commando1
Old Man with a Hat
You a Teamster?
Seniority should go by the amount of posts one makes. Not the date when you first made a profile.
Glad you agree. So get at it.I agree post whores should get seniority.
Glad you agree. So get at it.
One only becomes a post ***** when one has nothing worthwhile to post...but posts anyways. We haven't had to many of those lately.Not me, I'm not whorish. only 500 posts since Nov 2010... I think you have to be north of 10K to be considered post ***** material.
I agree post whores should get seniority.
03/10/11 | - | commando1 | - | 20550 | - | 18.38 | ||||||
11/16/10 | - | polara71 | - | 18481 | - | 15.00 | ||||||
04/16/11 | - | 1978 NYB | - | 15470 | - | 14.31 | ||||||
10/02/11 | - | 70nport | - | 8033 | - | 8.81 | ||||||
11/14/10 | - | detmatt | - | 6688 | - | 5.42 | ||||||
09/04/12 | - | Stormer | - | 4894 | - | 8.53 | ||||||
02/13/11 | - | cm23uoc | - | 3875 | - | 3.39 | ||||||
03/09/11 | - | bluefury361 | - | 3544 | - | 3.17 | ||||||
03/02/11 | - | mdh157 | - | 2370 | - | 2.10 | ||||||
11/12/10 | - | fratzog | - | 2265 | - | 1.83 | ||||||
05/12/13 | - | tallhair | - | 1743 | - | 5.38 |
Yah. Smart move. Reward the spammers....Seniority should go by the amount of posts one makes. Not the date when you first made a profile.
I'm not rewarding anyone. Just saying you want true seniority...do it by the amount of posts....and really, there are bigger targets for spammers out there than "C Bodies Only"....jeeez, get a grip will you.Yah. Smart move. Reward the spammers....
You must love ebay searches.
Which really silly when you look at it logically and clearly. Someone could create a profile on day one and not post anything and yet get seniority because they sat on thier assess all that time without contributing. Yes, that's the union way. Reward for being there, but not doing anything.seniority is always based on time, not gab.
By no means official, here is a list of the more currently active members.
11/06/10 - joeychgo
11/12/10 - fratzog
11/13/10 - azblackhemi
11/14/10 - detmatt
11/16/10 - polara71
12/04/10 - 300rag
01/07/11 - rexus31
03/02/11 - mdh157
03/09/11 - bluefury361
03/10/11 - commando
04/16/11 - 1978 NYB
Alan (8/9/2013)
With daily average
03/10/11 - commando1 - 20550 - 18.38 11/16/10 - polara71 - 18481 - 15.00 04/16/11 - 1978 NYB - 15470 - 14.31 10/02/11 - 70nport - 8033 - 8.81 11/14/10 - detmatt - 6688 - 5.42 09/04/12 - Stormer - 4894 - 8.53 02/13/11 - cm23uoc - 3875 - 3.39 03/09/11 - bluefury361 - 3544 - 3.17 03/02/11 - mdh157 - 2370 - 2.10 11/12/10 - fratzog - 2265 - 1.83 05/12/13 - tallhair - 1743 - 5.38
Again nothing official but a 10 minute search.
Alan
Don't know how its done on the DryDock. I'm no advocate for SuperB. SuperB has more posts than "X", then he should have more seniority due to his quantifiable amount of contributions, not when he happened to discover this site and decided to make a profile way back when. The MORE you contribute the MORE seniority you should have. Time means nothing.NO......not at all, I have been a steady contributor on the Drydock for ten plus years, less than 1000 posts. So you think that means someone I havent been there that long?
Moparts, been there for sixteen years, probably less than 5000 posts, does that make me less of a member?
SuperB hasnt posted in a hell of a long time BUT HE HAS SENIORITY............. So what is the definition of active member mean here?
Fascinating when the average Joe starts to grapple with real life issues concerning unionism and how it should work.
I taught college level Labor Relations courses for a couple of years. I'm going to stand back and observe....
Posted via Topify on Android