Voyager 1 and 2 still alive!!!! 38,000 mph!

Webb taking a look at a celestial icon. The Crab Nebula.

source: The Crab Nebula Seen in New Light by NASA’s Webb - NASA

A supernova remnant, 6,500 LY away from us, this thing was first observed by the Chinese ~1,000 years ago. They could see it in daylight it was so bright for a time (for 23 days after it suddenly appeared in 1054 A.D.).

Hubble (in visible light) and the left, and Webb in IR on the right. Lotta heavy elements in that cloud, too (see #620 above).

1698760045620.png

"At first glance, the general shape of the supernova remnant is similar to the optical wavelength image released in 2005 from NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope:

In Webb’s infrared observation, a crisp, cage-like structure of fluffy gaseous filaments are shown in red-orange. However, in the central regions, emission from dust grains (yellow-white and green) is mapped out by Webb for the first time.


Additional aspects of the inner workings of the Crab Nebula become more prominent and are seen in greater detail in the infrared light captured by Webb.

In particular, Webb highlights what is known as synchrotron radiation: emission produced from charged particles, like electrons, moving around magnetic field lines at relativistic speeds. The radiation appears here as milky smoke-like material throughout the majority of the Crab Nebula’s interior.


This feature is a product of the nebula’s pulsar, a rapidly rotating neutron star. The pulsar’s strong magnetic field accelerates particles to extremely high speeds and causes them to emit radiation as they wind around magnetic field lines.

Though emitted across the electromagnetic spectrum, the synchrotron radiation is seen in unprecedented detail with Webb’s NIRCam instrument."
 
Last edited:
NASASpaceNews

May Have Swallowed Another star, and yet it Could Explode at any time.​



 
we have 2-3 deep field shots, trying to find the oldest celestrial object. A group called JADES (JWST Advanced Deep EIntergalactic Survey) does nothing but study these "deep field" shots from Webb and keep finding new "old" objects.

Recall, the higher the "redshift z" value, the farther away (older) the object is. So, same pics we already saw, new stuff identified IN those pics. You can nerd out at the link.

excerpt on redshift.

"When light is emitted from a source, it has a particular wavelength.

The longer it must travel through the expanding Universe before being absorbed by an observer, the greater the amount that the wavelength of that light will be redshifted, or stretched to longer values, compared to the wavelength it has when it was emitted."

source: Explore JWST's deepest views ever for yourself

1699047431138.png

"This image shows the region of study of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES).

This area includes and contains the Hubble eXtreme Deep Field and reveals new galaxies at record-breaking distances that Hubble could not see.

The colors on JWST images are not “true color” but rather are assigned based on a variety of choices.

This image, released in December of 2022, has since been augmented by follow-on observations within the same region of space."




1699047656078.png

"The viewing area of the JADES survey, along with the four most distant galaxies verified within this field-of-view.

The three galaxies at z = 13.20, 12.63, and 11.58 are all more distant than the previous record-holder, GN-z11, which had been identified by Hubble and has now been spectroscopically confirmed by JWST to be at a redshift of z = 10.6.

No doubt these records will themselves be broken, possibly with galaxy candidates that already exist within the same field-of-view."


remember, Hubble can see at least 7x better than Hubble, a lot due to mirror size, than add Webb's ultra-low operating temperature, and it used infrared light (can penetrated space dust when visible light cannot).

1699048041035.png

"The JWST, now fully operational, has seven times the light-gathering power of Hubble.

But will be able to see much farther into the infrared portion of the spectrum, revealing those galaxies existing even earlier than what Hubble could ever see, owing to its longer-wavelength capabilities and much lower operating temperatures.

Galaxy populations seen prior to the epoch of reionization should abundantly be discovered, and Hubble’s old cosmic distance record has already been broken."
 
Last edited:
NASASpaceNews

May Have Swallowed Another star, and yet it Could Explode at any time.​




My uneducated brain want to know, if Betelguese does supernova, how does its mass determine if it will become a neutron star, or become a black hole?

