MrMopar's 1969 California Highway Patrol restoration

I have on occasion seen a stud used when used with a plug wire loom when the rest were bolts.
I wouldn't take it as gospel tho....

Posted via Topify on Android
 
Thanks,

I'm going with it, I'm really more interested in where the second one might belong.


Alan

All the big blocks I've had .. late 60's / early 70's had studs at front and rear of the engine on the exhaust side of the head so yes 2 per side. Pretty handy for installing the valve covers and keeping them located while putting the rest of the bolts in IMHO
 
All the big blocks I've had .. late 60's / early 70's had studs at front and rear of the engine on the exhaust side of the head so yes 2 per side. Pretty handy for installing the valve covers and keeping them located while putting the rest of the bolts in IMHO

Yup, I also have studs on the front and rear of my 383.


Then I guess it is settled and my covers arent coming off again this week...
 
Ok, well I only have 1 per head and I believe it to be on the front on both.
None of my pictures clearly show it.


Alan
 
My 71 440 car doesnt have them. They MAY have been changed by a do gooder. After the original owner died around 2000 or just before the car went through several hands before landing here, permanently.
The 70 383 car has them on all four corners. The engine has been rebuilt but everything is stock and factory specs....I am the second owner.

IMG_7434.jpgIMG_7435.jpgIMG_7436.jpgIMG_7437.jpg

IMG_7434.jpg


IMG_7435.jpg


IMG_7436.jpg


IMG_7437.jpg
 
Thanks,

I looked at all my original hardware and the count is correct with 1 stud each (or 2 on one head).
The other bolts are all factory correct so I'll just stick them one the front corners.


Alan
 
my first car (I was 15 years old) was my Dad's old 69 Polara cop/civic car. It had stud on the valve covers too and I've never seen it again since.
 
Last edited:
One the biggest obstacles I have trying to work on my projects is space. The nice thing about being single and having a house that is about to have a remodel done is that I have no problem setting up shop in the house. I recently got my engine block and heads back from the machine shop and finally have everything in place to start the assembly, so it was put on the stand and moved into what is normally a dining room (that I don't even use, table is a decorator item I built.).

2014-05-24_002.jpg


My friend that will be doing the assembly and trying to show me wanted it painted first, the heads were bolted on along with all the tin, openings masked and painted. Mopar Performance Street Hemi Orange was used but I feel it is a little off, my friend has another color he feels is dead on that he used on his ’70 340 Cuda.

2014-05-25_001.jpg


The color is a little to orange for me but close.

2014-05-25_002.jpg


Per his instructions the engine was machined to a piston to wall clearance of less than 0.005. Now that it is painted we have some other things to take care of before the actual assembly starts.


Alan
 
Last edited:
Spent several hours today cleaning, chasing the head bolt holes cleaning all the galleys and water passages.

We went to put the crank in and realized there were no main bearings so I need to call the machine shop up tomorrow and see if they can locate them.


So for the most part it was all about cleaning today, double-checked all the measurements.


Alan
 
Here is something interesting to ponder...

My car has a scheduled build date of 5/30 but the engine has a 6/11 build date on it, but we already know that the build date is not necessarily the actual build date but the scheduled build date.

and this block had a tag riveted to the side which typically refers to a warrantee replacement...

but before we start jumping to conclusions the VIN on the block uses the same die set as the transmission meaning the individual digits were ganged together in a holder and both the engine and transmission were stamped at the same time. One can see that if this is the case the difference in impression strength/depth would be the same as well as the character font, spacing and overall look.


I'm not sure what to think other than it is interesting.


Alan


BLOCK VIN
2014-05-25_003.jpg


TRANSMISSION VIN
2014-05-26_001.jpg


ENGINE BUILD DATE
2014-05-26_004.jpg


CASTING DATE AND TAG
2014-05-26_003.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yes the casting date jives and the VIN stampings look right. Maybe a back log in completed engines caused a back log in the actual production date of your car, or it could have been another parts delay.
 
Is it odd to have a VIN on a warranty replacement block? I would have thought the pad should be blank. Is it also common to have the casting date out of sync with the build date on the block? Is there a range of dates that would be considered date correct, can you have a 68 casting date on a 69 or even a 70? And those little clocks..... Just curious, I'd love to learn what all of these stampings mean. Dang, I think we need a whole thread just to explain this!
 
Back
Top