I personally don't like labels applied to some policies that just make sense for everyone, and financially for everyone too when looking at the whole system big picture. I have found that Medicare and my Social Security check are welcome in the retirement portion of my life now, and am glad I have them (and I earned them).
No one likes the Socialist label because it connotes failure. That’s why it gets a new name every so often, like progressive or liberal. But will you accept a simple definition that says Socialism means that we all work together to take care of each other? You might not like the labels, but SSI and Medicare are outside the realm of pure capitalism… And that’s OK, few things are completely “pure” and I’m not an ideologue. We are well past 1935 or 1965 and it does not make someone a hypocrite to collect the money taken from them by force (of law) years earlier.
I don't see a real problem if we get closer to an education system that works for everyone, and a health insurance system that works for everyone - such systems, I believe, would benefit us all, and the nation as a whole too. And health wise, it wouldn't hurt if people actually took care of themselves rather just eat with total abandon and avoid all exercise, etc. and hope a doctor can "fix" them when it all goes wrong. I don't understand why some 30-40% of our population is obese?
The education system works well for those who have an interest in being educated. What do you consider an “education system that works for everyone”? More dollars thrown at it? More free stuff? I won’t attempt to get into the government’s role in leading a healthy lifestyle beyond saying that if living a longer life, free of health problems isn’t motivation enough, I don’t know what Uncle Sam can do short of the forced-feeding of Broccoli in nutrition re-education camps.
I didn't say anything about welfare, but it creeped into this as well. Yeah it is a problem, but what do you do with the people at the bottom who can't make a living on $10 an hour (maybe) and only part time jobs like Walmart has. Walmart knows damn well that we subsidize their wages with a welfare system that takes up where they left off. Their profits are mind boggling. But of course, that is just "capitalism" at work. BS. Why don't you get mad about them using our welfare system to create their incredible profits instead of them paying a living wage in the first place - instead of just complaining about the people that shop there using your money? Walmart does the same thing and is one of the fundamental causes of massive welfare spending. But you never complain about that.
You know what people used to do when they worked for a company that offered low pay and few benefits? They got better jobs, or they unionized. The fact that they
can receive welfare while working says more about the modern low bar for welfare qualification than what Wal-Mart pays their workers. (BTW I still use the hyphen because Walmart doesn’t want you to do so.) Wal-Mart pays what Wal-Mart needs to pay to attract workers. Entry level Wal-Mart (or fast food, etc.) jobs should never be our standard for jobs that can support a family, purchase a home, a new car, etc. It never was in the past in in those “glory days” of the 1950s. They are intended as “first jobs” for HS kids, part-time income, or keeping older people out of trouble.
Until we correct the huge imbalance in income inequality in this country, nothing will work well.
Which language is that quote translated from? Russian? Chinese? Venezuelan? What’s odd to me is the emphasis on material wealth placed by people who resent the rich. I wouldn’t argue with you that CEOs earn to much or that Wal-Marts profits are obscene. But apparently they either aren’t obscene-enough to truly piss-off the masses because they’re still buying as much as they can. I’ve done my shopping at Meijers and Krogers for decades now and haven’t been inside a Wal-Mart since they had hyphens. So in other words, I do my part. If no one else cares enough, they aren’t hurting enough.
But most on this site would rather blame the poor for whatever reason and not look deeper into the real causes of our problems. It seems everyone these days has an easy solution for everything, but usually no issue has one. As Trump is finding out bigly.
Do the “poohr” own any of their own fate? Do the decisions people make have any impact on their own lives? Most people I know have a new, flatscreen television connected to cable. They own newer cars than I do. They spend more on booze, tattoos, holiday decorations, vacations, clothing, football tickets, concert tickets, etc. Basically if it was something that depreciated the moment you took it home, they spent more. I do without a lot of this glitter to spend money on things that appreciate in value, like real estate. I bought my washer/dryer, bedroom set, and pretty much all of my cars from Craigslist. I only bought a new Challenger because they offered 0%, and then I sold it before it depreciated too much. I shop at estate sales. I get Docker’s work pants at a thrift store (sometimes with the original tags) for $4-5 a pair. I built a big addition on my house and gave up every weekend to pull wires, hang ducts, cut tile, run plumbing. I only farmed out the shell because that’s too much for one man (and the drywall because I hate hanging drywall). I own three houses and a commercial building and because I have the nerve to collect rent, people say I’m “rich”. I suppose it never occurs to them the fun I miss installing a water heater in a basement on a nice day, or fixing the furnace in a flat roof in a foot of snow. Or that I’ve been at work for 3 hours when they’re sitting up in bed each morning.
For this amount of privilege, I’m supposed to buy them college… when I paid for my own by working in a stamping plant. Buy them healthcare when
I never even consideredquitting my job regardless of idiot boss or 100+ degree temps in a shop because my job had healthcare benefits. When I’m pecking away on a BlackBerry, I should buy them a new iPhone.
But at the end of the day, I control my own fate. Don’t tell me “it was easier in my grandparents day”. He lived through a depression and tour in Africa against Rommel. But before that he worked in a war plant and was investigated as a spy because he was Italian. He didn’t have a color TV until the late 60s, and had a dial phone until he died, but he left $300k behind… And it hasn’t been touched by the family. My father was drafted, but luckily missed Vietnam. He had to work in a meat packing plant while he was laid off. Nobody is bitter. Nobody is unhappy. Nobody sits around talking about “income inequality” but I bet a lot of people would like to help themselves to their wealth. And then they’ll encounter another piece of the constitution.
I also find it insulting to suggest that if I don't like things just the way they are when they could be improved, I can just "move" if I don't like it. That is retarded, offensive, and nonsense.
I don’t like to see a legitimate question labeled as “retarded, offensive nonsense”. There are places that offer a free-utopia; healthcare, daycare, college, assisted living and probably burial as well. Cradle-to-grave. Places like Spain have fantastic weather, beautiful scenery and interesting history. If that’s too much sun, my experience in Germany says it looks like Tennessee without a speed limit. Most places in Europe won’t tax you to death for an American car provided it’s 30+ years old. There is Australia with its own batch of cool old cars, sunshine, steakhouses, shrimp-on-barbie and all the guns were picked up years ago. Certainly Canada isn’t a culture shock for an American if you think Tim Horton’s makes good doughnuts and you can learn the language. Asia is cramped, but you’ll score all the hot chicks because you’re taller. Why spend precious years of your life banging your head against people who refuse to vote for income equality, free stuff and further refuse to disarm? If I could find a place where the government wasn’t up my rear end trying to “improve” my life, I’d at least consider it and would consider the suggestion as helpful. Deprive America of your intellectual capital and improve the life of people who are more aligned with your thinking; isn’t that the ultimate “revenge” if you will?