And Stubbs needs to lighten up. . .
Is that implied to me or Rip?
Thats just his M.O., he’s really a nice guy!Dave, how can you disagree? I was making a point about statistics.
Dave, how can you disagree? I was making a point about statistics.
I don't know what its like out there in Nesbit
I have only had my Scat Pack for a month and I have had about 5 close calls with speeding violations. I haven't been pulled over....yet. It is so easy thinking I'm going 55-60 mph and I'll look down and I'm going 80 plus mph. There are alot of 2 lane roads here in Maryland where there are cops with radar hiding in cubby holes, cemetery's (yes cemetery's), and other places and they will ticket you for 8 mpg over the limit. I was driving today behind an asshat driving 36 mph in a 45 mph zone. There was 2 State Trooper cars and they were standing in their cubby hole pointing their radar at me. They were staring me down as I coasted by. I don't know if they were admiring my car or thinking there is somebody we are going to be on the lookout for.
My cousin drives all over the country with his flooring business and gets tickets often. He bought one of these Escort 360 radar detector and hasn't had another ticket since. He said it works with laser radar guns too. I know we have some people that are truck drivers here or drive cross country a lot.
Your thoughts???
View attachment 287187
And you NEVER said you were on the expressway either. You just said that there's a lot of 2 lane roads which makes us think/imply your on a 2 lane road thinkin your doin 55-60 and look down and see 80! Get over it and pay attention to your speed!!!I NEVER EVER said or implied that I was driving 80 on a 2 lane!!!
And you NEVER said you were on the expressway either. You just said that there's a lot of 2 lane roads which makes us think/imply your on a 2 lane road thinkin your doin 55-60 and look down and see 80! Get over it and pay attention to your speed!!!
I defend speed , speed is my friend .
I don't read it like that...Look at it this way. If two cars collide with two occupants each and , let’s say car #1 has two females, one driver, one passenger. And car #2 has two males, one driver one passenger. If both occupants in each car dies the fatality stats would be what?
4 people total involved died.
25% were male DRIVERS.
25% were female DRIVERS
The remaining 50% are PASSENGERS.
The stats quoted were dealing with DRIVERS involved in fatal crashes taken from the total of fatalities of all involved in the crash.
Now, could they have just given us the driver stats, leaving the others out of the equation? I guess so, and I don’t know why they didn’t. Nothing wrong with the numbers though.
I’ll say good morning to you and stand
above the fray of condescending remarks!
Leave Stubbs alone... I've come to enjoy his, often unexpected, interjections...And Stubbs needs to lighten up. . .
Well, it could be aggressive driverless cars!I don't read it like that...
And good morning to you too.