Heavy Metal

Stumbled on a 1963 "home movie" (three minutes, unnarrated) of the Edmund Fitzgerald getting unloaded in the Port of Toledo. Fascinating in its own right, but then I learned something else.

1673719834380.png
1673719852891.png
1673719865887.png


Home movie of Edmund Fitzgerald.



Its iron ore (taconite) is being unloaded by these gigantic (look at walkway railings to get a sense of scale vs. people) crane "shovels" digging into the hold of the Fitzgerald.

I learned those things had a name: "Huletts." Invented late 19th centery, first ones were steam powered then converted to electricity. 600 tons per hour, 10 tons per grab of its buckets, and were on rails. Then, unloading straight into railcars.

Common usage all along the larger, southern edge, Great Lakes ports (on Superior, Michigan, but mostly Lake Erie), mainly because the water levels at those ports were relatively stable.

The last Huletts were in service in the early 21st century. Mostly all the GL ore boats were, by the 1980's, self-unloading (like the Carl Bradley in post #1,920 in 1958 which was ahead of its time).

12 minute video of Huletts in Ohio in operation, starting about 6 min. 30 sec till the end. Operator is sitting on top of the bucket ... and goes IN the hold with the bucket.



sources: Hulett - Wikipedia, https://duluthport.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The_Hulett_Ore_Unloader.pdf, Self-discharger - Wikipedia

Huletts.jpg
Hulett-bucket.jpg
Hulett-discharging.jpg
1673721233970.png
NZHWR2RIF5BOZNQQCTRZ2W4WZ4.jpg
 
Last edited:
context chief? thx.
Lockheed M-21 with D-21 drone, which had a ramjet engine. 2 built and program cancelled after an in air collision. Mother ship was based on the A-12 (fighter) and had the radar and missile in it that developed into the AWG-9 radar and AIM-54 Phoenix missile in the F-14 Tomcat.

SR-71 Online - M-21 Blackbird
 
source: SR-71 Online - Starter Carts

Resized952021040995112500.jpg
Resized952021040995112500 (1).jpg
Resized952021040995112500 (2).jpg
Phillips-66AB.jpg


Stumbled on link to this video. starter carts for the J-58's had to get their RPM's up to at least 3,200 to light them.

Dunno if video was two "nailhead" Buick's or the 454 rats that came later.

Play it loud it you can. Not WOT but still cool.

 
Large Hadron Collider
c2V0K3VwLmpwZw.jpg



Wikipedia
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world's largest and highest-energy particle collider.[1][2] It was built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) between 1998 and 2008 in collaboration with over 10,000 scientists and hundreds of universities and laboratories, as well as more than 100 countries.[3] It lies in a tunnel 27 kilometres (17 mi) in circumference and as deep as 175 metres (574 ft) beneath the France–Switzerland border near Geneva.

The first collisions were achieved in 2010 at an energy of 3.5 teraelectronvolts (TeV) per beam, about four times the previous world record.[4][5] The discovery of the Higgs boson at the LHC was announced in 2012. Between 2013 and 2015, the LHC was shut down and upgraded; after those upgrades it reached 6.5 TeV per beam (13 TeV total collision energy).[6][7][8][9] At the end of 2018, it was shut down for three years for further upgrades.

The collider has four crossing points where the accelerated particles collide. Seven detectors, each designed to detect different phenomena, are positioned around the crossing points. The LHC primarily collides proton beams, but it can also accelerate beams of heavy ions: lead–lead collisions and proton–lead collisions are typically performed for one month a year.

The LHC's goal is to allow physicists to test the predictions of different theories of particle physics, including measuring the properties of the Higgs boson,[10] searching for the large family of new particles predicted by supersymmetric theories,[11] and other unresolved questions in particle physics.

