Took a cool pic?

caterpillar.jpg

Not mine.
 
I think I got it...maybe. First clear morning in a week, I could be "tricked" by stars/atmospherics, etc.

Gotta go back out and "repeat the shots, about 10 minutes earlier.. its too close to sunrise (orange tints messin' up what I believe to be Mars), there are low clouds on horizon, light pollution from the "burbs" to the south, etc.,

Anyway, I took these this morning, January 30, 2016, 7 am, roughly SE to SW arc coverage, widest angle (not panoramic though) on digital camera, "NIGHT" shutter setting.

In order, first pic is full frame shot with planets marked, second is zoom-in, cropped shot of first pic (I know, still can't see much), and then highly magnified shots of second pic and what I think is big old "yellow" Jupiter in the SSW sky, and tiny Mercury low and near the sunrise in SSE sky.

View attachment 70494 View attachment 70495 View attachment 70496 View attachment 70497

We have yet to have a clear sky to get a picture.
 
Today was last, best day to catch this event. The arc span today was too wide for my meager Canon to catch them all, clouds rolled in as I was trying to get to the highest elevation within 20 miles of home (1,350 ft) making Venus and Mercury impossible to see, and it was 6:30 am February 5, 2016, 19 degrees F.

So, I got Mars, Saturn, and Jupiter --- and colors -- in closeup. To me, no doubt "these are them" to max magnification of my camera.

1. Mars is reddish (50 million miles away), with some striations in colors (dunno why its flattish - could be camera operator error)

2. Saturn looks white-ish (750 million miles away), and appears to be bisected by its rings on a tilt down toward the right, southern hemisphere illuminated the brightest and

3. Jupiter (350 million miles away) is swirly with colors, maybe a moon transiting it (upper middle dark spot) and maybe the "Great Red Spot" is visible (lower right, about to move to dark side).
A decade from now, I hope to be around to try this again. :)

Mars-1.jpg
Saturn-1.jpg
Jupiter-1.jpg
 
During the 2008 world series the camera guy zoomed in on an unusually close Jupiter. Absolutely stunning and amazing how much those cameras magnify.
 
During the 2008 world series the camera guy zoomed in on an unusually close Jupiter. Absolutely stunning and amazing how much those cameras magnify.

yup..they DO get great detail ..right up there with some of best optical telescopes ...300x to 400x if i had to guess.

all I have is 8x - good enough for most terrestrial stuff but not the celestials obviously.

compare all that to Hubble Telescope shot of Jupiter...see what 5,000x and no atmospheric distortion gets ya :)

Jupiter_Hubble_OPAL_480px.jpg
 
I don't know if you posted this.... what camera are you using?

I use a Canon EOS 60 ..I can't be specific on the lenses ,certainly not top of the line but not bad. Do you use a tripod for these shots?
 
I don't know if you posted this.... what camera are you using?

I use a Canon EOS 60 ..I can't be specific on the lenses ,certainly not top of the line but not bad. Do you use a tripod for these shots?
Great shots Ray! I would imagine you'd have to use a tripod. Last eclipse I couldn't get a clear shot until I used the Webber to rest the camera on and then I was golden.
 
That's why I asked Matt.... especially on Night shots and maxed out on your magnification you would almost have to be
Amazinblue takes some nice shots
 
I don't know if you posted this.... what camera are you using?

I use a Canon EOS 60 ..I can't be specific on the lenses ,certainly not top of the line but not bad. Do you use a tripod for these shots?

I have a strictly "amateur" point/click skill set ..no tripod but try to have steady hand and camera software/features to compensate for any "shakiness" and focus issues.

Anyway, I have a Canon A810, about five years old now I guess. 16 MP, no special lens attachments, has HD video, etc. For my skill level and requirements, its very adequate .. and its probably capable of much better shots but I just don't know enough to utilize its full potential.
 
I have a strictly "amateur" point/click skill set ..no tripod but try to have steady hand and camera software/features to compensate for any "shakiness" and focus issues.

Anyway, I have a Canon A810, about five years old now I guess. 16 MP, no special lens attachments, has HD video, etc. For my skill level and requirements, its very adequate .. and its probably capable of much better shots but I just don't know enough to utilize its full potential.
You took those without the camera resting on something?? Hands of a surgeon!
 
I have a strictly "amateur" point/click skill set ..no tripod but try to have steady hand and camera software/features to compensate for any "shakiness" and focus issues.

Anyway, I have a Canon A810, about five years old now I guess. 16 MP, no special lens attachments, has HD video, etc. For my skill level and requirements, its very adequate .. and its probably capable of much better shots but I just don't know enough to utilize its full potential.
I had a feeling you were shooting from the hip. I basically do too and just don't have the time to enhance my skill set
 
That's why I asked Matt.... especially on Night shots and maxed out on your magnification you would almost have to be
Amazinblue takes some nice shots

more credit than I deserve fellas...but thanks. many others who have posted here have both good "eyes" and "good" gear versus me. :)
 
Last edited:
The shadow of the plane I am on, on the top of the clouds.

View attachment 71647

thats a cool shot...good eye and/or good luck to catch that at right time :)

was the "halo" around the plane and caught on the cloud with the shadow OR is that some sort of property on/in the inner plastic/outer glass of the window creating that effect?

if the former, i gotta research the refractory science behind that to learn how it happens in this context. its the nerd in me..can't help it :)

could be this? a "glory" .. if so, its definitely outside the plane.

Glory (optical phenomenon) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A glory is an optical phenomenon that resembles an iconic saint's halo about the shadow of the observer's head, caused by light of the Sun or (more rarely) the Moon interacting with the tiny water droplets that make up mist or clouds. The glory consists of one or more concentric, successively dimmer rings, each of which is red on the outside and bluish towards the centre. The effect is believed to happen due to classical wave tunneling, when light nearby a droplet tunnels through air inside the droplet and, in the case of a glory, is emitted backwards due to resonance effect​
 
Last edited:
Back
Top