Low Compression 440 Build Questions

A mild cam, intake and carb on a 440 will make 400 hp without any issues. Without a stroker kit or aftermarket cylinder heads, the jump to 500 hp is going to require porting the factory heads and probably more camshaft and a looser converter than most people would want in a C-body. You trade off street manners for horsepower if you use mostly factory parts without the stroker kit.

One of the old school 500 hp combos is a 440, 10:1 compression, ported 906 or 452 heads, a single plane intake like a Holley Street Dominator, an 850 cfm carb, 1 7/8" headers, and the .509 hydraulic camshaft. You could put a slightly smaller camshaft in it because the .509 requires 3000+ stall to be effective.
If I wanted to build a relative cheap low compression 440 to make the power you're after, I'd buy a set of higher compression pistons (like Speed Pro L2235F) and change the rod and main bearings and use a set of plain fast iron rings. Use 320 grit sandpaper to knock the glaze of the cylinder walls so the rings will seal quickly. You're looking at about $800 and you have basically a new short block. Then with the stock heads, a Holley Street Dominator intake and the camshaft linked below from Hughes Engines, you'll easily make 450+ HP.

Pistons:
CHRYSLER Sealed Power L2355F Speed-Pro Forged Pistons | Summit Racing
Camshaft:
https://www.hughesengines.com/Index...RmxhdCBUYXBwZXQsIEh5ZHJhdWxpYw==&partid=30252
can I still achieve that with the factory hp rods and pistons ?
 
If you are going to replace the rods and crank along with the pistons, go look at a stroker kit.

No replacement for displacement.
My 493 with a custom reverse dome piston, zero deck and Edelbrock RPMs came in at 8.97:1 compression. Round figures, it made 500 hp, 600 ft/lbs and is happy on all but the hottest days on 87 regular. If I were to add some RPM to the timing curve, it would probably be happy all the time. 34 degrees all in by 2000 is a little aggressive.

Kevin
 
If you were just wanting to wake up your current combo without a rebuild, a new timing set with the extra keyways so you can advance the cam 4 degrees plus a performance distributor recurve will get you some amazing gains for very little money.

A stock iron Thermoquad intake is more than enough for a tweaked stock combo and you said you have 3.23s.

2.5" duals to finish and it's going to be much harder on rear tires.

Kevin
 
If you have a sound motor then minor upgrades will surprise you.

Recurve the distributor for more initial and a quicker curve.Use vacuum advance.

2.25 minimum dual exhaust and 2.5 is fine also. Mufflers up to you but I like the longest case dynomax Super Turbo for better flow and not loud.

Don't need HP manifolds.Money better spent on headers or use the logs. I have run the Hedman shorty headers and the Hooker Super Comp 1 3/4 tubes on c bodies. The TTi 1 7/8 are too big for most C body engines. I would not be opposed to the Schumacher tri y either but have not run them on a c body.

If you get into modifying the engine I would rather have a good set of ported heads with a stock Cam than a bigger cam and stock heads. Airflow is power.Period.

Stock intake is fine unless you go to the next level.

Carb is up to you. Anything 650 or larger. Smaller throttle bores will help throttle response.

An interesting thread here to read. A lot of talking and the test starts at post 49

Iron head test starting on '78 440.

The single plane intake and larger cam don't necessarily jive with a c body and 3.23 gears but there is a lot of useful info here.
 