Background[edit]​

The term hadron refers to subatomic composite particles composed of quarks held together by the strong force (analogous to the way that atoms and molecules are held together by the electromagnetic force).[12] The best-known hadrons are the baryons such as protons and neutrons; hadrons also include mesons such as the pion and kaon, which were discovered during cosmic ray experiments in the late 1940s and early 1950s.[13]

A collider is a type of a particle accelerator which brings two opposing particle beams together such that the particles collide. In particle physics, colliders, though harder to construct, are a powerful research tool because they reach a much higher center of mass energy than fixed target setups. [1] Analysis of the byproducts of these collisions gives scientists good evidence of the structure of the subatomic world and the laws of nature governing it. Many of these byproducts are produced only by high-energy collisions, and they decay after very short periods of time. Thus many of them are hard or nearly impossible to study in other ways.[14]

Purpose[edit]​

Many physicists hope that the Large Hadron Collider will help answer some of the fundamental open questions in physics, which concern the basic laws governing the interactions and forces among the elementary objects, the deep structure of space and time, and in particular the interrelation between quantum mechanics and general relativity.[15]

Data are also needed from high-energy particle experiments to suggest which versions of current scientific models are more likely to be correct – in particular to choose between the Standard Model and Higgsless model and to validate their predictions and allow further theoretical development.

Issues explored by LHC collisions include:[16][17]

Other open questions that may be explored using high-energy particle collisions:

Design[edit]​

The collider is contained in a circular tunnel, with a circumference of 26.7 kilometres (16.6 mi), at a depth ranging from 50 to 175 metres (164 to 574 ft) underground. The variation in depth was deliberate, to reduce the amount of tunnel that lies under the Jura Mountains to avoid having to excavate a vertical access shaft there. A tunnel was chosen to avoid having to purchase expensive land on the surface, which would also have an impact on the landscape and to take advantage of the shielding against background radiation that the earth's crust provides.[29]

220px-Location_Large_Hadron_Collider.png


Map of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN
The 3.8-metre (12 ft) wide concrete-lined tunnel, constructed between 1983 and 1988, was formerly used to house the Large Electron–Positron Collider.[30] The tunnel crosses the border between Switzerland and France at four points, with most of it in France. Surface buildings hold ancillary equipment such as compressors, ventilation equipment, control electronics and refrigeration plants.

220px-LHC_quadrupole_magnets.jpg


Superconducting quadrupole electromagnets are used to direct the beams to four intersection points, where interactions between accelerated protons will take place.
The collider tunnel contains two adjacent parallel beamlines (or beam pipes) each containing a beam, which travel in opposite directions around the ring. The beams intersect at four points around the ring, which is where the particle collisions take place. Some 1,232 dipole magnets keep the beams on their circular path (see image[31]), while an additional 392 quadrupole magnets are used to keep the beams focused, with stronger quadrupole magnets close to the intersection points in order to maximize the chances of interaction where the two beams cross. Magnets of higher multipole orders are used to correct smaller imperfections in the field geometry. In total, about 10,000 superconducting magnets are installed, with the dipole magnets having a mass of over 27 tonnes.[32] Approximately 96 tonnes of superfluid helium-4 is needed to keep the magnets, made of copper-clad niobium-titanium, at their operating temperature of 1.9 K (−271.25 °C), making the LHC the largest cryogenic facility in the world at liquid helium temperature. LHC uses 470 tonnes of Nb–Ti superconductor.[33]

During LHC operations, the CERN site draws roughly 200 MW of electrical power from the French electrical grid, which, for comparison, is about one-third the energy consumption of the city of Geneva; the LHC accelerator and detectors draw about 120 MW thereof.[34] Each day of its operation generates 140 terabytes of data.[35]

When running an energy of 6.5 TeV per proton,[36] once or twice a day, as the protons are accelerated from 450 GeV to 6.5 TeV, the field of the superconducting dipole magnets is increased from 0.54 to 7.7 teslas (T). The protons each have an energy of 6.5 TeV, giving a total collision energy of 13 TeV. At this energy, the protons have a Lorentz factor of about 6,930 and move at about 0.999999990 c, or about 3.1 m/s (11 km/h) slower than the speed of light (c). It takes less than 90 microseconds (μs) for a proton to travel 26.7 km around the main ring. This results in 11,245 revolutions per second for protons whether the particles are at low or high energy in the main ring, since the speed difference between these energies is beyond the fifth decimal.[37]

