I found another reference to the dealership on FB with the same pic saying the building was torn down.
Are the FB folks specifically referring to the building, or to whatever building was at 37 Forest Ave -- because I don't think the building we are discussing is located there.I found another reference to the dealership on FB with the same pic saying the building was torn down.
The dealership building itself.Are the FB folks specifically referring to the building,
Looks like it was there in 1998, gone in 2002really unique structure, but I cant find it. be interesting to see, like you said, if it survived.
At one time, they are listed to have also sold Rolls-Royce and Fiat brands. This info was in obituaries of people who workied there.
Also, sugggests it might have been located on "US-1" in Falmouth, but NO exact address of where it was/is.
"Flew up/down that road for 4-5 miles. Looked at existing dealership on the road. No luck. It was worth stab and could have been WAY wrong too.
Last date the dealership is mentioned that I found is 1980.
Looks like it was there in 1998, gone in 2002
1998
View attachment 669776
2002
View attachment 669774
View attachment 669775
Alan
240 US-1, Falmouth, ME 04105what address is that chief? thnks.
yeah, doesnt look like it was ever at 37 Forest in Portland. though there is space where things were and now gone, the remaining structures are way too old.
this Chaplin building, even IF it fit physically (doubt it), woulda been a "white elephant" (no pun intended) architecturally from its inception.
Ok, so it sure looks like was on US-1 in Falmouth.240 US-1, Falmouth, ME 04105
Alan
240 us route 1. That was the address, and the same lot and buildings I found.Looks like it was there in 1998, gone in 2002
1998
View attachment 669776
2002
View attachment 669774
View attachment 669775
Alan
That was an address that I found also in my searches too. I had even grabbed a screen shot, but I wasn't sure that was a good address. There was nothing else that looked right to verify it.240 US-1, Falmouth, ME 04105
Alan
That was an address that I found also in my searches too. I had even grabbed a screen shot, but I wasn't sure that was a good address. There was nothing else that looked right to verify it.
After your post, I'm going to say it was correct.
You see these types of store buildings all over New England.
View attachment 669778
In the 1970 aerial you can see the definition on the slopped wall better, compared to the main building.
View attachment 669786
Alan
Early Google camera car.how did you say Google gave 30-40 year old historical looks? i am only familiar with the "See other dates" feaature, but they dont go back before the first Gooogle cars were making "street views:.
The Street View in Google Maps only goes back to about 2007 and that is if they went through that area in the past.how did you say Google gave 30-40 year old historical looks? i am only familiar with the "See other dates" feaature, but they dont go back before the first Gooogle cars were making "street views:.
e.g.,
View attachment 669788
e.
That is because the cylinders are not part of the block. One would probably drop the crankshaft with the rods like on the picture above, then install the pistons, and then install the cylinders. That's what the picture below suggests.1942. Rolls Royce factory workers lowering the crank into a Merlin airplane engine. I'm kind of intrigued by the connecting rods already assembled onto the crank.
View attachment 669610
That's what I figured. It makes some sense to assemble the rods like that, but it still struck me that if I were assembling that engine like that, it would take me a half dozen tries to get the rods into the correct holes.That is because the cylinders are not part of the block. One would probably drop the crankshaft with the rods like on the picture above, then install the pistons, and then install the cylinders. That's what the picture below suggests.
View attachment 669801