Sober. Useful, Has purpose
Agreed. My focus is on some of the ridiculous cars of the era.Everyone has their own likes and dislikes.
Agreed. The last car (black) is a perfect example of industrial strenght "kitsch" (art, objects, or design considered to be in poor taste because of excessive garishness or sentimentality, but sometimes appreciated in an ironic or knowing way). Sadly this seems to be atypical of the period.Too much, in my opinion.
![]()
![]()
Sorry guys!
Some weren't necessarily too much but, just didn't look right.
![]()
Seriously, every maker jumped right on the "sedan coupe" design. Gorgeous when the CLS was intro'd but all the copycats have ground the concept into the dirt. KIA? The KIA and the Merc look the same now along with Hyundai, Fusion, et Al.and even the Mercedes CLS models from a few years ago (much more than the current one) strike a chord of greatness.
When talking about the high water mark of 50s fin designs you'll see in some instances that the base line models, at least in hindsight, looked way better than the ultimate tinsel Versions with two or three tone and multiple taillights, some base cars even looked good while the luxury models looked bad. In case of the 59 Mercury I agree that especially the Parklane top model is overloaded. On the other Hand I find the Commuter Station wagon among the most attractive wagons of this model year.
View attachment 43231
That car has no personality IMO. Bland, jelly bean styling like many cars today. They imitate each other with small variations. It is harder to design today then in the past before the whole OPEC thing.Seriously, every maker jumped right on the "sedan coupe" design. Gorgeous when the CLS was intro'd but all the copycats have ground the concept into the dirt. KIA? The KIA and the Merc look the same now along with Hyundai, Fusion, et Al.
![]()
Posted via Topify on Android
How useful is that extended portion of the roof on the black car? Is that to aid aerodynamics also?X 2.
Here's my base 59 for Gary to hate, lol!