Stock pan, with a gromet style seal, works every time. See post #12 in the below link.
727 dipstick tube leak
727 dipstick tube leak
YUP, Thatz the one I'm talkin' about. Some where between red and ? ... BTW HWYCRZR, Iz the Dirt Track in Fargo still in business? Had a very enjoyable evening in the standz there in ? '77 I think. Found out about the track when I was down for the weekend in Moorhead with an Over Dimensional load and couldn't deliver in Winnipeg 'til Monday. Jer
So far so good. I don’t like adding goo to gaskets either. I was diligent in using paint prep to clean off any oil on the surfaces. Ask me in a couple of years. Did the valve covers as well.I’ve never had one of those orange silicone gaskets seal anything. I don’t use sealer.
I can get other gaskets to seal just fine.
I went nutz with an aluminum transmission pan but it didn't leak lol. I think I bought it from Summit, can't remember. T....
your computer and research them. It's about 1/8" thick and solid silicone. company has made the owners comfortably wealthy supplying the airplane industry with their gaskets. That iz high praise and well deserved. If you go that route follow their recommendations on mounting it "dry" and for torquing to 16 inch pounds. On yeah, They make basically the same gasket for the RB rocker covers too, Jer
Here are photos of the leak points. This is in a van so easy to photo this. I Cleaned it up real good so I can see where the leak is. You can’t tell what is leaking when it’s all greasy and dirty. I used Castrol super clean at the car wash. This one has a bad shift seal.
First photo shows the shift linkage, there is a seal in the case. Then you can see the 2nd gear band adjuster nut and shaft and the front cooling line.
Just because your neutral safety switch is old does not mean it is leaking. They have a nice seal ring that seldom fails. Just keep the dirt out when replacing it.
The red arrow is pointing to the low band shaft, it has an o ring on it. If it leaks clean it good and cover the end with “the right stuff”
3 pan gaskets, I like the cork rubber combo the best. The brown one is fine also . The black rubber one is a mot very good IMO. I don’t use them, seems too hard to compress and seal anything. This applies to valve cover gaskets also.
View attachment 398777
View attachment 398778
View attachment 398779
View attachment 398780
So far so good. I don’t like adding goo to gaskets either. I was diligent in using paint prep to clean off any oil on the surfaces. Ask me in a couple of years. Did the valve covers as well.
I tried one of those silicone gaskets on my 904 in my '65 Barracuda. I changed the upper valve body to a later, part throttle downshift version.
I wish I could say that it worked, but it's been a dismal failure. I can't get it to stop leaking. Tried different torque etc. Yea, 25 in/lbs... Cleaned everything real well... Just like the directions say. Had it off and back on. The fluid leaks fast enough to watch it drip.
The gasket that was on it was just lightly glued to the pan with no leaks. The pan is in good shape, no bends or problems.
I used the reusable Mopar gasket that people here and a couple friends recommend for a 727 on my 300. No leaks at all... and I have had that one off once and reused it. I found that Lube Locker made a very similar one for the 904 and that should be here sometime today.
For my money, the 727 gets the Mopar gasket, hands down. I have a buddy that builds 727 transmissions that swears by them. Part #2464324AC.
The silicone gasket may work great with other transmissions, but it's not working with my 904.
@Gerald Morris , you are quite the constructor of sentences. Me like!I went for the Moroso gasket this time after having tried the Mopar MOPAR 02464324AC gasket back on 10-28-2016. (Computers are HANDY for keeping receipts!) That one is a good gasket, but didn't quite stop the fluid loss. The Lube Locker made it to my Top 5 Contender List this time around also. I ruled it out because its a little thin. All three gaskets I've named have some reinforcing middle stratum to help hold them true to the shape and surfaces of the transmission and pan. One criticism of the pure silicone gaskets I've seen is that they lack this, and are apt to get sucked into the transmission at times due to this lack.
I'd best start my Novena to St. Joe the Mechanic that this doesn't devolve into some latter day saga....
I did install the Lube Locker yesterday and it's thinner than I expected. Quite frankly, I thought it would be an aftermarket version of the Mopar piece, but it falls short of that. Being a 904, my choices are limited. Moroso doesn't make a gasket for the 904, so that's not a consideration for me.I went for the Moroso gasket this time after having tried the Mopar MOPAR 02464324AC gasket back on 10-28-2016. (Computers are HANDY for keeping receipts!) That one is a good gasket, but didn't quite stop the fluid loss. The Lube Locker made it to my Top 5 Contender List this time around also. I ruled it out because its a little thin. All three gaskets I've named have some reinforcing middle stratum to help hold them true to the shape and surfaces of the transmission and pan. One criticism of the pure silicone gaskets I've seen is that they lack this, and are apt to get sucked into the transmission at times due to this lack.
I'd best start my Novena to St. Joe the Mechanic that this doesn't devolve into some latter day saga....