Rather than having continuous beams, the protons are bunched together, into up to 2,808 bunches, with 115 billion protons in each bunch so that interactions between the two beams take place at discrete intervals, mainly 25 nanoseconds (ns) apart, providing a bunch collision rate of 40 MHz. It was operated with fewer bunches in the first years. The design luminosity of the LHC is 1034 cm−2s−1,[38] which was first reached in June 2016.[39] By 2017, twice this value was achieved.[40]

220px-CERN_LHC_Proton_Source.jpg


The LHC protons originate from the small red hydrogen tank.
Before being injected into the main accelerator, the particles are prepared by a series of systems that successively increase their energy. The first system is the linear particle accelerator Linac4 generating 160 MeV negative hydrogen ions (H− ions), which feeds the Proton Synchrotron Booster (PSB). There, both electrons are stripped from the hydrogen ions leaving only the nucleus containing one proton. Protons are then accelerated to 2 GeV and injected into the Proton Synchrotron (PS), where they are accelerated to 26 GeV. Finally, the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) is used to increase their energy further to 450 GeV before they are at last injected (over a period of several minutes) into the main ring. Here, the proton bunches are accumulated, accelerated (over a period of 20 minutes) to their peak energy, and finally circulated for 5 to 24 hours while collisions occur at the four intersection points.[41]

The LHC physics programme is mainly based on proton–proton collisions. However, during shorter running periods, typically one month per year, heavy-ion collisions are included in the programme. While lighter ions are considered as well, the baseline scheme deals with lead ions[42] (see A Large Ion Collider Experiment). The lead ions are first accelerated by the linear accelerator LINAC 3, and the Low Energy Ion Ring (LEIR) is used as an ion storage and cooler unit. The ions are then further accelerated by the PS and SPS before being injected into LHC ring, where they reach an energy of 2.3 TeV per nucleon (or 522 TeV per ion),[43] higher than the energies reached by the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. The aim of the heavy-ion programme is to investigate quark–gluon plasma, which existed in the early universe.[44]

Detectors[edit]​

See also: List of Large Hadron Collider experiments
Nine detectors have been constructed at the LHC, located underground in large caverns excavated at the LHC's intersection points. Two of them, the ATLAS experiment and the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS), are large general-purpose particle detectors.[2] ALICE and LHCb have more specialized roles and the other five, TOTEM, MoEDAL, LHCf, SND and FASER, are much smaller and are for very specialized research. The ATLAS and CMS experiments discovered the Higgs boson, which is strong evidence that the Standard Model has the correct mechanism of giving mass to elementary particles.[45]

px-View_inside_detector_at_the_CMS_cavern_LHC_CERN.jpg


CMS detector for LHC

Computing and analysis facilities[edit]​

Main article: Worldwide LHC Computing Grid
Data produced by LHC, as well as LHC-related simulation, were estimated at approximately 15 petabytes per year (max throughput while running is not stated)[46]—a major challenge in its own right at the time.

The LHC Computing Grid[47] was constructed as part of the LHC design, to handle the massive amounts of data expected for its collisions. It is an international collaborative project that consists of a grid-based computer network infrastructure initially connecting 140 computing centres in 35 countries (over 170 in 36 countries as of 2012). It was designed by CERN to handle the significant volume of data produced by LHC experiments,[48][49] incorporating both private fibre optic cable links and existing high-speed portions of the public Internet to enable data transfer from CERN to academic institutions around the world.[50] The Open Science Grid is used as the primary infrastructure in the United States, and also as part of an interoperable federation with the LHC Computing Grid.

The distributed computing project LHC@home was started to support the construction and calibration of the LHC. The project uses the BOINC platform, enabling anybody with an Internet connection and a computer running Mac OS X, Windows or Linux to use their computer's idle time to simulate how particles will travel in the beam pipes. With this information, the scientists are able to determine how the magnets should be calibrated to gain the most stable "orbit" of the beams in the ring.[51] In August 2011, a second application (Test4Theory) went live which performs simulations against which to compare actual test data, to determine confidence levels of the results.

By 2012, data from over 6 quadrillion (6×1015) LHC proton–proton collisions had been analysed,[52] LHC collision data was being produced at approximately 25 petabytes per year, and the LHC Computing Grid had become the world's largest computing grid in 2012, comprising over 170 computing facilities in a worldwide network across 36 countries.[53][54][55]

Operational history[edit]​

The LHC first went operational on 10 September 2008,[56] but initial testing was delayed for 14 months from 19 September 2008 to 20 November 2009, following a magnet quench incident that caused extensive damage to over 50 superconducting magnets, their mountings, and the vacuum pipe.[57][58][59][60][61]

During its first run (2010–2013), the LHC collided two opposing particle beams of either protons at up to 4 teraelectronvolts (4 TeV or 0.64 microjoules), or lead nuclei (574 TeV per nucleus, or 2.76 TeV per nucleon).[62][63] Its first run discoveries included the long-sought Higgs boson, several composite particles (hadrons) like the χb (3P) bottomonium state, the first creation of a quark–gluon plasma, and the first observations of the very rare decay of the Bs meson into two muons (Bs0 → μ+μ−), which challenged the validity of existing models of supersymmetry.[64]

Construction[edit]​

Operational challenges[edit]​

The size of the LHC constitutes an exceptional engineering challenge with unique operational issues on account of the amount of energy stored in the magnets and the beams.[41][65] While operating, the total energy stored in the magnets is 10 GJ (2,400 kilograms of TNT) and the total energy carried by the two beams reaches 724 MJ (173 kilograms of TNT).[66]

Loss of only one ten-millionth part (10−7) of the beam is sufficient to quench a superconducting magnet, while each of the two beam dumps must absorb 362 MJ (87 kilograms of TNT). These energies are carried by very little matter: under nominal operating conditions (2,808 bunches per beam, 1.15×1011 protons per bunch), the beam pipes contain 1.0×10−9 gram of hydrogen, which, in standard conditions for temperature and pressure, would fill the volume of one grain of fine sand.

Cost[edit]​

See also: List of megaprojects
With a budget of €7.5 billion (approx. $9bn or £6.19bn as of June 2010), the LHC is one of the most expensive scientific instruments[1] ever built.[67] The total cost of the project is expected to be of the order of 4.6bn Swiss francs (SFr) (approx. $4.4bn, €3.1bn, or £2.8bn as of January 2010) for the accelerator and 1.16bn (SFr) (approx. $1.1bn, €0.8bn, or £0.7bn as of January 2010) for the CERN contribution to the experiments.[68]

The construction of LHC was approved in 1995 with a budget of SFr 2.6bn, with another SFr 210M toward the experiments. However, cost overruns, estimated in a major review in 2001 at around SFr 480M for the accelerator, and SFr 50M for the experiments, along with a reduction in CERN's budget, pushed the completion date from 2005 to April 2007.[69] The superconducting magnets were responsible for SFr 180M of the cost increase. There were also further costs and delays owing to engineering difficulties encountered while building the cavern for the Compact Muon Solenoid,[70] and also due to magnet supports which were insufficiently strongly designed and failed their initial testing (2007) and damage from a magnet quench and liquid helium escape (inaugural testing, 2008) (see: Construction accidents and delays).[71] Because electricity costs are lower during the summer, the LHC normally does not operate over the winter months,[72] although exceptions over the 2009/10 and 2012/2013 winters were made to make up for the 2008 start-up delays and to improve precision of measurements of the new particle discovered in 2012, respectively.

Construction accidents and delays[edit]​

  • On 25 October 2005, José Pereira Lages, a technician, was killed in the LHC when a switchgear that was being transported fell on top of him.[73]
  • On 27 March 2007, a cryogenic magnet support designed and provided by Fermilab and KEK broke during an initial pressure test involving one of the LHC's inner triplet (focusing quadrupole) magnet assemblies. No one was injured. Fermilab director Pier Oddone stated "In this case we are dumbfounded that we missed some very simple balance of forces". The fault had been present in the original design, and remained during four engineering reviews over the following years.[74] Analysis revealed that its design, made as thin as possible for better insulation, was not strong enough to withstand the forces generated during pressure testing. Details are available in a statement from Fermilab, with which CERN is in agreement.[75][76] Repairing the broken magnet and reinforcing the eight identical assemblies used by LHC delayed the start-up date, then planned for November 2007.
  • On 19 September 2008, during initial testing, a faulty electrical connection led to a magnet quench (the sudden loss of a superconducting magnet's superconducting ability owing to warming or electric field effects). Six tonnes of supercooled liquid helium—used to cool the magnets—escaped, with sufficient force to break 10-ton magnets nearby from their mountings, and caused considerable damage and contamination of the vacuum tube. Repairs and safety checks caused a delay of around 14 months.[77][78][79]
  • Two vacuum leaks were found in July 2009, and the start of operations was further postponed to mid-November 2009.[80]

Exclusion of Russia[edit]​

With the 2022 invasion of Ukraine by Russia, the participation of Russians with CERN was called into question. Approximately 8% of the workforce are of Russian nationality. In June 2022 CERN said the governing council "intends to terminate" CERN's cooperation agreements with Belarus and Russia when they expire, respectively in June and December 2024. CERN said it would monitor developments in Ukraine and remains prepared to take additional steps as warranted.[81][82] CERN further said that it would reduce the Ukrainian contribution to CERN for 2022 to the amount already remitted to the Organization, thereby waiving the second instalment of the contribution.[83]

Initial lower magnet currents[edit]​

Main article: Superconducting magnet § Magnet "training"
In both of its runs (2010 to 2012 and 2015), the LHC was initially run at energies below its planned operating energy, and ramped up to just 2 x 4 TeV energy on its first run and 2 x 6.5 TeV on its second run, below the design energy of 2 x 7 TeV. This is because massive superconducting magnets require considerable magnet training to handle the high currents involved without losing their superconducting ability, and the high currents are necessary to allow a high proton energy. The "training" process involves repeatedly running the magnets with lower currents to provoke any quenches or minute movements that may result. It also takes time to cool down magnets to their operating temperature of around 1.9 K (close to absolute zero). Over time the magnet "beds in" and ceases to quench at these lesser currents and can handle the full design current without quenching; CERN media describe the magnets as "shaking out" the unavoidable tiny manufacturing imperfections in their crystals and positions that had initially impaired their ability to handle their planned currents. The magnets, over time and with training, gradually become able to handle their full planned currents without quenching.[84][85]

Inaugural tests (2008)[edit]​

The first beam was circulated through the collider on the morning of 10 September 2008.[86] CERN successfully fired the protons around the tunnel in stages, three kilometres at a time. The particles were fired in a clockwise direction into the accelerator and successfully steered around it at 10:28 local time.[56] The LHC successfully completed its major test: after a series of trial runs, two white dots flashed on a computer screen showing the protons travelled the full length of the collider. It took less than one hour to guide the stream of particles around its inaugural circuit.[87] CERN next successfully sent a beam of protons in an anticlockwise direction, taking slightly longer at one and a half hours owing to a problem with the cryogenics, with the full circuit being completed at 14:59.
 
the LHC is a remarkable collection of heavy metal.

not only in construction and design, but the very thought of accelerating particles to nearly light speed, crashing them into each other, and being able to detect what results.

i am of two minds on this.

standard model of physics has 17 known fundamental particles. we didnt know that 100 years ago. 20 years ago the Higgs boson was just a "math prediction" ... then the "juiced up" LHC and smart folks "found" it.

but, maybe standard model has twice this many particles tho? four times this many? what does that mean? we still really dont "get it" yet.

so, as remarkable as those things we've done were/are, nature is still holding many secrets. examples, the force particle for gravity - the graviton - is predicted but not confirmed yet. what is "dark matter" really? tau neutrino predicted but not routinely "findable". on and on.

whats the "prize" for humans to figure out these things? warp drive? time travel? 1,000,000 quibit quantum computers? two-hundred year life spans? Parkinson cures? Regrow lost limbs/organs?