Lots of good replies
I owned 2 Imperials and TWO 73 New yorkers and a 78 Maxivan
I helped design the Micey Thompson quench dome pistons now maybe also ICON which were suggest as from Hughes

If you are NOT going to change the pistons use the Mike Jones Motorhome cam 256@.006 204 @.050 .305 lobe lift or a similar one from HOWARDS run Rhodes you liftersas
you need keep the dynamic compression as high as possible 10 more degrees will kill your grunt with your gears and a stock converter
If changing pistons use the quench domes and you must deck block for close piston to head clerance
now you do NOT have hard exhaust seats so if you are going to run it hard or tow or if your exhaust seats are worn you need seats use the premium DURABOND sintered iron seats
you will need guides do a modern 5-7 angle valve job on the intakes and a radius job on the exhaust backcut the intakes viton seals
you might investigate beehive valve springs and retainers
you can use K line conversion guide sleeves and go to 11/32 valves but this is not a race car
if you need new valves the traditional way is the MOPAR PERFORMANCE oversize valves then open the bowls to 90 % leave the seats wider that a racecar the valves loose heat thru the seats
It may be cost effective to go to aftermarket heads with non open chamber not Hughes and there are better combustion chambers than Edelbrock unless they changed the were old wedge style
Trick Flows may be best but touch up the valve job and you may want to consider beehive springs and retainers
I'd as Eric Weingartner to buy and build the heads if I wanted a top notch job )I can do it myuself) Let Eric pick the heads
stock pistons will still be way down the hole and you need to find some D Dish pistons to get compression and tight quench
still heads and cams can be a cost effective answer you just need to watch you timing and gas
If your compression is up then get your head flows and just bite the bullet and ask Mike Jones to do a cam for your combination
maybe a feww more bucks than a shelf cam but his consulting is worth it and you will end up with more torque
Tranny Transgo reprogramming kit and if you do a rebuild choose between a 518 and a lock up pump and converter all well known mods I did both
 
the problem I ran into was that most of the available pistons wound up with under 8-1 or over 10-1...for a mild factory air automatic barge I wanted to stay around 9-1...(cue the "my 11-1 motor runs great on regular" crowd)...I used the dished ICON's, but those only come with the .990 big block chevy wrist pins so I had to spring for new rods too...by the time I did that and had it balanced I have a feeling a stroker kit wouldn't have been that much more...rest of combo HP manifolds (for looks more than performance),TTI 2 1/2 exhaust, performer 440 and 750 Holley, Hughes 2024 cam kit (remember I wanted it to idle with the factory air)
 
Last edited:
Good evening everyone hope all is going well. I have a low compression 440 from my 1973 chrysler New Yorker

im looking to build horse power and torque into. Any blue print or formula I can follow. I already have a carb and intake for it and plan to acquire hp exhaust manifolds. I don't mind spending some money however I want to sort of maximize my dollar per horsepower and torque for lack of better words. Any ideas or suggestions.

Id defiantly be happy with a crazy amount of torque over anything else. My rear end is a 3.23 gear with a sure grip brand new ready to go and Im also curious about what torque converter I should go with.
more compression will definitely help. Also, hughes makes a whiplash cam specifically for low compression motors. A factory hi stall converter, along with free flow intake and exhaust, and recurved distributor will wake it up as well.
 
I ran across a "POWENATION" segment on YouTube where they took a stock, well-used 440 our of a motorhome (or similar) and ran it to get a baseline of what it would do before they built it. Amazingly, it made LOTS of torque below 3000rpm, as is. After 3000rpm, apparently, the low compression ratio hurt ultimate power.

The interesting thing Chrysler did with their "smog" engines was to not really touch the heads or cams. The cams in those motors were a little bit larger in duration, overlap, and lift than the prior 256/260 cams of old. The intakes for the TQ can have the mounting plate cut-out to allow a normal carb to be used on them. As the mounting stud patter is the same for spreadbore and post-1967 Carter and Holley 4bbl carbs. The main orientation was to make the engine a better air pump, with the slightly longer cam timing.

SO, just the compression ratio was the main change, plus some fuel and spark calibrations. IF Mahle has some "MM" ring pistons with a 10.0CR rating with the existing heads, that would be where I headed as the thin rings unlock power through decreased friction. More than might be suspected. Might even be lighter than OEM, too?

Otherwise, a "quench dome" piston, like Hughes used to sell, might be a more-normal option. The dome increases quench/turbulence/compression ratio to approximate a closed-chamber head on the engine, without using the older closed-chamber heads with flat-top pistons.

