.jpg

75950.1964.Mercury.Marauder.jpg

1965-Chrysler-300L-Front.jpg

IMG_0562.jpg


I like the 1955-72 cars the most. IMO, they had the most styling, the most powerful engines and nearly all of my favorite options like power steering, power brakes, power windows, power door locks, power seats, AM/FM Stereo and cruise control became available or was already available during this era. With those options available and safety improvements like safety glass, dual brake systems, they had everything they needed and not a whole lot of government mandated crap that they didn't need.

1973-79

87776919_o.jpg

6214251852_135bdda612_z.jpg
1979-dodge-lil-red-express-truck-gordon-dean.jpg


I like cars from this era, even though they were not quite the cars that they had been in previous years. Engine horsepower ratings were down because of emissions, build quality was slipping, paint quality was an issue on some makes. Styling had also become a lot more bland, although a few models, like the two pictured, did manage to keep styling alive awhile longer. This was also the time when trucks began becoming very popular with the public, resulting in some interesting examples.

1949-54

1949-mercury2.jpg

1951_pontiac_chieftain-pic-5841151539872549687.jpeg

Plymouth_1953_Rick_Feibusch_2010.jpg


The cars from this era would be my next choice. They were simple, but had nice styling and would make nice projects, in my opinion.
 
1930-41

Again, these were very simple cars with style and charm. Great project potential. I'm not going any farther back than this. :)

152736_Front_3-4_Web.jpg

1932_Ford_Model_18_55_De_Luxe_Tudor_Sedan_JEH168.jpg

96342_Front_3-4_Web.jpg


2000 to Date

I either love them or hate them. Performance came back in a big way, but with modern technology, of course. Some models went "retro" with their styling, which I liked. Black boxes and technology that allows your location to be tracked is a major turn off for me. Too many mandated gadgets for my liking. Build quality did seem to improve, in general, over the cars of the 80s and 90s though.

A few that I liked.

IMG_3108.jpg

2005_00012_06.jpg
2005%20Dodge%20Magnum%20RT_6.jpg

0803_12z%2B2009_dodge_challenger.jpg


1980-92

The era of thin sheet metal, front drive econoboxes and small displacement V8s like the 255 Ford and the 267? Chevy of the early 80s. Lots of plastic, but some nice styling on some models. Here's a few of my choices from that period.

3184321507_0067a2ed06_b.jpg

1982-Parisienne-coupe.jpg

16743_e448b2d8ac_low_res.jpg

16621_d21fb7c4da_low_res.jpg



1993-2000

Not very many that I liked from this period. Here are a few that I did like.


1994_dodge_viper_2_dr_rt_10_convertible-pic-43883.jpeg

chrysler_sebring_1996_wallpapers_1.jpg

1996-chevrolet-impala-ss-left-front.jpg

49422063.jpg

001.jpg


I liked the fresh new styling of the '94 Dodge trucks.

1994_dodge_ram__1500_by_compaan_art-d4pp566.jpg
 
Early 60s: Love me some ’61 Imperial LeBaron (and have one). 1930’s Retro floating pod headlights mixed with Space-Age fins and wild colors. Not for the shy, ESPECIALLY in black.

images
Fixed that one for you Carmine.

I like much of what I see you're about when it comes to cars. I'm not quite the same, but I think we are close enough on most things automotive to have some good conversations.

I am not bound to one brand, but have a deep Mopar affection. I also love all eras of automobiles, some for different reasons. I like old stuff that works differently than today's cars do... always thought a brass T would be fun just from the "If you can drive it, you can drive it" perspective... but not a practical vehicle for today's world. I like that in a pinch I can drive anything I own, even though I would not want to subject the pretty cars to the world I commute in.

Form follows function is great, when taken in moderation. I never desired a car that resembled an F1 racer, but I did/do love a wing car for what it is. Fin era cars are either too much or just right IMO, but I truly love those that I love... Practical? Who cares!

I love technology, but I also love the "not so simple" mechanized ways similar systems once worked... in fact I am truly fascinated by some of it, I am not going to take up antique watch repair as a hobby, but can see the fascination.

Anyone who has loved their machine is a welcome addition to the car hobby... but if your love alters the car... make sure it's true love, and I will be respectful that you love and intend to keep what you have created. I can see safety and moderate performance upgrades... The over the top crowd just doesn't seem to fully understand that unless they are racing their car, they will never fully match what is available newer and cheaper. I have a mindset that does get stuck back in a time that we could "upgrade" a car to surpass the new offerings from the manufacturers... That ended a long time ago... I mostly like them to be stockish today.
 
Yeah. Going as way back as the 1930's ........
1935 Chord.jpg

1935 Chord.....Awesome for the time period.

1938-Buick-YJob-Concept2.jpg


1938-Buick-YJob-Concept3.JPG

Harley Earl's "Y" job.....1938/1940. Everyone knows about these wheels I'm sure.

1948-Tucker-48.jpg

Preston Tucker's "Tucker" car....1948. This ride had KILLER apps for it's time. Gov killed it. Shame. The middle head light "turned" with the front wheels (i think). Way ahead of the....curve.....haha.

