Are there not also two relief breaks in the course of a shift. IIRC, Chrysler opted to shut the line down for these breaks instead of doing tag relief and keeping the line going?
There you have it:
CS43T8C149423 (MDH 020812)
CS43N8C149425 (MDH 020709)
Two VIN ticks apart, but the higher VIN was completed the day before.
It is still a close couple. Thanks!
Any idea why this happens?
Don't these cars start production on the assembly line in VIN sequence?
There you have it:
CS43T8C149423 (MDH 020812)
CS43N8C149425 (MDH 020709)
Two VIN ticks apart, but the higher VIN was completed the day before.
It is still a close couple. Thanks!
Any idea why this happens?
Don't these cars start production on the assembly line in VIN sequence?
And it happens all the time. Here are two more examples for 1978:
CS23T8C118672 SPD A10, MDH 100715)
CS43T8C118697 SPD A11, MDH 100307)
CS43T8C181574 SPD 619, MDH 062011)
CS43T8C181591 SPD 619, MDH 052212)
181591 was completed almost a month before its scheduled production day.
.Posts #207 and #208 on page 11 of this thread give some good reasons for the constant reshuffling of the cars to be built.
Oh yeah.” Aiy-E-Aaah!”. I remember now: “Blood and...STEEL!”...I hope you have a lot of good memories...
Oh yeah.” Aiy-E-Aaah!”. I remember now: “Blood and...STEEL!”...I hope you have a lot of good memories...
BTW, we tested the XM1 Abrams Tank in the desert at Donna Ana Base Camp in New Mexico for 2 years.
We had M60 Tanks, M551 Sheridan's, M114 Scouts with 20MM chain guns. We could knock aircraft out of the sky with them!
View attachment 307992 View attachment 307993
XM1 was a Chrysler product as I recall, or at least parts of it were. It had a combination of internationally supplied systems.
I would not want to be on the receiving end of a 20mm. No sir.