If the rods are of lighter weight, that would also play into the 512 pistons/pins possibly being heaver than the similar 496 pistons/pins? Less rotating weight can also mean faster "zings". The stock Chrysler pistons and pins are a good bit heavier than other similar engines' similar items, as I recall. Which is where the Ross lightweight pistons/pins used to come into play. with non-stroker race engines.
Curious, just how much additional torque and horsepower would the 512 build at the flywheel in order to justify cutting the crank? Everything else being equal.
Just some thoughts,
CBODY67