Seeing some of the images astronomers use, I'm glad they can dumb it down and give people like me the Astronomy for idiots version!
 
I'll get educated with ya chief ... Seems like anything 8+ times bigger (mass) than our Sun, can supernovae, with one of two celestial body outcomes left: a neutron star, or a black hole.

btw, the are TWO types of supernovae, too, Type I and Type II.

source: Classifying Supernovae: The 'Earth-shattering' Kabooms

1699055882439.png


Our sun, an average star, is too small to supernovae, so it expands to "red giant", bad for Earth as Sun's diameter would be bigger than Earth's orbit. Then it turns into a "white dwarf".

source: Imagine the Universe!, What Is a Supernova?

1699055391197.png
 
Last edited:
From what I have read if it exploded today
it will not be seen on earth for 600 to 700 years as it is 600 to 700 light years away from us. It may have already blown up a hundred years ago for all we know.
 
Last edited:

Nasa Space News​

The First Image of Four Exoplanets by the JWST: How and Why They Are Different from Ours​



 
Fun facts!! The Sun is 20 years old.


 
Last edited:
Webb (tag-teams with Chandra, the X-ray telescope) finds something 13.2 billion years old (when the Universe was 97% younger than it is now). That's what we built the darn thing to be able to discover.

What was the thing? A black hole. Yes, a black hole. Ok, that's new news .. we only theorized they were around early, but NOT this early.

What about it? It is stunningly BIG. almost as big as the galaxy its in. It may have the mass of up to 100 million (one hundred million) Suns. Most black holes - the big ones we know about -- are up to 100,000 (one hundred thousand) Suns. That's big too, but ....

Oh, evidence indicates it was "born" that big.

The last point? Crude analogy. its kinda like learning you have a newborn nephew today, and when you see him next week at your sister's house, he's as big as a fifteen year old boy.

If you wanna deep dive it, see link: NASA Telescopes Discover Record-Breaking Black Hole - NASA

1699465399042.png


"Astronomers found the most distant black hole ever detected in X-rays (in a galaxy dubbed UHZ1) using the Chandra and Webb space telescopes. X-ray emission is a telltale signature of a growing supermassive black hole.

This result may explain how some of the first supermassive black holes in the universe formed.


These images show the galaxy cluster Abell 2744 that UHZ1 is located behind, in X-rays from Chandra and infrared data from Webb, as well as close-ups of the black hole host galaxy UHZ1."


Aside.

What's remarkable? Photo above has this black hole in it. A barely visible dot, in an OCEAN of dots, where EACH dot is most likely a galaxy with 200 billion stars in it.

And, turns out a least ONE to those dots is 13.2 BILLION LY away (13,200,000,000 x 6,000,000,000,000 miles).

And this a little-bitty patch of sky, looking in one direction in the sky.

Humbling too, in a way. This rock we are on? Infinitesimal!
 
Last edited:
Humbling too, in a way. This rock we are on? Infinitesimal
I have always said that if you want to feel small in the grand scheme of things go cross an ocean in small ship. Throw in some weather, and it will enhance the experience.
Space is that, multiplied by more than my brain can wrap around.
 
Updated Webb vs/. Hubble.

Detail at link, and above and under photo.

source: NASA’s Webb, Hubble Combine to Create Most Colorful View of Universe - NASA


"NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope and Hubble Space Telescope have united to study an expansive galaxy cluster known as MACS0416.

The resulting panchromatic image combines visible and infrared light to assemble one of the most comprehensive views of the universe ever taken.

Located about 4.3 billion light-years from Earth, MACS0416 is a pair of colliding galaxy clusters that will eventually combine to form an even bigger cluster."


1699643660920.png

1699643718109.png


"This side-by-side comparison of galaxy cluster MACS0416 as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope in optical light (left) and the James Webb Space Telescope in infrared light (right) reveals different details.

Both images feature hundreds of galaxies, however the Webb image shows galaxies that are invisible or only barely visible in the Hubble image.

This is because Webb’s infrared vision can detect galaxies too distant or dusty for Hubble to see. (Light from distant galaxies is redshifted due to the expansion of the universe.)

The total exposure time for Webb was about 22 hours, compared to 122 hours of exposure time for the Hubble image.

The image reveals a wealth of details that are only possible to capture by combining the power of both space telescopes.

It includes a bounty of galaxies outside the cluster and a sprinkling of sources that vary over time, likely due to gravitational lensing – the distortion and amplification of light from distant background sources."
 
Another first-ever view of a feature in space by Webb. This one, the center of our own Milky Way (in direction of Sagittarius).

The "wow" factor here?

We have been looking at galactic center for almost 500 years with optical devices beyond our eyes' capabilities. Now, Webb sees some things entirely new. For example apparently "straight lines" of ionized hydrogen in space? A "dark cloud" in infrared?

Was this stuff always there but we couldn't see them 'til Webb? Or, did they just appear (meaning, the light just got here from event(s) that occurred 25,000 years ago) last week?

You can decide if you get into the details at the link. Heads up, the details are scientific/nerdy, but, once again, the space kids will be sorting this one for decades.

source: NASA’s Webb Reveals New Features in Heart of Milky Way - NASA

1700571278963.png


1700571501655.png


"The latest image from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope shows a portion of the dense center of our galaxy in unprecedented detail, including never-before-seen features astronomers have yet to explain.

The star-forming region, named Sagittarius C (Sgr C), is about 300 light-years from the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A.

The NIRCam (Near-Infrared Camera) instrument on NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope’s reveals a portion of the Milky Way’s dense core in a new light.

An estimated 500,000 stars shine in this image of the Sagittarius C (Sgr C) region, along with some as-yet unidentified features.

A large region of ionized hydrogen, shown in cyan, contains intriguing needle-like structures that lack any uniform orientation.*.
 

Deepest We Have Ever Seen Into the Sun​


 
As I sink further into old age and before I die, I'm still hopeful that we will eventually find a way to travel around the universe on a galactic scale. It is good to know there are at least a few deep thinkers still working on the problem. The following link and YT video are about a year old and I've haven't heard about any recent updates.


 
As I sink further into old age and before I die, I'm still hopeful that we will eventually find a way to travel around the universe on a galactic scale. It is good to know there are at least a few deep thinkers still working on the problem. The following link and YT video are about a year old and I've haven't heard about any recent updates.

[/URL]


Our dreams become reality. Interstellar travel will happen.
 
Interstellar travel will happen.
At the risk of being called a tin foil hatter, I say we are very close if not there. Unfortunately, the information is carefully hidden behind a deep black classification screen. I'm personally pessimistic about any real disclosure on this topic.
 
December 10. Supernova remnant called Cassiopia A, 11,000 LY away. We first saw it on Earth in the year 1690, so we've go lotta pics. While a long way for here, its still in the Milky Way.

sources. NASA’s Webb Stuns With New High-Definition Look at Exploded Star - NASA, Cassiopeia A - The colourful aftermath of a violent stellar death,

"NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope’s new view of Cassiopeia A (Cas A) in near-infrared light is giving astronomers hints at the dynamical processes occurring within the supernova remnant.

Tiny clumps represented in bright pink and orange make up the supernova’s inner shell, and are comprised of sulfur, oxygen, argon, and neon from the star itself. A large, striated blob at the bottom right corner of the image, nicknamed Baby Cas A, is one of the few light echoes visible NIRCam’s field of view.

In this image, red, green, and blue were assigned to Webb’s NIRCam data at 4.4, 3.56, and 1.62 microns (F444W, F356W, and F162M, respectively).


1702433446688.png
 
Back
Top