Thatz why the Lord gave us choices of Blondes, Brunettes, and Red Heads. I'll leave you with one more about silicone my new friend. There are times and instances when Gorilla Snot in a tube iz the only choice and rightfully so, ie: cornerz of valley pan gaskets, timing chain coverz in in cornerz of 318s between the block and pan behind those coverz and a few other places that escape me memory rite now. Mother Mopar Part Counters sells a 3 oz tube of that Gorilla Snot that they tag ATF-RTV Part # 05010884AA, and I know for sure because I have friendz behind a few of those parts counters that tell me that factory wrenches from the Bow Tie and Blue Oval camps show up from time to time to keep a tube of that Mopar Gorilla Snot in their tool chests at work when they need the good stuff. BTW, This stuff iz the "let it stand for 24 hourz stuff", JerI know of the gasket company you extol and I DID consider them! I opted for the Moroso gasket because they combine silicone with steel at 3/16" thickness. I WILL take the UTMOST CARE TORQUING my pan bolts too! This matter cannot be over-emphasized with neophyte tranny-pan fixers, ESPECIALLY WITH SILICONE GASKETS.
In any case, the Moroso gasket awaits my attentions HERE, NOW, so IFF the current monsoon cool speel will persist until this weekend, I may avail myself of it and some fresh Type F fluid and filter then too.
I LOVE the idea of a gasket which can endure more than one application. I also HATE having my machine down for 24 hours to let RTV set, but know that if necessary, I will give it that full 24. Pray with me that the Old Pueblo gets some NORMAL September weather this year, so I can test the Moroso gasket and some of the hypotheses buzzing in my bonnet....
Thatz why the Lord gave us choices of Blondes, Brunettes, and Red Heads. I'll leave you with one more about silicone my new friend. There are times and instances when Gorilla Snot in a tube iz the only choice and rightfully.....
BTW, This stuff iz the "let it stand for 24 hourz stuff", Jer
I did install the Lube Locker yesterday and it's thinner than I expected. Quite frankly, I thought it would be an aftermarket version of the Mopar piece, but it falls short of that. Being a 904, my choices are limited. Moroso doesn't make a gasket for the 904, so that's not a consideration for me.
The core is aluminum rather than steel, that may or may not be better. The beading doesn't stand very proud of the surface, but it looks good.
Bottom line is that after a night with a fresh piece of cardboard under it to show drips, it seems to have done the job. I also liked that the gasket isn't as fussy about torque specs. I think that the low torque in the Tennessee gasket procedure just isn't enough to pull the pan down tight enough to seal the gasket. Too much and the gasket distorts, so hitting the "sweet spot" where it seals, yet doesn't squeeze out, may be hard to do. I lost over a quart of fluid into the drip pan while I waited 5 days for the new gasket to show up.
I tried one of those silicone gaskets on my 904 in my '65 Barracuda. I changed the upper valve body to a later, part throttle downshift version.
I wish I could say that it worked, but it's been a dismal failure. I can't get it to stop leaking. Tried different torque etc. Yea, 25 in/lbs... Cleaned everything real well... Just like the directions say. Had it off and back on. The fluid leaks fast enough to watch it drip.
The gasket that was on it was just lightly glued to the pan with no leaks. The pan is in good shape, no bends or problems.
I used the reusable Mopar gasket that people here and a couple friends recommend for a 727 on my 300. No leaks at all... and I have had that one off once and reused it. I found that Lube Locker made a very similar one for the 904 and that should be here sometime today.
For my money, the 727 gets the Mopar gasket, hands down. I have a buddy that builds 727 transmissions that swears by them. Part #2464324AC.
The silicone gasket may work great with other transmissions, but it's not working with my 904.
I'm going to walk this back a bit.
The new gasket was dry for a couple days and then I had all sorts of fluid that had dripped out.
I happened to see something laying on the floor and realized what had happened. It was the throttle shaft seal.
The '65 904 trans in my car is cable shifted. The throttle linkage comes into the top of the trans and uses the same seal as the later one does to seal it to the valve body, except in this case, it seals it to the case. When I put the valve body back in, I knocked the seal out.
Big duh moment for me. It was OK until the fluid drained back into the pan from the converter etc., but when it did, and the fluid got as high as the seal, it poured out.
Put the seal back in place, which was pretty simple, and no more leak.
So... I may have been too hasty to blame the silicone gasket. That said, I do like the Lube Locker gasket a little better as it's not as fussy about fastener torque.
I've had a couple B&M shifters in cars and I'm not real sure if the amount of travel at the shifter is the same as what is needed at the valve body. The cable floor shifter in my Barracuda works similar to the B&M shifter, so I would look for one of those if it were me. The console is small enough to fit just about anything.What LAUDABLE HUMILITY you've demonstrated here Big John !!! You rate a Golden Pentastar for the Day for this one Sir.
Do you think the cable linked 1965 (and earlier, but especially the 1965 ones) can readily be adapted to use a B & M floor shifter or such? It occurs to me that such a scheme for the right C body may work toward creating a pickup truck based on the car body similar to the Ranchero or even the ultra RARE Imperial "flower-getter" once posted to this very Forum. NOT a show room project mind you, but as a practical work vehicle, such appeals to me.