1953 bUICK Wildcat.jpg

1953 Buick Wildcat.....yea I know, but gotta mention for effort. Love that windshield rake. I can live with what is going on in the rear.....tastefully done, kinda. If those were open slots above the wheel well for perhaps eliminating brake heat...that'd be "swell" a solution gents, lol.

yuck.jpg

Mid fifties early sixties. Can't say there's anything there. Train went of the rails for me.

Jay_Leno_1966_Oldsmobile_Tornado.jpg


07.jpg


elgato.jpg


1965 Plymouth VIP.jpg
 
I love anything that explodes several times per minute and converts that energy into motion. That leaves me appreciative of just about any vehicle. However, in 2015 I bought a new Challenger R/T Scat Pack. It's an impressive car and I love it BUT I've experienced a disconnect from the mechanisms themselves since I've owned it which has been a bummer. I'm all for what new automobiles do and respect the power they create and the efficiency with which they function but give me something I can tune without a laptop. ****, give me something I can find the damned spark plugs on!
 
cont
Jay_Leno_1966_Oldsmobile_Tornado.jpg

1966 Oldsmobile Toronado, very nice. I think its size is the only thing that "REALLY" dates it today, imo.


1969LincolnMarkIII_02_1000.jpg

69-mark-iii-black0001-801x572.jpg

1969 Lincoln Mark III. Nothing "REALLY" innovative here, it just looks cool to my eyes. Get rid of the hump and...even cooler. Pimp ride, lol. I think the low roof line is what catches my eye first. I also love those long straight front sheet metal fenders...like the fuselage cars. Yeh lots of "stylin", but hey at least it looks cool.

1990-Infiniti-Q45-Sedan-Image-02.jpg

1990 Infiniti Q 45. MEh...halfway decent looking car imo. I just dig the cool zen like commercials for this car on youtube. As far the car itself, I do believe they made an effort to design it with a ZEN like philosophy in mind but in a "mass production" scenario?, yeh, um good luck with that.



Lincon.jpg

1995 Lincoln Mark VIII. I think the front grill is "malleable". In other words it can be deformed by small pebble and rock hits and go back to its original form like rubber (I think I read that somewheres). If that's true, that is totally absolutely awesome. Not to mention the slippery shape and lack of ticky tacky elements. Has a killer V8 (for its time) under the hood also...swweet.

TS11_r328_01.jpg

Mid 1990's Chrysler "Cab forward" cars. Interesting concept. Half way decent looks. Not that fast though, sadly.

DTS.jpg

2005 Cadillac DeVille DTS. Fuselage car. Nice lines. Auto stick on the console. Sweet interior...killer North Star V8. Unfortunately from what I understand the electronics (Oxy sensors, other way expensive stuff) die rather quickly and ya can't get the thing through state inspection without spending a wads of cash...unless your an electronics engineer with Ph.D. Sad. Nice to look at, though.
 
cont
View attachment 107729
1966 Oldsmobile Toronado, very nice. I think its size is the only thing that "REALLY" dates it today, imo.


View attachment 107731
View attachment 107732
1969 Lincoln Mark III. Nothing "REALLY" innovative here, it just looks cool to my eyes. Get rid of the hump and...even cooler. Pimp ride, lol. I think the low roof line is what catches my eye first. I also love those long straight front sheet metal fenders...like the fuselage cars. Yeh lots of "stylin", but hey at least it looks cool.

View attachment 107735
1990 Infiniti Q 45. MEh...halfway decent looking car imo. I just dig the cool zen like commercials for this car on youtube. As far the car itself, I do believe they made an effort to design it with a ZEN like philosophy in mind but in a "mass production" scenario?, yeh, um good luck with that.



View attachment 107734
1995 Lincoln Mark VIII. I think the front grill is "malleable". In other words it can be deformed by small pebble and rock hits and go back to its original form like rubber (I think I read that somewheres). If that's true, that is totally absolutely awesome. Not to mention the slippery shape and lack of ticky tacky elements. Has a killer V8 (for its time) under the hood also...swweet.

View attachment 107736
Mid 1990's Chrysler "Cab forward" cars. Interesting concept. Half way decent looks. Not that fast though, sadly.

View attachment 107737
2005 Cadillac DeVille DTS. Fuselage car. Nice lines. Auto stick on the console. Sweet interior...killer North Star V8. Unfortunately from what I understand the electronics (Oxy sensors, other way expensive stuff) die rather quickly and ya can't get the thing through state inspection without spending a wads of cash...unless your an electronics engineer with Ph.D. Sad. Nice to look at, though.

LH platform was very respectable performance in it's day... got to be the 3.5L though... I spanked an era Pontiac t/a with one across Florida from Miami to Naples. I was a lot dumber then...
 
LH platform was very respectable performance in it's day... got to be the 3.5L though... I spanked an era Pontiac t/a with one across Florida from Miami to Naples. I was a lot dumber then...

Lol, I was about to say the same thing (except my story was about finding the rev limiter on the way to Murray Park's back around '96.). 3.5L was/is a great engine with a sweet sound.
 
Back
Top