Samplingman
Old Man with a Hat
what's a u code?
440-4 HP 350 horesepower
what's a u code?
440-4 HP 350 horesepower
What's a U Code?
440-4 HP 350 horesepower
sorry that is not correct.
A U-code means it is the High performance version. In 1970 the HP rating was 375 for the U-code (E86).
In 1971 the U-code (E86) had 370 HP. In 1972 it dropped to 280 net horsepower
Carsten
BUT did they come in an Imperial?
no u-code/E86 engines on 69&up Imperials AFAIK
Dual exhaust has nothing to do with it. Check out 1970 SFGTs which had only basic T-Code (E85) engines but dual exhaust
Carsten
Glad to see this thread is staying on topic... LOL!!
Interesting stuff here!
sorry that is not correct.
A U-code means it is the High performance version. In 1970 the HP rating was 375 for the U-code (E86).
In 1971 the U-code (E86) had 370 HP. In 1972 it dropped to 280 net horsepower
Carsten
Thanks. The "data" seems to confirm that. Excerpt from "1969 Imperial Data Book" (courtesy of the Imperial Club site) below. No TNT's in Imperials offered but still optional in some of the other C's '69-'72 (didnt look at '73 but would not expect that year to be any different than previous four years).
Still curious to me as to why, but simplest answer is probably Chrysler wanted the Imperial to be "different". E85 "T" codes were plenty potent enough to carry the mail in any C-body, so E86's may not have been in the brand image of "Imperial" versus the "300"?
I'm done with this one...until a verified real live "U' code fuselage-years Imperial turns up somewhere.
View attachment 31308
i'm sorry sir. i started this detour inadvertently trying to honor the theme of the thread with the "one that got away" from me. i'm pretty sure what I saw, but the until this mythical U-code fuselage Imperial beastie sits down for the camera, she's on the same footing as "I saw Bigfoot once.":icon_redface:
it was interesting tho..hottest 440 (six pack excluded of course) engine not offered in the "flagship" model. 1970 Caddy is over there with 500 cubes, Lincolns with 460's .. guess Chrysler had their reasons.
I think this one might be beat down...maybe we will see some more "loves lost" as the thread continues. thanks
Hello... :sSig_greetingsthor: