For Sale 71 Polara On FB
- Thread starter azblackhemi
- Start date
- Status
polara71
Old Man with a Hat
A steering wheel ....
MarPar
Meat Man with a Hat
A ham sammich
Back to Wyatt's car. The answer to my hubcap question is in his original thread here:
1971 Polara 2 door Hardtop.
AFAICT, the turquoise car's original wheel covers are the same as on my '70 'vert ("deluxe"), but the ones Wyatt has put on ("deep dish") look nicer--no surprise there, as the latter were an extra cost item back at the time.
Last edited:
71Polara383
Kid with ballcap
Yeah. Going to keep it listed. The Squad car is sold awaiting transport. I doubt this will leave my stable, but it could.
Wyatt's 71 Monaco adds variety to the collection and came with a big block from the factory and is another shade of blue that is attractive. I prefer them only slightly to Polaras because to my eyes the die cast grille is more classy than the Polara plastic one and I prefer the squared off headlight surrounds as opposed to the round ones on the Polaras.
And the tail lights on the Monaco are kind of unique and good looking and link to the rectangular style of its die cast grille well, whereas the rear of a 71 Polara looks too much like a copy of the 1966 Pontiac GTO, even though it is still also very attractive.
But I really do love both the Polaras and the Monacos. Lets face it, they are almost identical cars.
I also like the Sport Fury GTs because of their classy die cast front ends and hidden headlights and the overall styling just about as much but the very stylish quarters on the Dodges gave it the edge overall to my preferences.
What I could never understand is how the SFGT ended up with hidden headlights and none of the more upscale Dodge models didn't get them? Seems like the bean counters in those years got things mixed up.
I am sure opinions vary, and that is fine with me.
And the tail lights on the Monaco are kind of unique and good looking and link to the rectangular style of its die cast grille well, whereas the rear of a 71 Polara looks too much like a copy of the 1966 Pontiac GTO, even though it is still also very attractive.
But I really do love both the Polaras and the Monacos. Lets face it, they are almost identical cars.
I also like the Sport Fury GTs because of their classy die cast front ends and hidden headlights and the overall styling just about as much but the very stylish quarters on the Dodges gave it the edge overall to my preferences.
What I could never understand is how the SFGT ended up with hidden headlights and none of the more upscale Dodge models didn't get them? Seems like the bean counters in those years got things mixed up.
I am sure opinions vary, and that is fine with me.
Last edited:
Steve, you have in previous posts discussed differences between Imperials and lesser C-bodies, as well as about the NIV/suspension improvements introduced for the later in 1971. Would you care to chime in on differences (handling/comfort/insulation) between the senior Dodges and Plymouths? I am thinking especially about the '71's.
I also wonder about what happens to the subframe-suspension mounts over time?
Yes, ayilar, I really felt that the corporation made an across the board upgrade in the torsion quiet ride details (including more insulation) of all the 71 Plymouth and Dodge models, and Chrysler as well. In 1971 Plymouth also inherited torsion quiet ride and also had nice supportive bucket seats so that I really found no difference between the Plymouth and Dodge models in that respect. And all the interiors were much superior to previous models in comfort and appearance.
I have not had any issues with the subframe bushings over time that was significant as long as the attachment points were solid and free of rust.
I have not had any issues with the subframe bushings over time that was significant as long as the attachment points were solid and free of rust.
Thank you!
One more question: the Plymouth have a 2" shorter wheelbase than their Dodge counterparts. Visually, the rear track also seems narrower on the Furys, and from the sales brochures it looks like indeed the Polara/Monaco's was 1.4" wider.
--> Based on your experience, how would you compare the resulting ride and roadholding?
One more question: the Plymouth have a 2" shorter wheelbase than their Dodge counterparts. Visually, the rear track also seems narrower on the Furys, and from the sales brochures it looks like indeed the Polara/Monaco's was 1.4" wider.
--> Based on your experience, how would you compare the resulting ride and roadholding?
The Furys tended to feel a little more nimble because they were also lighter usually in addition to the shorter wheelbase. But not much difference to me between Dodges and Plymouths generally.
polara71
Old Man with a Hat
ImpJay
The different young
I mean that if the Imperials had something over the cheaper makes when it`s about the comfort of seats. Sorry for being hardly understandable.
Like did they give a softer feeling with less support, as an example.
71Polara383
Kid with ballcap
$4500
71Polara383
Kid with ballcap
Interior. Pretend you can't see the speedo. The original goes back in before it sells.
71Polara383
Kid with ballcap
Engine bay. I have cam/lifters/chain/302 heads that are included.
71Polara383
Kid with ballcap
Numbers.
71Polara383
Kid with ballcap
Underside
I have both and I have found that all Imperial Le Baron seats are supremely comfortable. I especially like the cloth and leather combination in the 1971 Le Barons, almost as good as the leather buckets. The cloth is amazing too in its feel and luxuriousness. The cloth feels like silk but holds up well.
- Status
Similar threads
