That's interesting question. This sorta touches on it:
Aircraft Nose Art Makes Quiet Comeback, Reviving Air Force Tradition
i am certain by today's standards, the society wouldnt stand for it.
Today, therefore, surely the miltitary has "rules" on this stuff, probably did then too. "Objectifying" women was "acceptable" back then, the military personnel flying/working on planes were men.
I am NOT arguing FOR one thing or another. Aint judging either, however, as a father with daughters and grand daughters, I am cool they toned that stuff down.
We were sending these young men into war, and from which many would NEVER come home. that doesnt make it "OK" to put a naked lady on your bomber, but maybe it helped morale.
What's more "obscene"? A provocative painting on your plane, or hosing your buddy's guts out of his turret gun?
It wasnt just the pinup issue. Add to that the copyrights/trademark "infringment" potential .. dunno if Disney, for example, had the outrage to sure the government DURING the war.
View attachment 668639View attachment 668640View attachment 668641
Gimme sharks, and dragons, and other fearsome images all day long. Seems that is, and always has been ok.
View attachment 668643