traintech55
Senior Member
See what you started John.I've just decided to sell my NYB. I want $20,000.00 and I am firm. If it doesn't sell, I'll keep it. If you don't think I'm serious, give me $20k right now and you'll own it.
See what you started John.I've just decided to sell my NYB. I want $20,000.00 and I am firm. If it doesn't sell, I'll keep it. If you don't think I'm serious, give me $20k right now and you'll own it.
See what you started John.
Give me a minute and I can get you the production numbers on your car. A have to ask a friend to look it up.....
I have some one with deep pockets that has asked me about the car.
Could you kindly post up some pictures as requested?
While i understand people's emotional attachment to automobiles we need to set that aside for the moment and work on the details of the car. Put your cards on the table.
The white books are pretty accurate. While i am no fan of GG, I know he spent an overabundance of time working with Chrysler historical gathering all that information. Did any of you do that?
Oh and by the way ummmm there is a cop car in the latest MCG...and you all claim mcg hates Sea Bodies....OK, carry on.
Oh and by the way ummmm there is a cop car in the latest MCG...and you all claim mcg hates Sea Bodies....OK, carry on.
That's a long minute Trev
What does "It's not so simple and i will leave it at that" mean"? This is a hobby, not the CIA.I will respectfully disagree with the term "catch" up because I have known Rob since the magazine first started. We have had too many discussions over the years about the sea body thing. It's not so simple and i will leave it at that. I can't even get him to run my pictures of Elwood's personal Bluesmobile.
Well lets see what he does. I canceled my subscription years ago because they always had the same cars. At least Mopar Action does a few "C" bodies a year.Rob et.al. have been playing "catch-up" for awhile now, regarding the popularity of C-bodies. MCG, has always poo-pooed C-bodies, as "barges" and "donor cars" for A,B & E bodies. Now that readers taste have changed, and Rob's not getting any younger, his tastes have changed as well.
In fact, Mr. Wolf (MCG) was visiting a friends MoPar shop last month where I have a few C-bodies. He took photos of some of my C's and we talked about featuring some full size MoPars in the future. The market has evolved, so must MCG, which is a good thing for everyone, even if they are late to the party.
I suggested the seller of this rare and desirable 426, 4-spd C-body reach out to Mr. Wolf for a spot in the "Rare Finds"/Construction section. Rob may feature it. If you want his # send me a PM.
Rob likes the high profile cars, a Hurst 300 prototype, the 71 Polara "HP2" car, things like that.aube if I stick a monster engine in my car, with a big scoop on the hood, in a sinister paint scheme (I will not customize the interior, so that won't help me) and big fat tires out back, with a cute license plate on the bumper, he might cast it a second glance. But if I tell him the zany story behind the extraction from a junkie's possession while a seal juggles in the background and something involving out running three counties worth of sheriff deputies, he might listen for 30 seconds longer.
They have close to the same number of L700's shown throughout the years as they have shown C bodies. I have the next 6 days to go through back issues if anyone needs a count.
Rob might be a great person, Im neutral on his business personality. I always buy from the gals.
What report is this from?1965 DODGE MONACO:
426 CID "wedge", w/manual 4-speed transmission: 150 units produced.
Would you be able to post more production numbers for 4 Speed C-Bodies? Or even a year breakdown of most to least common?An automotive historian with records, information and contacts. His name isn't Galen.
An automotive historian with records, information and contacts. His name isn't Galen.
FWI:there are other 65 426 4-speed Monacos out there.
Would you be able to post more production numbers for 4 Speed C-Bodies? Or even a year breakdown of most to least common?