let our imaginations run free. science fiction "today", is science fact "tomorrow". finding the Higgs was great ... using it "at will" (e.g., like we use photons and electrons to participate in this forum, use cell phones, get MRI's, - "yesterday's" science fiction) is greater yet.

source: LHC Detector
Resized952021040995112500.jpg
 
Last edited:

nc_ohc=0vwd3ZjSe-MAX-ksR7Z&_nc_ht=scontent.fagc1-1.jpg
 
I've never understood the salvaging of some of these ships. They are all in working order or they couldn't beach themselves. Some look GREAT! So why? Surplus, obsolete, nobody willing to purchase a running ship? Why?

I understand those desiring to cut them up for money, I just don't get the why they would be available?
Obsolete, and ships die from the inside out. Rust is oxidation of steel, slow to happen submerged in water (oxygen level is lower in water than open air, why we cannot breathe water), the ship rust/rots from the inside where the skeleton is. This is incredibly expensive to repair and replace as most of it is covered by machinery, inside fuel tanks, or cargo holds. I was on a 20 year old fast frigate in the Navy we had rust through on webbing in the ribs and support structures for certain machinery. Also a lot of ships have conventional steam turbine engines, these are not very efficient due to all the thermal and pressure losses in the piping. Most ships nowadays use a form of 2 stroke diesel engine that is direct drive to the propeller. It runs in both directions for reversing and only turns 200-300 rpm propeller efficiency range. Lot of cruise ships have pods that stick out from the hull. Most don't go long distances and are always in and out of ports so maneuverability is a priority.
If you go find You Tube videos from the USS Texas drydocking you can see that the hull under the water did not look bad except for the dents where the structure behind was bending/collapsing.
 
I have a magazine that has a picture of this engine running at full afterburner on a test stand!! Incredible!
 
Last edited:
Space x advancements on the Raptor 2

another cool vid @barnfind. I am 110% into what Space X is doing and the vision.

one pet peeve .. if the narrator said "Elon says ...", one more time, I was gonna hurl .. my keyboard at my monitor :). Sounded like cult worship. I coulda done with "less Elon" overall.

That said, remarkable achievements, laudable goal by Musk and his team at SpaceX.

Oh ... and they did away with that pesky, leaky, "hydrogen". Now all they gotta do is not blow up. Some will .. as long as they don't kill anybody tho.
 
Idle thought.

What stops this tall sum-gun from rolling over (big container ships too)? You can eyeball it and tell physically more of it is ABOVE (90%) the water line than below (10%) it. But the word "more" is incomplete.

source: Why don't cruise ships tip over?, Ship Buoyancy and Stability: How Ships Float and Stay Upright | The Shipyard, Cruise Ship Size Comparison, Dimensions | CruiseMapper

gCruiseShips-2020-Celebrity-APEX-Dusk-Flat-Smaller.jpg
2cyo909y8w_rtrmadp_0_royal-caribbean-group-results.jpg
oasis-class-diagram.jpg

I knew the answer conceptually. Learned Archimedes Principle in the sixth grade.

Engineers in design (weights, dimensions, shape of hull, stabilizer fins, etc.,) , and the crew in operation (passenger & cargo loads, winds, ballast management, etc.,) after its built know who the manage this.

Center of gravity and center of buoyancy is LOWER than the "plane" of the waterline. Center of buoyancy (COB) is below the center of gravity (COG) and BOTH are below the waterline. Keeping that relationship, and relatively perpendicular to the water line, all will be fine.

floats.gif
cruise-ship-size-comparison.jpg
1675007464558.png

All that stuff low in the boat (engines, propellers, ballast tanks, etc) vs., everything above it (passengers, cabins, pools, restaurants, etc.), makes COG low.

Managing "weights" in operation (as long is ship is NOT taking on water, therefore becoming LESS buoyant) stops it from sinking (COG > COB). As long as gravity doesn't exceed buoyant force of the water, the boat will float.

Otherwise, she's goin' down.
 
Back
Top