I COMPLETELY concur with the torque converter statements above. When the '68 Road Runner 383 came out, we knew it had a bit looser converter in it for better off-line performance. Years later, in a listing for Chrysler Re-Man torque converters, the 10.75" '68 RR converter listing was the same as for the Slant 6. Made perfect sense as if the converter is "tight" enough for a Slant 6, with more power in front of it, the stall speed will be higher as a result. Slick move! Chevy did something similar with the '77+ Z/28s, using a V-6 torque converter behind their normal 350 V-8 of the time. Of like many racers using "Vega" converters to get more stall speed with their 350s. And some Opel 8" converters before that. FWIW

Of course, dual exhausts. Many options there.

Summit used to sell a Lunati cam (in a Summit Racing box) that was a modernized version of the Chrysler HP B/RB cam for a very good price. Lunati does not seem to sell that cam anymore (after their absorption into the Edelbrock Group), though. Might still be in the Summit catalog, though.

IF the budget can support it, a set of more modern design aluminum cyl heads can certainly increase air flow into and out of the motor. TrickFlow or AirFlowReasarch, as some others are based on the Chry 906 castings, but built in aluminum.

To me, a "torque motor" that "rpms" to 5500rpm or higher can be the best engine for general street use. Getting that "balance" can be tricky, sometimes. Probably need to watch some of the Nick's Garage YouTube videos to see what is possible!

Enjoy!
CBODY67
agree on the quench dome pistons, ixnay on the stock cams they have long close ramps to act like an EGR and reduce smog last thing you need is late losing good discussions on the converters or you can go lock up converter and pump
 
more compression will definitely help. Also, hughes makes a whiplash cam specifically for low compression motors. A factory hi stall converter, along with free flow intake and exhaust, and recurved distributor will wake it up as well.
recurve dist will work noneed for morewith resonable compression BVVC on Whiplash style cams they try to make a hot rod sound at the expense of torque I make dynot tested suggestion later
 
Back a few decades ago, I built a '67 GTX 440. I put 6bbl pistons in the motor with 915 heads (not recommend now, it would need race gas)
I used the stock magnum cam retarded 5° a 4 angle valve job, aluminum 6bbl intake and new stock carbs. I used the Roadrunner 383 / 340 torque converter. in an A12 clone '69 Roadrunner with 3.23s, 11.50 30" tall slicks and it ran 13.05 at 104. it had way too much compression, but ran amazingly well, it was a torque monster. it was amazing how much power compression makes. The motor had the normal stuff, balanced, shot peened rods, medium tension rings, aligned honed and deck equalized block etc. it would annihilate the L-60s (yea, that long ago) for as long as you kept the throttle open.
I bet 452 heads on this combo would run amazingly well, throw a cam that's not so big that you would need more gear or converter you could have 500+ torque and a solid 450 horsepower street engine.
My $.02
Iused the 6 pack pistons and 915 heads but milled a D dish in the heads like the old TRW TURBO piston best combi with a stock looking head
NO WAY to make open chamber heads work without quench dome pistons
 
keep in mind I would like to be able to use pump gas and I just really wanna spend my money where its gonna count you know
If you want to use pump gas you need to loose the open chamber heads with dished pistons (with or without stroker) We had a production rebuilder line to redoo MOPAR
Transit bus 440's Puttin in quench and the right cam reduces EGT temp 800 degrees under a
continuous load like going uphill Open chamber reqheads require race gas or E85 and timing fudges in a vehicle with your converter and gears and weight
If you know how to tune that carb ok otherwise TQ is your best choice Alum manifold just saves weight no real HP gain with your rpm range
 
agree on the quench dome pistons, ixnay on the stock cams they have long close ramps to act like an EGR and reduce smog last thing you need is late losing good discussions on the converters or you can go lock up converter and pump
ANY cam with longer overlap will have a certain amount of internal EGR due to reversion in the chamber and intake manifold at lower rpms. That is usually where the "lumpy" sound comes from. BUT the longer overlap will help power over 3000rpms, as longer durations do to.

