BigFury
Well-Known Member
Those Aussie "muscle cars" look like a Dart /Falcon reject, not my cup of tea. But if that's all there is then G'day!
Rejects?, OK then..Those Aussie "muscle cars" look like a Dart /Falcon reject, not my cup of tea. But if that's all there is then G'day!
No offense if that's what you are into, I've never appriceated the styles. FWIWRejects?, OK then..
In many instances, those 'rejects' are fetching more money than US muscle cars, go figure.I'd gladly take one of those over a Volare or Aspen... which is what we got.
I'm sure a select few do sell for more than the American models. But Id be curious to see which cars they are being compared to on the sales market.In many instances, those 'rejects' are fetching more money than US muscle cars, go figure.
You may be taking what Carmine stated out of context, perhaps he can clarify.I'm sure a select few do sell for more than the American models. But Id be curious to see which cars they are being compared to on the sales market.
Again, as Carmine so accurately pointed out,"GM/Holden may interesting but a 3rd place effort." Really sums it up. I haven't seen to many of these roll across the auction block going for the big money. As a matter of fact, I've never seen one. That's not to imply that I'm ignorantly dismissing them as being junk. They always struck me as being more of a weak interpretation of the real thing.
The CH Chrysler by Chrysler hardtop is my favourite Australian car, photos really don't do it justice, same with the Facon hardtops, in the metal they are just awesome.I find them utterly fascinating. A reminder of a time when the world was a more interesting place. I actually browse an Australian classified site every so often and build my imaginary car collection. I'll take a "Chrysler by Chrysler" coupe please!
And if I were a Ford guy, I'd be all over the Falcons.
...I think the GM/Holdens are interesting, but a third-place effort.
The Australian Hemi 6s were 215 (low compression), 245 (standard and 'S' -more power- variants) and 265 (same as the 245, standard and 'S' version, plus the souped up versions that are found in the R/T Valiant Chargers). There never was a Hemi 235.OK, in this one thread engine sizes of 235, 245, and 265 have been stated. Were there three or is there some bad info here? I'm curious.
I have a picture of one of these Aussie A Bodies at home, with shots of the motor. Wish I were there now to post them.
The engines didnt have a true HEMI head design and was more a PR exercise than anything. The pistons were flattops as used in 318's. Still, the 265 engine with triple webers that were jetted for racing put out 400HP.Looking at my own pictures, I've always been curious. They call these Hemis but the spark plugs are in a "wedge" position. Anyone have an explanation?
Case in point, Nothing to get a hard on over.The engines didnt have a true HEMI head design and was more a PR exercise than anything. The pistons were flattops as used in 318's. Still, the 265 engine with triple webers that were jetted for racing put out 400HP.
A six cylinder 265cu in. motor putting out 400 horsepower compared to the 440HP at 375 horsepower, it's worthy of taking note for sure. A much better match in a smaller car when you consider the weight of the six compared to an eight and the resulting improvement on handling.Case in point, Nothing to get a hard on over.
I find them utterly fascinating. A reminder of a time when the world was a more interesting place. I actually browse an Australian classified site every so often and build my imaginary car collection. I'll take a "Chrysler by Chrysler" coupe please!
And if I were a Ford guy, I'd be all over the Falcons.
...I think the GM/Holdens are interesting, but a third-place effort.