Ammeter bypass

To follow up on this subject a bit, as a result of a more recent promotion of this by-pass as making the original system “safe”, without any mention of the added risk by a self-proclaimed Mopar expert YouTuber. I have posted some demonstration videos about this “shunt wire” by-pass and some other related Chrysler electrical issues. Includes my experience with and a demonstration of the above-mentioned C-body charge path recall some here with a pre-externally shunted ammeter may be interested in.

I watched the video. Great stuff!

One question on the "recall wire". Does that have a fusible link in it? I'm going to make the change with my '70 300 to this layout, rather than the "bypass" that I did a couple years ago and it seems to me that a fusible link would make sense in that wire.
 
I watched the video. Great stuff!

One question on the "recall wire". Does that have a fusible link in it? I'm going to make the change with my '70 300 to this layout, rather than the "bypass" that I did a couple years ago and it seems to me that a fusible link would make sense in that wire.
No fusible link was part of the recall wire as I recall, not really needed there to parallel the alternator output feed to splice 1. In the stock system, stock alternator, the battery is the only source of power with enough current potential to light up the 12 ga unfused wiring in the event of a short circuit. The stock fusible link would blow on a short in either alternator feed wires.
 
No fusible link was part of the recall wire as I recall, not really needed there to parallel the alternator output feed to splice 1. In the stock system, stock alternator, the battery is the only source of power with enough current potential to light up the 12 ga unfused wiring in the event of a short circuit. The stock fusible link would blow on a short in either alternator feed wires.
I had to wrap my head around it, but once I did, I understood. Your wiring diagram helped with that.
 
I had to wrap my head around it, but once I did, I understood. Your wiring diagram helped with that.
Didn’t think about it at the time, I could have emphasized in the videos more, this C-body recall approach as an alternative to the “Shunt wire” (direct alternator to battery) by-pass on other platforms as well that use that same fuse box. Includes ’70-74 E-bodies, ’71-74 B-bodies. A little more work for the older fuse boxes but could be done. Pretty simple to install, relieves much current stress on the single alternator feed Packard terminals, retains the factory circuit protection, and does not mess with the ammeter accuracy.
 
Didn’t think about it at the time, I could have emphasized in the videos more, this C-body recall approach as an alternative to the “Shunt wire” (direct alternator to battery) by-pass on other platforms as well that use that same fuse box. Includes ’70-74 E-bodies, ’71-74 B-bodies. A little more work for the older fuse boxes but could be done. Pretty simple to install, relieves much current stress on the single alternator feed Packard terminals, retains the factory circuit protection, and does not mess with the ammeter accuracy.
There's no reason why this can't be applied to other bodies. As you say, those are the easiest ones to do.

I think the '66 up fuse block could be done by connecting to the rear of block, right to the bus. Yes, more work, but I don't think it would be that hard.

'65 and down have that nice bolt on connection that eliminates the Packard connectors for battery and alternator connections, so I'd say it's not needed for them.
 
65 and down have that nice bolt on connection that eliminates the Packard connectors for battery and alternator connections, so I'd say it's not needed for them.
Yes, the engineers that created original design for that bulkhead charge path connection got it right. The early sixties bulkhead screw terminal connector. Aways believed the bean counters made the call to use Packard’s instead, likely saved a fraction of cent and a few seconds on the assembly line per car. Then again, nothing about these cars was ever designed to last more than a few years, until the next trade-in.
early bulkhead design.jpg
 
Back
Top