By 1972, the OEM cams had a bit more duration and more overlap, with the overlap being an emissions issue as the longer duration was to help better-fill the cylinders to help compensate for the lower CR. Ford also did this on their 1974 351HO motors.

Until more people got cyl head flow benches, all porting was done "by sight" and what was thought to look good. Just as the ports in the 906s were supposed to be better than the prior heads. Same on the Stage IV DC heads. When the main difference was the larger exh valve. As ALL B/RB heads, when ported with the MP Porting Templates, would all flow the same. THEN came the quench dome pistons and we learned that quench was better than not. By that time in the later 1980s, most of the older closed chamber heads had been scrapped as "bad", I suspect, when all they needed was the larger exh valve of the 1967 GTX 440. BTAIM

On our '72 Newport 400 2bbl, the exh temp was higher than our similar '66 Newport 383, open chamber vs closed chamber heads. The higher exh heat was used to allow the residue combustibles in the exh gases to more fully cook by the time they got to the end of the pipes. Without an external AIR pump, on non-cat converter vehicles.

I KNOW there has to be some engineering papers somewhere which indicates the emissions output of a stock 256/260 cam vs a similar aftermarket cam, as to which is cleaner, uses fuel better for better cruise economy, and ultimate power output. Everybody monitors air/fuel at WOT on the dyno runs, but none of the other stuff. Surely, with all of the cam lobes out there, there has to be a better combination we could buy and enjoy?

Such a test would be costly and time-consuming to do. Plus the additional instruments needed. I suspect the current "corporate" magazines would want to undertake such testing, either. Nor would the corporate cam vendors, I suspect.

I have seen some tests about lobe center separation specs affecting power below 3000rpm, but little else. For a stock, street engine, some minor changes can affect power more than not, it seems. A "torque" motor that is not shy about hitting 5000-5500rpm is the goal.

CBODY67
 
NO that combination will not work with your converter and gears andheavy car
Hughes stuff is way overpriced and do not even think about Whiplash or Rattler you look atg the specs of those cams and see that the rattler needs more compression and the whiplash will not idel and gas mileage will suck there is no free lunch
Without going into the short block the Jones cam or the similar howard is about all you can do
your carb and manifold will make no difference over stock but your choice the tq will give better gas mileage
if you decide to get into heads and block give me a pm
I've built hundreds of low compression 440s
second most economical thing ks going to quench dome pistons
changing to higher compression flat top pistons with open chamber heads without quench gets you into detonation easier ok if you have E85 or you convert to Propane but not on pump gas
 
An interesting thread here to read. A lot of talking and the test starts at post 49

Iron head test starting on '78 440.

The single plane intake and larger cam don't necessarily jive with a c body and 3.23 gears but there is a lot of useful info here.
Yes, the author of that thread (IQ52) has done a number of low-CR builds and done A->B parts swaps and dyno'd the results.
He's done excellent work, much to be admired that he's put it out there for us to see.

While he does dispel some wive's-tale myths, there are 2 caveats:
1. I believe he blueprints those low-CR shortblocks, so he's therefore getting the max they can deliver. Someone else's rebuild might not perform as well.
2. #2, and this is the big one - he's not showing any dyno data below 3000rpm, and that's where you'll spend 90% of your time. You must pass thru the lower rpm before you ever get to the high RPM. That can be a VERY disappointing area for a heavy car.
 
You have a lot of possibilities, but the best bang for the buck is higher compression pistons! Even a stock 440 HP cam and heads will make a lot more power than anything with the lower compression pistons! For a distributor, I'd highly recommend getting in contact with Halifaxhops who rebuilds distributors and is on all the mopar sites.
 
Back
Top