all I’m saying is these GT’s are hard to find, and since you think I don’t appreciate my GT why didn’t you buy it from Pete? That car sat on here for 1 month? Just because I dropped it off at a shop and paid to have it painted doesn’t mean that I didn’t
1. Source material for the front buckets.
2. Find a shop to upholster them.
3. Find over a dozen parts to replace worn parts.
4. Quoted one price then overpaying when it’s underquoted.
5. Dash pad, seat backs, etc.
6. Small details.
7. Spending a **** load of money, which I’m ok with because I love my GT and it was well worth it!
My no pain no gain comment was for everybody that’s restoring a car period. Whether you do it with your own hands or farm it out. It’s still a lot of money, and time, and stress. I love mopars, all of them. My comment and pictures were meant to inspire the guys that are in the middle of a resto, to give them fuel, to see what the finished product could look like. I’m so glad I checked the for sale page 1 year and 2 months ago, Pete did a great job on my GT. Just for the record, what he was asking is what I pretty much paid. I knew it was worth it! Too bad nobody else thought so, or it would’ve been gone the first day!
My 2 cents
The topic of the thread discussion was the pricing of the green car presently for sale. When @Davea Lux enumerated all the costs involved in getting the green SFGT restored, you disagreed with his estimates and I was trying to understand why given that you paid in the vicinity of $20K for your vehicle that had much of the work done that is still needed on the green car. So lets say you spent another $10K on paint and interior work - so I estimate you are in your car around $30K.
If one were to pay $20K for the green car that needed another $20K of work to get it up to the level of your car when you bought yours (Pete said in his listing of the car when you bought it that he was losing money selling it for the $20K he was asking, so I assume he didn't pay all that much for the car in the first place because in doing the math on the work he did to your car before you bought it easily totaled around $20K assuming he isn't charging for his time in doing the work either at anything close to today's standard rates) and then one also has to spend another $14K on top of that price for interior work and paint plus fixing some body rust, then one would have invested some $54K to yield a car that is less desirable than yours since it lacks a sought after paint color like yours and yours has plenty of options also that the green car doesn't have.
Bottom line to me is you were lucky you found Pete's SFGT when you did and bought it because you got a good deal and your car needed less body work than the green one.
So I still want to know why you think Davea Lux's estimates were not reasonable, thats all. His point is that this green car is over priced given the work it still needs and while you got a good deal, there is still a lot more pain left relative to the green car that you got to avoid big time. So your making the statement about "no pain, no gain" came across as "nice for you to say" since you avoided a lot of pain thanks to Pete but there is plenty more pain in this green one yet for sale. Would you buy the green one restored at some $54K?
I didn't buy the SFGT Pete was selling because I already own a SFGT that is also an original California car and it is already a desirable one too. I do all my own mechanical work just like Pete does so I have some idea of the costs in terms of time and money involved. So I do have some idea of the pain vs. gain concept.
Last edited: